Notices
911 Turbo (930) Forum 1975-1989

Backdating '76 930 to original non-intercooled setup, what should I change?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-2014, 05:42 PM
  #1  
midnite993
Racer
Thread Starter
 
midnite993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 253
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default Backdating '76 930 to original non-intercooled setup, what should I change?

I have a German market '76 930 in Copper Bronze Metallic with plaid interior. It is mostly original with only 62,000km. It was upgraded about 8 years ago to GHL headers, K27 turbo, Garrettson long neck intercooler, and Tial wastegate.

Thank goodness the previous owner kept all of the original non-intercooler charge pipes and parts, and I have the early Turbo tail in the right color. I plan to keep the headers, K27, and Tial. I thought it would be fairly simple to just remove the intercooler and put the original parts back in, but nothing is ever that easy.

Questions:

1. Will the k27 and Tial wastegate work OK with the original charge pipe (non-intercooled) system?

2. The Garrettson intercooler has an overboost cutoff switch (that cuts off the fuel pumps), but there is no bung for it that I can see in the original system. Does the original system have a different way of overboost protection?

3. The blowoff valve was external with the Garrettson, but it is inside the aluminum housing in the original system. I don't understand how that one works...it doesn't appear to need any hoses connected to it to operate unlike the current external one. When I remove the external blowoff, do I just cap off the plumbing for it or does it somehow need to be re-routed?

Thanks for your help!
Old 06-16-2014, 09:47 PM
  #2  
mel_t_vin
Rennlist Member
 
mel_t_vin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, San Francisco, Tampa
Posts: 2,103
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by midnite993
1. Will the k27 and Tial wastegate work OK with the original charge pipe (non-intercooled) system?
Are you asking from a fit or function standpoint? From a function standpoint...probably. From a fit standpoint...no.

As the compressor inlet and outlet on the K27 are larger than those on the 3LDZ, the original charge pipes will not simply bolt up.


Originally Posted by midnite993
2. The Garrettson intercooler has an overboost cutoff switch (that cuts off the fuel pumps), but there is no bung for it that I can see in the original system. Does the original system have a different way of overboost protection?
The original system functions in a similar manner and has a boost pressure switch, 930.606.101.00, threaded into the compressor bypass valve assembly.


Originally Posted by midnite993
3. The blowoff valve was external with the Garrettson, but it is inside the aluminum housing in the original system. I don't understand how that one works...it doesn't appear to need any hoses connected to it to operate unlike the current external one. When I remove the external blowoff, do I just cap off the plumbing for it or does it somehow need to be re-routed?
BTW, that's not a blowoff valve [vent-to-atmosphere]...it's a compressor bypass valve [recirculation]. The OE CBV assembly has an internal, spring-loaded, piston that is displaced under manifold vacuum [sudden closed throttle]. It re-routes high pressure charged air, around the throttle butterfly, back to the intake tract to prevent the compressor/wheel from stalling.

Your current external CBV probably utilizes aftermarket rubber intake boots to make it work. In order to correctly back-date your system, you will need the original intake boots.

Note: Not sure at what pressure you plan to run your non-intercooled K27, but IIRC, and I'll defer to others here, the factory limited the '75-'77 cars to 0.6 bar.
Old 06-17-2014, 12:06 AM
  #3  
midnite993
Racer
Thread Starter
 
midnite993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 253
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

>As the compressor inlet and outlet on the K27 are larger than those on the 3LDZ, the original charge pipes will not simply bolt up.

The previous owner must have installed the K27 before upgrading to the intercooler, because the charge pipes had rubber or silicone connecting hoses that fit onto the K27 parts just fine. Will the K27 work OK with the reduced diameter pipes?

>The original system functions in a similar manner and has a boost pressure switch

Looking closely, my car had an adapter/splitter in that spot with a boost guage sending unit on it, and there is an empty bung for the overboost switch.

>Your current external CBV probably utilizes aftermarket rubber intake boots to make it work. In order to correctly back-date your system, you will need the original intake boots.

Thanks for the CBV explanation. Yes it did, and I found an identical intake boot without the bung for the external CBV so I'm reinstalling it.

>Note: Not sure at what pressure you plan to run your non-intercooled K27, but IIRC, and I'll defer to others here, the factory limited the '75-'77 cars to 0.6 bar.

The car tops out around .8 bar with the intercooler on. Do I need to replace the spring to lower the boost to .6?
Old 06-17-2014, 03:06 PM
  #4  
michaeljeller
Cruisin'
 
michaeljeller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: dayton, ohio, usa
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the early cars ran at .8 bar stock, the 3.3 cars ran at 1.0--i've got a 1.0 spring on my 75 930, it works just fine...
Old 06-17-2014, 06:26 PM
  #5  
midnite993
Racer
Thread Starter
 
midnite993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 253
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Just to be clear Michaeljeller, your 75 930 runs 1.0 bar OK without an intercooler? Or does your car have an intercooler added?
Old 06-18-2014, 11:29 AM
  #6  
michaeljeller
Cruisin'
 
michaeljeller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: dayton, ohio, usa
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

no intercooler--sc cam grind & performance exhaust is all--runs very well.
Old 06-18-2014, 02:19 PM
  #7  
midnite993
Racer
Thread Starter
 
midnite993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 253
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Super...thanks for the help!
Old 06-18-2014, 07:54 PM
  #8  
mel_t_vin
Rennlist Member
 
mel_t_vin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, San Francisco, Tampa
Posts: 2,103
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by midnite993
The previous owner must have installed the K27 before upgrading to the intercooler, because the charge pipes had rubber or silicone connecting hoses that fit onto the K27 parts just fine. Will the K27 work OK with the reduced diameter pipes?
That makes sense...in order to fit a K27, the OE charge pipes are usually replaced with aftermarket rubber/silicone boots. Will the K27 work "okay" with the reduced-diameter OE charge pipes? Well, that would be a subjective "yes". It will be less effective, and down on power, as the inducer will be restricted/choked.


Originally Posted by midnite993
Looking closely, my car had an adapter/splitter in that spot with a boost guage sending unit on it, and there is an empty bung for the overboost switch.
Nice detective work.


Originally Posted by midnite993
Thanks for the CBV explanation. Yes it did, and I found an identical intake boot without the bung for the external CBV so I'm reinstalling it.
Wise choice going back to the factory parts.


Originally Posted by midnite993
The car tops out around .8 bar with the intercooler on. Do I need to replace the spring to lower the boost to .6?
If I were you, I would downgrade the spring in your TiAL.

As far as I know, the factory used the same wastegate on both the 3.0L and 3.3L engines. What they changed was the turbocharger. And as you plan to keep running the K27, the simplest thing for you to do would be to install a weaker boost spring in your wastegate.
Old 06-18-2014, 08:02 PM
  #9  
mel_t_vin
Rennlist Member
 
mel_t_vin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, San Francisco, Tampa
Posts: 2,103
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by michaeljeller
the early cars ran at .8 bar stock, the 3.3 cars ran at 1.0--i've got a 1.0 spring on my 75 930, it works just fine...
Wrong...on both accounts.

3.0L non-intercooled cars came from the factory running 0.6 bar of boost and later 3.3L intercooled cars came from the factory running 0.8 bar of boost.

Midnite, I would proceed with caution here. If you hole a piston or put a rod through the case, are you able to rebuild the motor yourself? If not, I suppose, for a small fee, you could always have Mr. Jeller rebuild it for you.
Old 06-18-2014, 09:24 PM
  #10  
MUSSBERGER
uninformed gas bag
(contemplating on whether gas bag is one or two words)
Rennlist Member
 
MUSSBERGER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melbourne Beach
Posts: 20,514
Received 171 Likes on 125 Posts
Default

I have two settings on my EBC. One is .08 and the other is 1.0. I never go to the latter.
Old 06-19-2014, 01:27 PM
  #11  
michaeljeller
Cruisin'
 
michaeljeller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: dayton, ohio, usa
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mel_t_vin
Wrong...on both accounts.

3.0L non-intercooled cars came from the factory running 0.6 bar of boost and later 3.3L intercooled cars came from the factory running 0.8 bar of boost.

Midnite, I would proceed with caution here. If you hole a piston or put a rod through the case, are you able to rebuild the motor yourself? If not, I suppose, for a small fee, you could always have Mr. Jeller rebuild it for you.
i'll concede that we're both wrong--the 3.0 cars DO run stock boost at .8 bar--see the appropriate page at www.autozine.org--but you are correct that the 3.3 cars are also .8, but they upped compression from 6.5:1 to 7.0. i've been running at 1.0 bar in my car for 15 yrs, no problem!
Old 06-20-2014, 02:31 AM
  #12  
mel_t_vin
Rennlist Member
 
mel_t_vin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, San Francisco, Tampa
Posts: 2,103
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by michaeljeller
i'll concede that we're both wrong--the 3.0 cars DO run stock boost at .8 bar--see the appropriate page at ww.autozine.org but you are correct that the 3.3 cars are also .8, but they upped compression from 6.5:1 to 7.0. i've been running at 1.0 bar in my car for 15 yrs, no problem!
Not exactly sure what you're looking at on that web page...they don't list anything older than a '96 Boxster.

And no need to concede anything...3.0L non-intercooled cars did not leave the factory running at 0.8 bar.

Yes, the 3.0L motors were base-lined to run a 6.5 CR. Although, as Porsche did not blueprint these motors at the time, the CR of the early turbos actually varied anywhere from 6.4 to 7.2.
Old 06-20-2014, 02:52 AM
  #13  
mel_t_vin
Rennlist Member
 
mel_t_vin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, San Francisco, Tampa
Posts: 2,103
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by michaeljeller
i've got a 1.0 spring on my 75 930, it works just fine...
Out of curiosity, what device(s) are you using to measure charge pressure?

And whenever you get the chance, please post a passenger-eye video of a 0-130mph daytime WOT run in your car, showing boost pressure, final velocity, and elapsed time.
Old 06-20-2014, 11:14 AM
  #14  
michaeljeller
Cruisin'
 
michaeljeller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: dayton, ohio, usa
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i've got a vdo boost guage w/ telltale where the clock is supposed to be--try www.autozine.org/911/911_8.htm you should also read the appropriate section of "porsche 911 turbo--air cooled years 1975-1998" by andreas gabriel--then send him notice that his stats are wrong!

Last edited by michaeljeller; 06-20-2014 at 11:38 AM. Reason: add info



Quick Reply: Backdating '76 930 to original non-intercooled setup, what should I change?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:54 AM.