Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

S4 throttle body butterfly thoughts

Old 01-08-2018, 09:48 AM
  #1  
Marti
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Marti's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Posts: 632
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Default S4 throttle body butterfly thoughts

Hi

I was looking for feedback on increasing the size of the throttle body butterfly on the S4/GT/GTS inlet manifold for a S4 engine running the Colin’s cams and MSMD headers with a X pipe and remaining exhaust system being standard. The car is also running shark tuner and uprated injectors.

As bolt on replacement performance manifolds are not quite there yet I am working on modifying the S4 manifold to clean up the airflow as best I can which I hope will help. I am trying to investigate options on fitting a larger butterfly. I believe the existing butterfly is 75mm and some people have increased this size, i would like to know what size is possible and where parts are sourced

I am working on the theory that with the increased airflow now being sought by the engine that this may be worth doing especially since I have the parts off the car at present.

Many thanks
Old 01-08-2018, 10:53 AM
  #2  
SwayBar
Drifting
 
SwayBar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago Bears
Posts: 3,476
Received 291 Likes on 198 Posts
Default

With those cams, x, and proper tune, you can expect 330+ rwhp with a 5-speed.

However, after reading many threads on this topic, as well as being in-process of mocking-up an intake, I wouldn't waste any time/money on the stock intake, including a bigger TB.

Runners 5 and 8 are mangled beyond repair with their 180 degree bends. Runners 2 and 6 flow the best, thus run the leanest for batch fire, and everyone is forced to tune for them which includes pulling timing to minimize knocking on those cylinders. Lots of hp is left on the table as a result.

IMO, this knocking is the root cause of 2/6 bearing failure on the 32v, and not the oiling system.

A completely new intake which allows all cylinders to fill equally will enable a much more aggressive tune while being safer at the same time.
Old 01-08-2018, 11:27 AM
  #3  
KenRudd
Drifting
 
KenRudd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 2,080
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Don't forget to polish your plate...
Old 01-08-2018, 12:15 PM
  #4  
Strosek Ultra
Rennlist Member
 
Strosek Ultra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mostly in my workshop located in Sweden.
Posts: 2,226
Received 442 Likes on 244 Posts
Default



https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...ughout-30.html
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...reets-118.html
I made a larger number of 80mm butterfly valves for Tuomo (Ptuomov). He might sell you a valve. He has got all the tooling for the machining of the throttle valve housing.
Åke
Old 01-08-2018, 12:19 PM
  #5  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,496
Received 631 Likes on 489 Posts
Default

http://www.maxbore.com/

like $120, quick turnaround, nice work.

i had a 944 TB taken from 55 to 60mm there.

i had a 928S3 tb in hand a while back, it looked like it could go bigger (80?)
Old 01-08-2018, 04:13 PM
  #6  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket
http://www.maxbore.com/

like $120, quick turnaround, nice work.

i had a 944 TB taken from 55 to 60mm there.

i had a 928S3 tb in hand a while back, it looked like it could go bigger (80?)
Have you asked him to do 928 S4 tb?
Old 01-08-2018, 04:41 PM
  #7  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,496
Received 631 Likes on 489 Posts
Default

no but the hole should drill the same despite the weird shape of the S4 TB "housing"

they did somebody's 928 TB up to 82mm (1/3 down)
http://www.maxbore.com/europeanpictures.html
Old 01-08-2018, 04:44 PM
  #8  
SeanR
Rennlist Member
 
SeanR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 35,700
Received 498 Likes on 266 Posts
Default

Sterling did his a good sized larger than stock. Once he changed up to ITB's he sold his to Roger and I installed it in his GTS. Would like to have one for my car also.
Old 01-08-2018, 04:54 PM
  #9  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SeanR
Sterling did his a good sized larger than stock. Once he changed up to ITB's he sold his to Roger and I installed it in his GTS. Would like to have one for my car also.
The problem is that just replacing the throttle valve isn't going to increase flow much. And neither does just welding and porting the throttle body without replacing the valve. One needs to do both, and that's extremely time consuming. Then, there's the flow demand chart that lists how much hp one should expect to gain from the change, which isn't much for near-stock motors. Take a look at what Ake posted in two threads on this, plus my estimates of hp gain.
Old 01-08-2018, 04:56 PM
  #10  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket
no but the hole should drill the same despite the weird shape of the S4 TB "housing"

they did somebody's 928 TB up to 82mm (1/3 down)
http://www.maxbore.com/europeanpictures.html
His setup can't do a S4 throttle body. I asked.
Old 01-08-2018, 04:58 PM
  #11  
SeanR
Rennlist Member
 
SeanR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 35,700
Received 498 Likes on 266 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ptuomov
The problem is that just replacing the throttle valve isn't going to increase flow much. And neither does just welding and porting the throttle body without replacing the valve. One needs to do both, and that's extremely time consuming. Then, there's the flow demand chart that lists how much hp one should expect to gain from the change, which isn't much for near-stock motors. Take a look at what Ake posted in two threads on this, plus my estimates of hp gain.

Oh heck with all that. I just want one so I can say "Hey, I've got a large throttle body"
Old 01-08-2018, 05:01 PM
  #12  
Marti
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Marti's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Posts: 632
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SwayBar
With those cams, x, and proper tune, you can expect 330+ rwhp with a 5-speed.

However, after reading many threads on this topic, as well as being in-process of mocking-up an intake, I wouldn't waste any time/money on the stock intake, including a bigger TB.

Runners 5 and 8 are mangled beyond repair with their 180 degree bends. Runners 2 and 6 flow the best, thus run the leanest for batch fire, and everyone is forced to tune for them which includes pulling timing to minimize knocking on those cylinders. Lots of hp is left on the table as a result.

IMO, this knocking is the root cause of 2/6 bearing failure on the 32v, and not the oiling system.

A completely new intake which allows all cylinders to fill equally will enable a much more aggressive tune while being safer at the same time.
I generally dislike the standard S4 manifold to, however until there is a ready replacement for it I can only really tinker with this to make what ever improvements possible. I am hoping GB will move to some limited production version of the manifolds he has been testing
Old 01-08-2018, 05:03 PM
  #13  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SeanR
Oh heck with all that. I just want one so I can say "Hey, I've got a large throttle body"
Now, I do understand and approve of that motivation!
Old 01-08-2018, 05:03 PM
  #14  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,099
Received 330 Likes on 199 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SwayBar
Runners 2 and 6 flow the best, thus run the leanest for batch fire, and everyone is forced to tune for them which includes pulling timing to minimize knocking on those cylinders. Lots of hp is left on the table as a result.

IMO, this knocking is the root cause of 2/6 bearing failure on the 32v, and not the oiling system.
Basic by-cylinder retard tuning patch (for ST.BINs):
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...ard-patch.html
Old 01-08-2018, 05:16 PM
  #15  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Here’s what I believe. The 928 cylinder filling and temperatures are different depending on whether one runs stock exhaust manifolds or long-tube headers. Most of the filling imbalances, residual gas fractions, AFR variations, and timing requirement differences are caused by exhaust blowdown interference inside the stock exhaust manifolds. The original poster in this thread will run headers so most of the imbalances at peak power will be automatically resolved by the headers. At mid range rpms, I’d expect the long intake runner cylinders (2, 3, 6, and 7) to fill a little better but at peak power the intake runner length shouldn’t be cause a huge imbalance. Opinions vary on this, of course.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: S4 throttle body butterfly thoughts



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:55 AM.