Intake gasket leak, again.
#1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Background --
After increasing boost to 15psi with TiAl 38mm WG, Profec B Spec II EBC, Fabspeed 3" cat delete and cat-back exhaust, and 951Max chips (see signature for complete mod list), I had a general lean condition. My AutoMeter vac/boost gauge showed 19 in hg at warm idle, which seems pretty good, but since Russell told me that the chips were programmed to run richer than my dyno AFRs showed , there must be some other issue.
So I started to check for vacuum/boost leaks by pressurizing the intake system (through the j-boot). When I had only about 2lbs built, and lost that VERY quickly, I decided to go ahead and do the venturi delete and silicone vacuum lines. Just to be sure, I also replaced the ISV (ICV), thermo-vacuum valve (near the cv location -- has two vac lines for the purge system), added Laust's vacuum manifold with new aluminum sealing rings for the intake banjo bolt, new dipstick tube o-ring, new speed and reference sensors (because the old connectors disintegrated), new Victor Reinz intake manifold gaskets, and also new heater control valve and hoses.
After it was all back together, a new pressure test with soapy water and listening through a hose, indicated a substantial leak between the intake manifold and head at the #4 runner.![banghead](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/banghead.gif)
I pulled the IM again and checked for flatness/straightness with a metal straightedge. Head seemed perfect. IM had a little wobble, showing maybe .003" - .004" of light between the IM and straightedge. So, I had the IM resurfaced at a local machine shop after which it shows perfectly true with the straightedge. I reassembled everything using new Victor Reinz IM gaskets (with some high-tack spray on the IM side to hold them in place), and again had the same leak at the #4 runner. Can't build more than about two psi. Tried torqueing down the IM bolts (new from Paragon) a little more, then can't build any pressure at all. Soapy water test and hiss from #4 IM runner to head connection shows leak.![banghead](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/banghead.gif)
Both times I installed the IM, I tightened the IM-to-head bolts before tightening the support bolt near the TB or the support bolts near the oil filler. With the support bolts loose, the manifold was seated in the supports fully. I also tightened the IM bolts in stages (all finger-tight, then all snugged with a ratchet, then all tightened to roughly 15 lb/ft).
This doesn't make sense to me, since flat is flat, with new gaskets. All surfaces were perfectly clean. I'm not sure what else to do, short of using some rtv sealant (probably grey) on the gaskets. Is there some trick to ensuring correct mating? Am I missing something?
After increasing boost to 15psi with TiAl 38mm WG, Profec B Spec II EBC, Fabspeed 3" cat delete and cat-back exhaust, and 951Max chips (see signature for complete mod list), I had a general lean condition. My AutoMeter vac/boost gauge showed 19 in hg at warm idle, which seems pretty good, but since Russell told me that the chips were programmed to run richer than my dyno AFRs showed , there must be some other issue.
So I started to check for vacuum/boost leaks by pressurizing the intake system (through the j-boot). When I had only about 2lbs built, and lost that VERY quickly, I decided to go ahead and do the venturi delete and silicone vacuum lines. Just to be sure, I also replaced the ISV (ICV), thermo-vacuum valve (near the cv location -- has two vac lines for the purge system), added Laust's vacuum manifold with new aluminum sealing rings for the intake banjo bolt, new dipstick tube o-ring, new speed and reference sensors (because the old connectors disintegrated), new Victor Reinz intake manifold gaskets, and also new heater control valve and hoses.
After it was all back together, a new pressure test with soapy water and listening through a hose, indicated a substantial leak between the intake manifold and head at the #4 runner.
![banghead](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/banghead.gif)
I pulled the IM again and checked for flatness/straightness with a metal straightedge. Head seemed perfect. IM had a little wobble, showing maybe .003" - .004" of light between the IM and straightedge. So, I had the IM resurfaced at a local machine shop after which it shows perfectly true with the straightedge. I reassembled everything using new Victor Reinz IM gaskets (with some high-tack spray on the IM side to hold them in place), and again had the same leak at the #4 runner. Can't build more than about two psi. Tried torqueing down the IM bolts (new from Paragon) a little more, then can't build any pressure at all. Soapy water test and hiss from #4 IM runner to head connection shows leak.
![banghead](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/banghead.gif)
Both times I installed the IM, I tightened the IM-to-head bolts before tightening the support bolt near the TB or the support bolts near the oil filler. With the support bolts loose, the manifold was seated in the supports fully. I also tightened the IM bolts in stages (all finger-tight, then all snugged with a ratchet, then all tightened to roughly 15 lb/ft).
This doesn't make sense to me, since flat is flat, with new gaskets. All surfaces were perfectly clean. I'm not sure what else to do, short of using some rtv sealant (probably grey) on the gaskets. Is there some trick to ensuring correct mating? Am I missing something?
Last edited by cb951; 08-04-2008 at 07:38 PM.
#2
Hey Man
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Any chance there's a hairline crack in the intake flange at a bolt hole? I doubt the head would have a crack, especially on the intake side. I've never heard of the head/IM leaking like that especially after the testing and machining you done.
#3
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yeah, it's just bizarre. I didn't see any visible cracks, but I guess it's possible. But the soap bubbling seems to come from the gasket, though I imagine it's possible that it may be a crack leaking into the gasket area.
When I removed the IM the second time, I could see the water/soap soaked into the gasket on the under (head) side of the gasket on the outer (passenger) side of the gasket, indicating that the it seeped under the gasket.
Since it occured at the same spot even after resurfacing the IM, I'm afraid that it just might be a crack.
Is it worth it to have the IM x-rayed, or should I just get a used IM and have it resurfaced (about $50.)? (Btw, I just cleaned out the carbon in mine with a wire brush on a flex shaft connected to a drill, cleaned it up really well, and also re-seated and sealed the fitting for the banjo bolt.)
Could there be another issue besides a crack?
When I removed the IM the second time, I could see the water/soap soaked into the gasket on the under (head) side of the gasket on the outer (passenger) side of the gasket, indicating that the it seeped under the gasket.
Since it occured at the same spot even after resurfacing the IM, I'm afraid that it just might be a crack.
Is it worth it to have the IM x-rayed, or should I just get a used IM and have it resurfaced (about $50.)? (Btw, I just cleaned out the carbon in mine with a wire brush on a flex shaft connected to a drill, cleaned it up really well, and also re-seated and sealed the fitting for the banjo bolt.)
Could there be another issue besides a crack?
#4
Hey Man
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hopefully you will find the problem. I would just buy another IM. Even after getting it checked for cracks ($35)you would still need to weld repair it ($75) and that's iffy at best. There are so many used 951 manifolds floating around. I have 2 spares myself because I'm polishing one of them for that extra 15HP of bling
Hopefully it isn't a boogered up tapped hole in the head that releases tension under load. If it's damaged threads in the head a Helicoil is the best and only option.
![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Hopefully it isn't a boogered up tapped hole in the head that releases tension under load. If it's damaged threads in the head a Helicoil is the best and only option.
#6
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: St Louis, Missouri, USA
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Is there a chance there is something wrong with the intake support bracket - holding the side opposite the head the a bit high - which in turns means the bottom of the intake/head flange don't mate?
I wondered if there would be a low buck way to oring the intake, seems do-able...Bruce
I wondered if there would be a low buck way to oring the intake, seems do-able...Bruce
#7
Drifting
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think you may be chasing your tail a bit here. If you can pull 19inHG (pretty good) of vacuum, but can't build any boost I would start looking on the other side of the throttle body for leaks. Also start thinking about your turbo and wastegate.
Trending Topics
#8
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
After I did my first leaky pressure test, my gauge showed 17 inHG at warm idle. Apparently the test disturbed something.
Btw, I also resealed the TB and replaced the j-boot and EVERY other rubber hose and clamp in the intake system.
I think my very definite intake leak at #4 may have been there for a while, though I've never had any problems with idle or driveability.
#9
Drifting
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I see... Something still doesn't fit right for me. If you do in fact have a leak, the behavior of the AFR doesn't fit with what you are describing. Let's assume there is a leak. Under vac the engine will pull extra air from some point past the MAF/AFM, and you're right this will cause a lean condition. However, under boost, you will be blowing some of this metered air out of the leak and not into the engine, while still injecting the fuel that is measured by the MAF. This will cause the engine to run rich and not lean like your dyno graph.
Just doesn't add up for me...
HTH
Justin
Just doesn't add up for me...
HTH
Justin
#10
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I rechecked the surfaces for strightness and thought I found a high spot on the head, but I was mistaken. Another check revealed that my straightedge is too flexible and a slight curvature gave me a false reading. (Doh!) So, once again, flat is flat.
Since the leak is on the outer side (closer to the cam housing), it would seem that the manifold might be tilted slightly downward on the TB side. But the leak only occurs on the #4 port.![Confused](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/confused.gif)
Right now, I'm considering using some rtv, but just know that it would make removing the IM again all that much more difficult. And with my luck lately, the rtv won't solve the problem and I will have to remove it again.
What to do?...What to do?...
Since the leak is on the outer side (closer to the cam housing), it would seem that the manifold might be tilted slightly downward on the TB side. But the leak only occurs on the #4 port.
![Confused](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/confused.gif)
Right now, I'm considering using some rtv, but just know that it would make removing the IM again all that much more difficult. And with my luck lately, the rtv won't solve the problem and I will have to remove it again.
What to do?...What to do?...
#11
Nordschleife Master
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't think I can add anything to this but....
Aren't the bolts supposed to be torqued to 25ft lbs.?
Also, doesn't someone make a deadsoft copper gasket set for this? I know there are people with higher pressure than 15psi with no problems. Copper wouldn't go anywhere, and its soft enough to fill all the little imperfections in the aluminum.
Aren't the bolts supposed to be torqued to 25ft lbs.?
Also, doesn't someone make a deadsoft copper gasket set for this? I know there are people with higher pressure than 15psi with no problems. Copper wouldn't go anywhere, and its soft enough to fill all the little imperfections in the aluminum.
#13
Nordschleife Master
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hmm ok
Would the NA and turbo be different torque? I can't remember right off hand, but it seems like I torqued mine to 25. I could be wrong.
Yeah, copper is common on the exhaust. I've never seen them for intakes either. It just popped into my head, so I thought I would ask.
Would the NA and turbo be different torque? I can't remember right off hand, but it seems like I torqued mine to 25. I could be wrong.
Yeah, copper is common on the exhaust. I've never seen them for intakes either. It just popped into my head, so I thought I would ask.
#14
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Is there a chance there is something wrong with the intake support bracket - holding the side opposite the head the a bit high - which in turns means the bottom of the intake/head flange don't mate?
I wondered if there would be a low buck way to oring the intake, seems do-able...Bruce
I wondered if there would be a low buck way to oring the intake, seems do-able...Bruce
However, after a cooling system issue, the head warped at the rear and was milled a substantial amount (I don't know exactly how much), but not enough to warrant a thicker head gasket (all according to Powertech). Could the reduced head height be the issue? Especially in combination with the resurfaced IM...
Anyway...
Can the rear IM support bracket be ajusted? (I tried tapping it with a small hammer and block of wood. No change.) The Porsche PET illustration shows slotted holes. My biggest concern is being able to access and loosen the very rusted lower bolts. Is it possible without removing the turbo and/or downpipe?
I guess the alternative would be to shave down the pad on the IM where it sits on the support bracket.
#15
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Okay, I was able to loosen one of the two bolts and the bracket was loose enough to move. However, it seems that it was already at the lowest point. Still too high.
Looks like I'll have to either grind down the pad on the IM, or make some spacers for the IM to head mating.
Looks like I'll have to either grind down the pad on the IM, or make some spacers for the IM to head mating.