Adapter for Heater Valve
#1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Adapter for Heater Valve
This simple part stopped my Twin Screw from going to HELL on Saturday
PET calls it out as: Adapter Cyl 1-4
Went for a 6 mile shake down ride after connecting up some monitoring gauges into the cockpit.
Half a block from home that metal sleeve came "un-glued"
I hear Porsche still glues them on newer up to '08 911's (GT3's?) and owners are/need to get them welded if they want to track the car's.
Did some searching, is JB Weld still the recommended fix or should I get it TIG welded?
Thanks in advance,
Dave
PET calls it out as: Adapter Cyl 1-4
Went for a 6 mile shake down ride after connecting up some monitoring gauges into the cockpit.
Half a block from home that metal sleeve came "un-glued"
I hear Porsche still glues them on newer up to '08 911's (GT3's?) and owners are/need to get them welded if they want to track the car's.
Did some searching, is JB Weld still the recommended fix or should I get it TIG welded?
Thanks in advance,
Dave
Last edited by davek9; 08-06-2017 at 08:03 PM.
#5
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Thanks Seth, wasn't sure if the older cast one piece part was still available, I'll contact Roger tomorrow and get one into next day mail if he's has them in stock
Then take the two I have to my TIG guy who is doing the ones on the 911, I'm not that good using my own TIG unit yet
Dave
Then take the two I have to my TIG guy who is doing the ones on the 911, I'm not that good using my own TIG unit yet
Dave
#6
Rennlist Member
#7
I've JB welded several with no failures so far. I've not had to order any new ones as I bought a handful of the one piece ones many years back so no clue what they come as. Will ask Rog today.
Trending Topics
#8
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,328
Received 1,543 Likes
on
1,007 Posts
The one-piece part is what you get from Porsche when you order. At least it was about three months ago.
re: GT3. I guess the rear-engine engineers don't talk to the front-engine engineers. Makes no sense. In other a$$-engined news, the 991s have problems with infant mortality on vacuum change-over valves. These are exactly the same as the vacuum valve for the resonance flap on '87+ with a modern electrical connector. I think I've seen one flappy solenoid valve failure. Robust part for us. Chinese for 991s?
re: GT3. I guess the rear-engine engineers don't talk to the front-engine engineers. Makes no sense. In other a$$-engined news, the 991s have problems with infant mortality on vacuum change-over valves. These are exactly the same as the vacuum valve for the resonance flap on '87+ with a modern electrical connector. I think I've seen one flappy solenoid valve failure. Robust part for us. Chinese for 991s?
#9
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,328
Received 1,543 Likes
on
1,007 Posts
Follow-up: at this point I don't wait for them to fail. They get changed preemptively when I find them.
Does anyone know exactly when the one-piece part became standard? Sometime before '90 and after '87 is certain.
Does anyone know exactly when the one-piece part became standard? Sometime before '90 and after '87 is certain.
#10
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Thanks Dave and Sean for adding to the conversation.
Dave, I was under the impression that the one piece adapter is an "older" part that was superseded by the two piece bonded adapter.
Thanks,
Dave K
Dave, I was under the impression that the one piece adapter is an "older" part that was superseded by the two piece bonded adapter.
Thanks,
Dave K
#11
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Adirondack Mountains, New York
Posts: 2,398
Received 309 Likes
on
161 Posts
I know it's heresy to suggest a MacGyver-style approach, but would doing something to alter the smooth "co-axiality" (as in the tuning slide of a trumpet) to prevent a gusher, at least? A whack with a punch, or a little squeeze, perhaps. It's easy to mess up trumpet slides this way.
#12
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,328
Received 1,543 Likes
on
1,007 Posts
I have multiple data points for '87 and '90+. Curiously, I don't see many '88s or '89s, but numerous '87s and '90+. I've two '90 GT engines in the garage now, along with my '91 and all three had the one piece from the factory.
I have no data for pre-'87.
If this archeology gets serious, I can check a '93 and '94 today. Another '94 on Thursday and a '95 on Saturday.
#13
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
I know of at least one '93 GTS, two '87 and two '88's that I've worked on, all having the two piece and have never see a one piece on an '85 - '86.
Wonder what the cost of a Billet part would be
Thanks,
Dave
Wonder what the cost of a Billet part would be
Thanks,
Dave
#14
Rennlist Member
For what it is worth, I bought a new one piece water adapter from Roger back in the middle of June.
928 104 713 02 Water Fitting Adapter Cylinder 1 to 4.
$30.14
WAY cheaper than billet.
928 104 713 02 Water Fitting Adapter Cylinder 1 to 4.
$30.14
WAY cheaper than billet.
#15
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
I haven't had any issues with the one that came on my 12/88 build '89 car. Now I need to go look.
For those contemplating a JBWeld "fix", perhaps the most critical requirements start with "C": Cleanliness, Clearance, and Concentric. The first is obvious. The second is a reminder that there needs to be enough room all the way around the insert for a film of the epoxy. The original fitment is a slight interference fit, and the tube pops out when there isn't enough interference. The last "C" is concentric, as in the hole in the casting needs to be round, the tube needs to be round, and with the second "C" the clearance needs to be relatively even all the way around.
Or just buy the correct $30 one-piece fitting from your favorite 928 parts purveyor. Ship/delivery time is only marginally greater than the prep and cure time for the temporary glue-up. And you needed some other stuff anyway.
For those contemplating a JBWeld "fix", perhaps the most critical requirements start with "C": Cleanliness, Clearance, and Concentric. The first is obvious. The second is a reminder that there needs to be enough room all the way around the insert for a film of the epoxy. The original fitment is a slight interference fit, and the tube pops out when there isn't enough interference. The last "C" is concentric, as in the hole in the casting needs to be round, the tube needs to be round, and with the second "C" the clearance needs to be relatively even all the way around.
Or just buy the correct $30 one-piece fitting from your favorite 928 parts purveyor. Ship/delivery time is only marginally greater than the prep and cure time for the temporary glue-up. And you needed some other stuff anyway.