Notices
911 Turbo (930) Forum 1975-1989

fishy?

Old 02-06-2017, 10:10 PM
  #1  
oliver bloom
4th Gear
Thread Starter
 
oliver bloom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default fishy?

Firstly let me say hi to all, as I have just registered -after years of stealthily perusing- the forum. Going through an aggressive mid-life crisis phase, I am looking to add a 930 to my life and realise a childhood dream (a cliché but clichés become such for a reason).

Long story short, as I have been surfing classifieds in the UK a newly advertised 79 930 popped up. First impressions from the photography and narrative were impressive. Then I looked at the posted serials and they look odd:
Chassis: 911930xxxx & Engine: 639xxxx

On first inspection I would say these are from a 911SC but I am no expert and definitely do not know of any special numbering conventions that Porsche may have used back then for RHD cars. Would be surprised though!

Any thoughts???
Old 02-07-2017, 02:05 PM
  #2  
Toby Pennycuff
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Toby Pennycuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,243
Received 142 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

930 VINs for 1979 models start with 930980xxxx where "xxxx" is a serialized production number. 930 motor numbers for 1979 should start with either 679xxxx (RoW cars) or 689xxxx (US cars). "xxxx", like the VIN is a serialized production number.

The first six of your VIN would indicate that the car is a 1979 911SC coupe if I read the decoder specs correctly (my Morgan book is at home).

Toby
Old 02-07-2017, 08:54 PM
  #3  
oliver bloom
4th Gear
Thread Starter
 
oliver bloom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks Toby. Exactly what I thought too. Only reason why this would be different would be a known numbering anomaly or different convention for early RHD cars, but that would not make any sense. Have seen earlier and later cars following the coding rules to the...number.
Old 02-10-2017, 03:26 PM
  #4  
John D.
Banned
 
John D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Somewhere....
Posts: 10,005
Received 55 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Toby is right on... I've been watching 930 prices lately to estimate "current market value" for insurance - and this was just on Bat - which is a 79 930 and has a terrific image in the listing of what the VIN should look like:
https://goo.gl/4GRoYJ

Hope this helps - and keep us posted on your search!

John D.
Old 02-11-2017, 12:00 AM
  #5  
oliver bloom
4th Gear
Thread Starter
 
oliver bloom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thank you John. I have checked w the local club and also put known and advertised cars under the microscope when it comes to vins, stickers etc and this car just does not add up. Life goes on!
Old 02-13-2017, 12:20 PM
  #6  
Benny771
Racer
 
Benny771's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Mines for sale...
1989...930
The following users liked this post:
RodneyLadd (Yesterday)


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: fishy?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:23 AM.