Notices
911 Forum 1964-1989
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Intercity Lines, LLC

3.2 performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-09-2017, 04:41 PM
  #1  
micjhall
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
micjhall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 3.2 performance

I know.
Beaten issue.
Have read many past threads but am not convinced on which plan to choose.
Flawless 1989 stock 3.2 engine with 78k miles but Needing more HP and torque.
Do I change the exhaust using the Fabspeed 911 carrera sport performance package (or equivalent) + SW chip or do a top end rebuild concentrating on heads and cams, or some combination.
Engine runs so well I hate to make many modifications.
Car is for street use with 1-2 track days.
Thanks
Old 01-09-2017, 05:12 PM
  #2  
rusnak
I haddah Google dat
Rennlist Member
 
rusnak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 11,501
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

You'll know from reading past threads that the logical place to start is with the driver, as in taking performance driving lessons.
Old 01-09-2017, 05:39 PM
  #3  
Bloose993TT
Three Wheelin'
 
Bloose993TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,688
Received 128 Likes on 92 Posts
Default

This ^. Also lighten the car up and work on dialing in the suspension/handling before you do any major engine mods. It gets real expensive to get noticeable HP gains on the 3.2 unless you can do the work yourself.

Here's a cool build thread to check out on PP.
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/canad...-part-2-a.html
Old 01-09-2017, 06:09 PM
  #4  
Trakrat
Advanced
 
Trakrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I always hate it when people respond with those 'improve the driver' response.

That's like saying asking "What steak should I buy for the best taste?" and someone responds with "improve your cooking skills first".


Seriously though... I've been looking into the same thing.
If your engine is running healthy and strong, then start with your suspension.
A better suspension will make the car feel lighter and improve handling and response. Go with a lighter clutch/flywheel setup as well for improved acceleration response

Obviously a 3.2 is not straight line rocket... and never will be. Though 0-60 in 5.9 for a 30 year old car isn't too bad.

Remove unnecessary weight can help too... heaters, AC, radio, racing seats, spare, etc...

For engine performance only, what you mentioned are usually the best places to start.
chip and straight racing exhaust will improve power. possibly adding better spark plugs, plug wires, cold air induction kit.
But alas... even with serious mods you might be able to add about 50-70 hp... but that's about it.
Don't expect turbo power with a 3.2.
Old 01-09-2017, 07:10 PM
  #5  
Amber Gramps
Addict
 
Amber Gramps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alta Loma Alone
Posts: 37,770
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Would you believe that my bone stock 3,2 engine can out accelerate and corner a couple of newer stock 911's? A local 964 and 993 while they may be close, they are no match.

It's all in the power to weight ratio, suspension set up, and in the driver's comfort level.

Look at my car's weight in my signature.

Last edited by Amber Gramps; 01-09-2017 at 07:51 PM.
Old 01-09-2017, 08:28 PM
  #6  
grgallo
Rennlist Member
 
grgallo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Montgomery county PA
Posts: 871
Received 157 Likes on 70 Posts
Default

Trakrat: improving cooking skills is a good thing
Micjhall: what do you want? a track car or a street car?
Amber Gramps: is correct, Porsche mostly pursued weight reduction to improve performance
Old 01-09-2017, 09:14 PM
  #7  
Amber Gramps
Addict
 
Amber Gramps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alta Loma Alone
Posts: 37,770
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by grgallo
Trakrat: improving cooking skills is a good thing
Micjhall: what do you want? a track car or a street car?
Amber Gramps: is correct, Porsche mostly pursued weight reduction to improve performance
Yep. My lightweight interior Trumps this bloated red bovine every times it's tried

...and when Dave from TRE spends a half hour drooling over my car and personally invites me to his Treffen at a C&C I know I'm doing something right.

Attached Images   
Old 01-09-2017, 09:35 PM
  #8  
Amber Gramps
Addict
 
Amber Gramps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alta Loma Alone
Posts: 37,770
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

The key is to eliminate everything that doesn't make the car go faster. The list of "Delete" items on the back end alone on my car is madness to the average Porsche owner. Most won't even know what's missing if they don't personally wrench on their own 3,2. Likely 65lbs missing from this picture alone.
Attached Images  
Old 01-09-2017, 11:10 PM
  #9  
rusnak
I haddah Google dat
Rennlist Member
 
rusnak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 11,501
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Trakrat
I always hate it when people respond with those 'improve the driver' response.

That's like saying asking "What steak should I buy for the best taste?" and someone responds with "improve your cooking skills first".


Seriously though... I've been looking into the same thing.
If your engine is running healthy and strong, then start with your suspension.
A better suspension will make the car feel lighter and improve handling and response. Go with a lighter clutch/flywheel setup as well for improved acceleration response

Obviously a 3.2 is not straight line rocket... and never will be. Though 0-60 in 5.9 for a 30 year old car isn't too bad.

Remove unnecessary weight can help too... heaters, AC, radio, racing seats, spare, etc...

For engine performance only, what you mentioned are usually the best places to start.
chip and straight racing exhaust will improve power. possibly adding better spark plugs, plug wires, cold air induction kit.
But alas... even with serious mods you might be able to add about 50-70 hp... but that's about it.
Don't expect turbo power with a 3.2.
The best response is to bolt in a completely different motor, like a 3.6 with Varioram, but I digress.

I didn't want to recommend any engine mods because the question is like asking what kind of stove should he buy to make a better steak, faster.
Old 01-10-2017, 12:24 AM
  #10  
Henley1
Pro
 
Henley1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: At my cottage.....
Posts: 628
Received 37 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

To answer the question. Yes I'd say a exhaust. N chip. N pull some weight while you in there. Itb set up might be a idea. I have the same problem where we go on drives that are rather "spirted ". My 3.2 dosent miss a beat. Literly 500 600 km of hard running. It runs so well i didnt want ri open it up but I wanted to do a few odds n ends. So I did the above to scratch the itch.
Old 01-10-2017, 08:53 AM
  #11  
stlrj
Instructor
 
stlrj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

The easiest most cost effective way I found to wake up my 87 Carrera was to replace the antiquated single hole injectors with the new style EV6 4 hole Bosch injectors similar to the four hole Bosch Design 3 injectors on the 996 engines. Now I understand why these modern water cooled 911s are so quick and responsive.

Another reason I prefer this solution is to keep it smog legal and invisible to inspecton.


Cheers,

Joe

Last edited by stlrj; 01-10-2017 at 06:08 PM.
The following users liked this post:
boulder74 (09-29-2020)
Old 01-10-2017, 09:50 AM
  #12  
porsche0nut
Race Car
 
porsche0nut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 3,526
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stlrj
The easiest most cost effective way I found to wake up my 87 Carrera was to replace the old fashioned single hole injectors with the new style EV6 4 hole Bosch injectors like the ones on the 996 engines. Now I understand why these modern water cooled 911s are so quick and responsive.

Another reason I prefer this solution is to keep it smog legal and invisible.

Cheers,

Joe
Interesting, I've never even thought of replacing the injectors! Thanks!

As far as basic engine mods, I did exhaust (RarlyL8 headers/muffler) and SW chip. Noticeable performance improvement. To save some pennies just do a cat delete/bypass pipe and SW chip. Can't beat that improvement for $500.

Pulling out weight is fun, and beneficial, but not if it compromises the car for you. That's up to you to decide.
Old 01-10-2017, 10:21 AM
  #13  
stlrj
Instructor
 
stlrj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

See how the new style injector spray patterns have changed:

Old 01-10-2017, 10:53 AM
  #14  
Spyerx
Rennlist Member
 
Spyerx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 16,485
Received 1,730 Likes on 1,058 Posts
Default

What's your budget?
Removing weight is "cheap"
Adding power is expensive.
An exhaust frees up these motors quite a bit. Maybe a chip helps.
After that it's $$$$$. That many places too
Old 01-10-2017, 01:04 PM
  #15  
T&T Racing
Rennlist Member
 
T&T Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: New York & Indiana
Posts: 2,871
Received 336 Likes on 270 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rusnak
You'll know from reading past threads that the logical place to start is with the driver, as in taking performance driving lessons.
Engage a procoach to provide coaching, let him drive the car, compare your lap times with the coach's lap times. If the delta is small, consider upgrades; otherwise, invest more $$$ in procoaching until the delta is small.


Quick Reply: 3.2 performance



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:38 PM.