Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

928 engine death.....knock....answer. E85

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-12-2018, 05:18 PM
  #1  
IcemanG17
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,265
Received 71 Likes on 56 Posts
Default 928 engine death.....knock....answer. E85

With lots of recent discussion about blown race 928 engines it makes me question fuel? E85 has an octane rating above 110 and is nearly impossible to knock. Sure your fuel system must flow around 30% more to support it, but given its cost is well under $3 per gallon and high octane race fuel is over 10 it seems like a viable option for racers, especially those running boosted 928’s

an example a friend has an Apha-N GTR with its twin turbo 3.8L v6. On street 91 it makes 870 awhp....on 100 octane race gas it makes 1040awhp....on e85 it makes 1135awhp.....nice 30% boost on e85 with zero worries about knock... i believe George’s ORR racer is above 500whp now...... not sure what fuel he runs, but 650whp on e85 surely will go faster....assuming his fuel cell holds enough to make it the distance...

i experienced knock on casper, running 91 octane Sunoco at 9-1 cr at 34’ timing around torque peak.....I thought it was a miss.....tried adding fuel...nope....once I got smart and turned spark down at torque peak it ran great....better than ever.....I just wonder how much damage I did while figuring it out.....the engine did run fine for a few more events.. live and learn I guess.... the stand alone ecu on Casper allows unlimited tuning of spark-fuel every 250rpm. Yes it runs crappy at idle and part throttle....but sings at wot

sure I don’t have a dog in this fight as I don’t own a race car now....but if I did I would seriously consider upgrading fuel system and running e85 just to eliminate a well documented failure issue..... e85 costs 70% less that race fuel, but you burn 30% more...well worth it i’d say.....even if your burn rate is 20-25 gallons per hour.....it’s cheap insurance.....Casper at 265whp burned around 10-12 per hour....at track prices of $8...let’s call that $100 per hour. The e85 much more powerful race is around $60 per hour...Casper power level would be at most 16 or $50 per hour.

I recall gt3 cups at the 25hour fueled once per hour....with a 100L cell.....I was told they burn 20 gallons per hour of 100 octane....easy $200 per hour fuel. Nobody said racing was cheap
Old 05-12-2018, 06:08 PM
  #2  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,453
Received 2,071 Likes on 1,183 Posts
Default

Todd's twin turbo was designed from the start to run on e85.
Old 05-12-2018, 06:26 PM
  #3  
IcemanG17
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,265
Received 71 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
Todd's twin turbo was designed from the start to run on e85.
exactly.....the near 1000whp 5L that runs 10’s. Probably gets 15mpg on e85 too. My friends gtr gets around 18 on e85
Old 05-12-2018, 06:49 PM
  #4  
Speedtoys
Rennlist Member
 
Speedtoys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 13,582
Received 1,034 Likes on 623 Posts
Default

"eliminate a well documented failure issue"

The issue is attempting to extract more power than you should be trying to.


Not the fuel.
Old 05-12-2018, 07:53 PM
  #5  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,453
Received 2,071 Likes on 1,183 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Speedtoys
"eliminate a well documented failure issue"

The issue is attempting to extract more power than you should be trying to.

Not the fuel.
Smokey Yunick used to say, if you put all the engines damaged by detonation on one pile, and every other possible engine failure combined on another pile, the detonation pile will be significantly larger.

And he's right.

Detonation is not just trying to extract more power, not by a long shot.
Common misconception is "Oh just turn down the timing until it stops knocking (or turn up the fuel)......." while that can work fine on street cars that don't really spend a lot of time under full load. Tuning a race car is a whole different animal, and even the pros get is wrong.
It's almost impossible for us mere mortals to simulate every possible scenario on the dyno, this is where an experienced tuner comes in.

E85 is an amazing fuel for making power. The primary drawback is more difficulty tuning it since the percentage of ethanol per fill-up can vary, so you should use a fuel meter to register how much ethanol is going into the combustion chamber and know how to tune the maps accordingly.

Turbo Todd's tuning partner, Luke Stubbs @ Beyond Redline in Green Bay, has converted quite a few cars to e85. There really is no comparison to building a car around e85 to pump unleaded.
Old 05-12-2018, 08:00 PM
  #6  
Speedtoys
Rennlist Member
 
Speedtoys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 13,582
Received 1,034 Likes on 623 Posts
Default

Im just saying that E85 just lets you abuse the design and create more interesting failures. E85 is not a cure for doing it wrong.
Old 05-12-2018, 08:05 PM
  #7  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,453
Received 2,071 Likes on 1,183 Posts
Default

It absolutely increases the margin of error.

I don't see where he was saying you could build a sh*tty motor and still perform well just because of e85 though.

Other benefits outside of the tuning aspect is temperature. e85 cars can run ridiculously cool. So much so Todd has to worry about condensation since he never comes close to reaching 210F with his motor oil. He doesn't want to either.....
Old 05-12-2018, 08:24 PM
  #8  
Speedtoys
Rennlist Member
 
Speedtoys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 13,582
Received 1,034 Likes on 623 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
It absolutely increases the margin of error.

I don't see where he was saying you could build a sh*tty motor and still perform well just because of e85 though.

Other benefits outside of the tuning aspect is temperature. e85 cars can run ridiculously cool. So much so Todd has to worry about condensation since he never comes close to reaching 210F with his motor oil. He doesn't want to either.....

But not error that over exuberant and rush to output humans -will- create.

I dont believe he said that either..
Old 05-12-2018, 08:28 PM
  #9  
bronto
Drifting
 
bronto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 2,808
Received 48 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Is E85 safe to run through our street 928's? I've always considered it evil for my '79 simply because it didn't exist when my car was engineered and therefore wasn't designed with it in mind. But since then it's had a top-end refresh, and I would imagine the components used would be more E85 compatible. What's the scoop?
Old 05-12-2018, 09:38 PM
  #10  
The Forgotten On
Rennlist Member
 
The Forgotten On's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Thousand Oaks California
Posts: 4,930
Received 297 Likes on 245 Posts
Default

The engine will run it just fine. The issue is that the rubber fuel lines aren't rated to handle it. So those need to be changed.

The main issue is tuning being that E"85" can vary quite significantly in concentration between batches so a flex fuel sensor needs to be fitted to account for this.

This also means a modern engine management system needs to be used.
Old 05-12-2018, 09:43 PM
  #11  
bronto
Drifting
 
bronto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 2,808
Received 48 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The Forgotten On
The engine will run it just fine. The issue is that the rubber fuel lines aren't rated to handle it. So those need to be changed.

The main issue is tuning being that E"85" can vary quite significantly in concentration between batches so a flex fuel sensor needs to be fitted to account for this.

This also means a modern engine management system needs to be used.
... so not a good choice for a motor with just CIS injection. No brain in my car.
Old 05-12-2018, 09:51 PM
  #12  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

In my opinion, pure street cars should run on pump gasoline in the US since that allows for convenient fill ups. Hobby cars should run on whatever the owner wants. Race cars should run on the fuel that makes the car fastest within the rules (or at least without getting caught).

In a knock limited 5L turbo car, E85 can be worth hundreds of hp over pump gas. The power advantage is not imaginary in a forced induction setting. Severely knock limited setups may get 1/3 more hp. For a normally aspirated car, the gains are much smaller (of the order if 10%) and there’s arguably more hardware changes required to get there than in a turbo car where you just change the wastegate settings, make sure that fuel system can flow enough, and that the spark has the energy to ignite the cold, wet charge. A lot of the other issues have to already be solved even for a US pump gas turbo car, because they blend in ethanol even to the regular pump gas here.

For a pure street car, I’d run ethanol if I’d live in Brazil. Cold start would not be a problem and fuel would be available everywhere. In the US Northeast, I wouldn’t want to us ethanol because it’s not generally available and cold start is a lot harder with ethanol. Running it very rich when cranking cold is great with gasoline, but doesn’t work that well with ethanol.


Last edited by ptuomov; 05-13-2018 at 10:39 AM.
Old 05-13-2018, 07:44 PM
  #13  
IcemanG17
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,265
Received 71 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Interesting insights to what I did or didn’t say....I will clarify

about e85 cooling....yes it’s significant......my friends gtr runs so cool above 1000whp he questions why he has intercoolers..... heat causes detonation...e85 lowers heat.....I’d call that a double win

the single most powerful 928 ever runs e85 and is a street car.....the man that built it knows way more about engines-boost-power than I ever will....I doubt he chose e85 to be PC....

other than low cost vs race fuel (which isn’t street legal) the single best strength of e85 is the safety margin....on NA street cars, prolly not worth it...on boosted 928 worth considering.....also true on race cars...it’s not really about the power gain as it is lower cost and cheap insurance.....

there have been many successful race 928 that run normal or race gas.....as far as I know George does, Tim Dey, Devek did....mark K still runs 91 octane...I ran 91 in all my race 928....sean and Rick petty still do.. if I was in the game today, would I run 91.....in a low CR lemons car yes......anything above 10-1 NO....the risk reward just isn’t there.....
Old 05-14-2018, 09:31 AM
  #14  
SwayBar
Drifting
 
SwayBar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago Bears
Posts: 3,476
Received 291 Likes on 198 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bronto
... so not a good choice for a motor with just CIS injection. No brain in my car.
Correct, not a good choice for any stock, NA car for that matter. There is nothing to be gained by doing so.
Old 05-14-2018, 12:11 PM
  #15  
Catorce
Banned
 
Catorce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,609
Received 73 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

E85 is great.....if you can get it. Here in South Orange County, the nearest E85 is almost 25 miles away - too far for a regular fill up. If it was 2 minutes away, most of my performance builds would be running it.


Quick Reply: 928 engine death.....knock....answer. E85



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:55 PM.