Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

N/A Horsepower

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-05-2012, 11:59 PM
  #1  
xsbank
Racer
Thread Starter
 
xsbank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sechelt BC
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 28 Posts
Default N/A Horsepower

Porsche Canada says the N/A has 150 hp with a cat and 163 hp without. Hand me my sawzall, will you?
Old 03-06-2012, 12:04 AM
  #2  
MAGK944
Nordschleife Master
 
MAGK944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 6,769
Received 295 Likes on 231 Posts
Default

That is true, but the cars built without the cat (ROW) also had 10.6cr pistons, a reprogrammed dme and ran on higher octane fuel.
Old 03-06-2012, 03:33 AM
  #3  
rgs944
Drifting
 
rgs944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 3,334
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Getting rid of an old cat that may be plugged might not be a bad idea.
Old 03-06-2012, 09:41 AM
  #4  
nasty9er
Racer
 
nasty9er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Delaware
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i pulled the cat on my 924s when i did the headers. (the cat was only a year old) and i did notice improvement in topend speed but you do lose lowend torque(no back pressure). when inspection time came around i had to put the old setup back in and ended liking it more with the cat in so now my plan is to splice in a hiflow racing cat into my delete pipe. my 2 cent
Old 03-06-2012, 09:57 PM
  #5  
Geo
Race Director
 
Geo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 10,033
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by nasty9er
i pulled the cat on my 924s when i did the headers. (the cat was only a year old) and i did notice improvement in topend speed but you do lose lowend torque(no back pressure). when inspection time came around i had to put the old setup back in and ended liking it more with the cat in so now my plan is to splice in a hiflow racing cat into my delete pipe. my 2 cent
You changed two things at once: header and removed cat.

Reducing backpressure does not lower the torque. The header moved the powerband.

Reducing backpressure lowering torque is an old wives tale.
Old 03-06-2012, 09:58 PM
  #6  
Geo
Race Director
 
Geo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 10,033
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by MAGK944
That is true, but the cars built without the cat (ROW) also had 10.6cr pistons, a reprogrammed dme and ran on higher octane fuel.
This
Old 03-06-2012, 10:05 PM
  #7  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,497
Received 633 Likes on 490 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Geo
You changed two things at once: header and removed cat.

Reducing backpressure does not lower the torque. The header moved the powerband.

Reducing backpressure lowering torque is an old wives tale.
The internet is full of confusion between "backpressure" and "exhaust gas velocity"...

That said, I just found a 944 header collector pipe cut off after the O2 sensor. I'll let you all know if it feels any faster, or just louder
Old 03-06-2012, 10:08 PM
  #8  
nasty9er
Racer
 
nasty9er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Delaware
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Your 10,023 posts trump my 345. I stand corrected.

altered power band makes sense
Old 03-06-2012, 10:31 PM
  #9  
pcarfan944
Burning Brakes
 
pcarfan944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,046
Received 70 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Does removing the cat result in an increase in exhaust noise? I would gladly remove my cat as long as the engine/exhaust tone remained the same.

And, to set this straight, simply placing a straight pipe where the cat once was WILL NOT result in a loss of low end torque? In the eight years I've been here, I've never seen a clear cut answer to that question.
Old 03-06-2012, 10:49 PM
  #10  
Geo
Race Director
 
Geo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 10,033
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
The internet is full of confusion between "backpressure" and "exhaust gas velocity"...
Boy howdy.
Old 03-06-2012, 10:50 PM
  #11  
nasty9er
Racer
 
nasty9er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Delaware
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Mine is a louder with out the cat, but i do have an after market exhaust so it might be less noticeable in your case.

but thats just what i have experienced
Old 03-06-2012, 10:51 PM
  #12  
Geo
Race Director
 
Geo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 10,033
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by nasty9er
Your 10,023 posts trump my 345. I stand corrected.

altered power band makes sense
Post counts are BS. Don't rate anyone on that. Same for time on a board. Through the years I've seen so much incorrect "common knowledge" here it's funny.
Old 03-06-2012, 10:54 PM
  #13  
Geo
Race Director
 
Geo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 10,033
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Removing the cat does make most cars louder. But not more powerful.

The late Sport Compact Car magazine (when its editors were automotive engineers - I know a few of them) did a great dyno test with and without cat on a S13 240SX (similar engine to the 944). No change in power, and a loss of 1 ft/ft of torque w/o the cat and that is well within the degree of error on a chassis dyno.

Now, and old cat may cause problems, but a good cat (aftermarket is fine), especially a high flow cat (as most modern cats are), will NOT hurt performance.
Old 03-06-2012, 10:57 PM
  #14  
nasty9er
Racer
 
nasty9er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Delaware
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Geo
Post counts are BS. Don't rate anyone on that. Same for time on a board. Through the years I've seen so much incorrect "common knowledge" here it's funny.
it was a joke

Honestly i hate old wives and there story's.
Old 03-07-2012, 12:43 AM
  #15  
white924s
Rennlist Member
 
white924s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Menlo Park, CA
Posts: 2,174
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pcarfan944
Does removing the cat result in an increase in exhaust noise? I would gladly remove my cat as long as the engine/exhaust tone remained the same.

And, to set this straight, simply placing a straight pipe where the cat once was WILL NOT result in a loss of low end torque? In the eight years I've been here, I've never seen a clear cut answer to that question.
I have stock headers, no cat, and a Dansk muffler. This setup is a little bit louder than stock, but not much.

By comparison, before this I had an MSDS header, hi-flow cat, magnaflow muffler, and 3" tubes to connect it all) and it was substantially louder than stock.


Quick Reply: N/A Horsepower



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:39 AM.