Rennlist - Porsche Discussion Forums

Rennlist - Porsche Discussion Forums (https://rennlist.com/forums/)
-   928 Forum (https://rennlist.com/forums/928-forum-69/)
-   -   S4 throttle body butterfly thoughts (https://rennlist.com/forums/928-forum/1042326-s4-throttle-body-butterfly-thoughts.html)

Marti 01-08-2018 09:48 AM

S4 throttle body butterfly thoughts
 
Hi

I was looking for feedback on increasing the size of the throttle body butterfly on the S4/GT/GTS inlet manifold for a S4 engine running the Colin’s cams and MSMD headers with a X pipe and remaining exhaust system being standard. The car is also running shark tuner and uprated injectors.

As bolt on replacement performance manifolds are not quite there yet I am working on modifying the S4 manifold to clean up the airflow as best I can which I hope will help. I am trying to investigate options on fitting a larger butterfly. I believe the existing butterfly is 75mm and some people have increased this size, i would like to know what size is possible and where parts are sourced

I am working on the theory that with the increased airflow now being sought by the engine that this may be worth doing especially since I have the parts off the car at present.

Many thanks

SwayBar 01-08-2018 10:53 AM

With those cams, x, and proper tune, you can expect 330+ rwhp with a 5-speed.

However, after reading many threads on this topic, as well as being in-process of mocking-up an intake, I wouldn't waste any time/money on the stock intake, including a bigger TB.

Runners 5 and 8 are mangled beyond repair with their 180 degree bends. Runners 2 and 6 flow the best, thus run the leanest for batch fire, and everyone is forced to tune for them which includes pulling timing to minimize knocking on those cylinders. Lots of hp is left on the table as a result.

IMO, this knocking is the root cause of 2/6 bearing failure on the 32v, and not the oiling system.

A completely new intake which allows all cylinders to fill equally will enable a much more aggressive tune while being safer at the same time.

KenRudd 01-08-2018 11:27 AM

Don't forget to polish your plate...https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...f4646a57a.jpeg

Strosek Ultra 01-08-2018 12:15 PM

https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...820c5b622a.jpg
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...88155670a9.jpg
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...ughout-30.html
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...reets-118.html
I made a larger number of 80mm butterfly valves for Tuomo (Ptuomov). He might sell you a valve. He has got all the tooling for the machining of the throttle valve housing.
Åke

V2Rocket 01-08-2018 12:19 PM

http://www.maxbore.com/

like $120, quick turnaround, nice work.

i had a 944 TB taken from 55 to 60mm there.

i had a 928S3 tb in hand a while back, it looked like it could go bigger (80?)

ptuomov 01-08-2018 04:13 PM


Originally Posted by V2Rocket (Post 14717659)
http://www.maxbore.com/

like $120, quick turnaround, nice work.

i had a 944 TB taken from 55 to 60mm there.

i had a 928S3 tb in hand a while back, it looked like it could go bigger (80?)

Have you asked him to do 928 S4 tb?

V2Rocket 01-08-2018 04:41 PM

no but the hole should drill the same despite the weird shape of the S4 TB "housing"

they did somebody's 928 TB up to 82mm (1/3 down)
http://www.maxbore.com/europeanpictures.html

SeanR 01-08-2018 04:44 PM

Sterling did his a good sized larger than stock. Once he changed up to ITB's he sold his to Roger and I installed it in his GTS. Would like to have one for my car also.

ptuomov 01-08-2018 04:54 PM


Originally Posted by SeanR (Post 14718239)
Sterling did his a good sized larger than stock. Once he changed up to ITB's he sold his to Roger and I installed it in his GTS. Would like to have one for my car also.

The problem is that just replacing the throttle valve isn't going to increase flow much. And neither does just welding and porting the throttle body without replacing the valve. One needs to do both, and that's extremely time consuming. Then, there's the flow demand chart that lists how much hp one should expect to gain from the change, which isn't much for near-stock motors. Take a look at what Ake posted in two threads on this, plus my estimates of hp gain.

ptuomov 01-08-2018 04:56 PM


Originally Posted by V2Rocket (Post 14718230)
no but the hole should drill the same despite the weird shape of the S4 TB "housing"

they did somebody's 928 TB up to 82mm (1/3 down)
http://www.maxbore.com/europeanpictures.html

His setup can't do a S4 throttle body. I asked.

SeanR 01-08-2018 04:58 PM


Originally Posted by ptuomov (Post 14718261)
The problem is that just replacing the throttle valve isn't going to increase flow much. And neither does just welding and porting the throttle body without replacing the valve. One needs to do both, and that's extremely time consuming. Then, there's the flow demand chart that lists how much hp one should expect to gain from the change, which isn't much for near-stock motors. Take a look at what Ake posted in two threads on this, plus my estimates of hp gain.


Oh heck with all that. I just want one so I can say "Hey, I've got a large throttle body"

Marti 01-08-2018 05:01 PM


Originally Posted by SwayBar (Post 14717493)
With those cams, x, and proper tune, you can expect 330+ rwhp with a 5-speed.

However, after reading many threads on this topic, as well as being in-process of mocking-up an intake, I wouldn't waste any time/money on the stock intake, including a bigger TB.

Runners 5 and 8 are mangled beyond repair with their 180 degree bends. Runners 2 and 6 flow the best, thus run the leanest for batch fire, and everyone is forced to tune for them which includes pulling timing to minimize knocking on those cylinders. Lots of hp is left on the table as a result.

IMO, this knocking is the root cause of 2/6 bearing failure on the 32v, and not the oiling system.

A completely new intake which allows all cylinders to fill equally will enable a much more aggressive tune while being safer at the same time.

I generally dislike the standard S4 manifold to, however until there is a ready replacement for it I can only really tinker with this to make what ever improvements possible. I am hoping GB will move to some limited production version of the manifolds he has been testing :)

ptuomov 01-08-2018 05:03 PM


Originally Posted by SeanR (Post 14718273)
Oh heck with all that. I just want one so I can say "Hey, I've got a large throttle body"

Now, I do understand and approve of that motivation!

PorKen 01-08-2018 05:03 PM


Originally Posted by SwayBar (Post 14717493)
Runners 2 and 6 flow the best, thus run the leanest for batch fire, and everyone is forced to tune for them which includes pulling timing to minimize knocking on those cylinders. Lots of hp is left on the table as a result.

IMO, this knocking is the root cause of 2/6 bearing failure on the 32v, and not the oiling system.

Basic by-cylinder retard tuning patch (for ST.BINs):
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...ard-patch.html

ptuomov 01-08-2018 05:16 PM

Here’s what I believe. The 928 cylinder filling and temperatures are different depending on whether one runs stock exhaust manifolds or long-tube headers. Most of the filling imbalances, residual gas fractions, AFR variations, and timing requirement differences are caused by exhaust blowdown interference inside the stock exhaust manifolds. The original poster in this thread will run headers so most of the imbalances at peak power will be automatically resolved by the headers. At mid range rpms, I’d expect the long intake runner cylinders (2, 3, 6, and 7) to fill a little better but at peak power the intake runner length shouldn’t be cause a huge imbalance. Opinions vary on this, of course.


All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:08 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands