Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

starter interference '83 vs. '87

Old 05-09-2017, 11:36 AM
  #16  
16again2009
Instructor
 
16again2009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I just went to the same hell you are going through on my 1988 924s. I tried the bosch sr62x but the wiring would not match up. I went to Oreilly 's auto parts and bought the Ultima R712321A. It was listed for an 1982 porsche 924 turbo(old style fat starter). Installed it and the problem is solved. I have had zero problems with it. This is a very frustrating problem. I broke the nose off of 3 of the skinny starters. Very expensive problem also. Good luck.
Old 04-18-2019, 09:57 AM
  #17  
jvandyke
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
jvandyke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'm back to this issue, blew up another starter. O'reilly lists R712357b now, is that the same as above? Pelican lists the same starter for all years so that's useless. I want to be sure I'm getting a fatty this time.
https://www.oreillyauto.com/shop/b/c.../924?q=Starter
Old 04-18-2019, 10:21 AM
  #18  
MAGK944
Nordschleife Master
 
MAGK944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 6,769
Received 295 Likes on 231 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jvandyke
I'm back to this issue, blew up another starter....
Are you sure you have the correct bellhousing on your engine? Could the po have put a turbo bellhousing instead of an na?

Turbo and na starters are the same and the bellhousings look identical, will physically swap over and the starters will look like they fit fine and will both turn the engine over. However the starter on each is positioned differently due to the na riding on 130 gear teeth and the turbo on 132 gear teeth.

So, if your bellhousing is wrong the starter teeth will not quite mesh correctly, it will turn and start likely with a jolt or two but the starter gear life will be vastly reduced.
Old 04-18-2019, 11:18 AM
  #19  
jvandyke
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
jvandyke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I doubt the bell housing is a turbo, the engine is from an '83 944, the car is an '87 924s. I now think the fuel pressure regulator is leaking into the vacuum line causing starting issues and kick back, I ordered a new FPR and I also need a new starter, again, I just want the right one, I may have had the right one all along, I don't know but it see it's listed as for a 924s and late model 944 so it likely HASN'T been the fatty
Old 04-19-2019, 12:52 PM
  #20  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 533 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jvandyke
I doubt the bell housing is a turbo, the engine is from an '83 944, the car is an '87 924s. I now think the fuel pressure regulator is leaking into the vacuum line causing starting issues and kick back, I ordered a new FPR and I also need a new starter, again, I just want the right one, I may have had the right one all along, I don't know but it see it's listed as for a 924s and late model 944 so it likely HASN'T been the fatty
Seems like your issue is either (1) mismatched mechanical parts, (2) wicked starter kick-back supplemented with extra fuel, or (3) cheap starters from O'Reilly's and the like. My random suggestions would be to just wipe O'Reilly's and similar suppliers out of your mind when it comes to starters for this car. I went through so many similar rebuilds I can't tell you. They were just rebuilt so cheaply (not to mention wet sticky oily paint), they wouldn't last more than a year or two. One of them actually fried the cable going to the starter -- turned it to ashes overnight... The Bosch rebuilds are very much worth finding -- they come in a Bosch-branded box and look/feel new, and mine has now outlasted all the others I tried combined. When you say "fatty" do you mean the M198 option starter? Curiously, PET shows the same part number from 83 to '89 for the 944 NA and turbo -- i.e., 951 604 101 00. The higher power M198 option is the only other one shown. (As an aside, one might think the higher power version are MORE likely to break gears etc if the motor kicks back....).

Plenty of folks have had leaky FPR's and leaky injectors, etc., without blowing up starters, and yours probably hasn't been leaking for years, so I wouldn't check the box on finding your solution until time proves you right. Could be as simple as cheap rebuilds, but I'd make quadruple sure your bellhousing and starter ring gear are compatible. As for starter kick-back based on errant speed/ref sensor pulses, I'd point out the early DMEs used a different conditioning circuit for those sensor pulses. Was that circuit as good as the dedicated chip they developed for the later DME's? I don't know... But if you have an '83 DME, it's one thing to consider, along with ensuring the wiring harness from the sensors to the DME is in very good shape. Those are internally shielded cables, and they are a known failure point on these cars.

Last edited by Tom M'Guinn; 04-19-2019 at 04:39 PM.
Old 04-19-2019, 03:55 PM
  #21  
jvandyke
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
jvandyke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

okay, I'm learning, I'll try to get at the bell housing numbers with a camera or something
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsc...fferences.html

I suppose I can count teeth on the ring gear, someone has been in there with a very heavy hand so anything is possible, could be mismatched flywheel/bell housing as you say. They swapped the engine at some point, I can't imagine an '87 924s ended up with '83 944 block, non turbo bell housing but a turbo ring gear??, or standard ring gear and a turbo bell housing, but well, who knows. I will investigate this.
Old 04-19-2019, 05:10 PM
  #22  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 533 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

On that pelican post, beware that lots of cast parts have a casting number that are different from the actual/official Porsche part number. That probably explains the confusion on that thread and serves as a warning against using those numbers to identify what part you have...
Old 04-22-2019, 03:50 PM
  #23  
jvandyke
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
jvandyke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

ordered another starter, "supposed" to be the pre '85 944 version. I also pulled the plugs, fuel fouled, badly, standing fuel in the cylinders, FPR maybe? Maybe related? Off to recheck FPR tests, I think I have to jumper a relay to trigger the pump and see if the FPR's vac line is dumping fuel
Old 04-30-2019, 12:14 AM
  #24  
jvandyke
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
jvandyke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I thought I posted a while ago, don't see it. New starter arrived, it's the older version so that's good. Installed and she fired right up. Here's some pictures of the later model, the smaller one, for post '85 944 and the bigger one for pre '85. Supposedly the fat one is one you want, less susceptible to kickback. Most vendor's don't differentiate so I searched multiple vendors until I found one (partsgeek) that reported different numbers for early 944 and later. I bought the one that came up for early 944 and it arrived as the fatter one. Hopefully it's the magic bullet.

nose totally blown off this "later" starter, the smaller diameter one

body is smaller, about 2 3/4" diameter, this is the "later" starter, we have destroyed three of these

early starter, 3.75" diameter

early on top, later below

early on top, later below

Last edited by jvandyke; 04-30-2019 at 09:40 AM.
Old 04-30-2019, 12:23 AM
  #25  
jvandyke
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
jvandyke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I swear I posted this earlier too, oh well. I did a fuel line test, FPR and injectors all check out fine. As above, the fatty starter seems (only one start so far) to work great. Weather sucks around here but the car will come out this weekend and hopefully we're good to go. Fixed odometer and redid all gauge lighting this winter, very anxious to drive the thing.


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: starter interference '83 vs. '87



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:49 AM.