Notices
911 Forum 1964-1989
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Intercity Lines, LLC

Classic 911 as a daily driver?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-24-2013, 01:35 AM
  #1  
Ccporsche
5th Gear
Thread Starter
 
Ccporsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Paradise Valley, AZ
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Classic 911 as a daily driver?

Hi everyone,

I'm a huge fan of classic 911s but have never owned one nor have I had much experience driving them.
My question is what would it be like to have a classic 911 (1965-73) as a daily driver? What would the maintenance costs look like? Etc.
Old 01-24-2013, 01:56 AM
  #2  
TT Oversteer
Racer
 
TT Oversteer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sierra Foothills, CA
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Depends where you live. In moderate climates an early 911 is an excellent daily driver. Aircooled 911's are durable, fairly economical on gas, and FUN!! These cars were never designed for air conditioning so they can be a little uncomfortable in hot climates. Overall maintenance costs are not too expensive, particularly if you can do some of the work yourself. Parts and repair costs on the other hand.... Also worth considering if you spend a lot of time commuting: airbags, ABS, seatbelt pre-tensioners, crumple zones, etc can save your life. You are giving up many layers of crash protection when driving a forty year old car every day.
Old 01-24-2013, 10:11 AM
  #3  
VintageRacer
Rennlist Member
 
VintageRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 17 year member, North Georgia
Posts: 1,262
Received 421 Likes on 215 Posts
Default

^^ What he said.

The early cars are not theft-protected like modern cars. It's not hard to drive one off.
Old 01-24-2013, 10:27 AM
  #4  
ivangene
Parts Specialist
Rennlist Member
 
ivangene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 16,326
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

yes you can daily drive one...

but have a back up car - those years might be temperamental with carbs and all plus the basic fact its 40 years old, stuff goes wrong...if its a car that has sat a long time, it will start leaking and wearing out....if its been driven a lot, its already worn out and leaking

it will require work, maybe not a lot, but some - and the work can take time which means you need a back up plan

IMO

welcome and good luck
Old 01-24-2013, 12:29 PM
  #5  
DTMLGND
Rennlist Member
 
DTMLGND's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: CA
Posts: 306
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Sure! I daily drove mine for 3 years, shuttled 3 kids to/from school and then foolishly sold it for a car with a larger backseat(1989 BMW E30 M3). Both dynamite and iconic cars, but obviously different drives altogether.
I know, should've got a beater for a DD and kept the 72T!!
Ughh!
Now I'm looking at 964 C2 coupes, G50 Carreras and SC's now that my kids are all driving their own cars.
Old 01-24-2013, 01:53 PM
  #6  
race911
Rennlist Member
 
race911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 12,311
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

While the longhoods still certainly function as cars you can use daily (even with AC, if you require and want to go to the expense), I think the ship has sailed with them as far as how much value you're putting at risk.

Then you've got the safety factor mentioned above, depending on the specifics of your commute pattern.

That said, it was nice to see a nice 356C coupe out and about during the week around town recently. Likely a pleasure drive, though.
Old 01-24-2013, 01:56 PM
  #7  
Ccporsche
5th Gear
Thread Starter
 
Ccporsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Paradise Valley, AZ
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for all the responses!

Safety is a concern, but I don't do very much freeway driving and I don't drive long distances too often. One of my other concerns is Arizona summers. I've been concerned about the reliability and effectiveness of the A/C in these cars in AZ extreme heat.

So I've decided to consider later models. I'm taking a look at a beautiful 74 911 with 1980 3.0 engine transplant. Not sure how I feel about it not having the original engine. What do you guys think?
Old 01-24-2013, 02:00 PM
  #8  
race911
Rennlist Member
 
race911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 12,311
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ccporsche
Thanks for all the responses!

Safety is a concern, but I don't do very much freeway driving and I don't drive long distances too often. One of my other concerns is Arizona summers. I've been concerned about the reliability and effectiveness of the A/C in these cars in AZ extreme heat.

So I've decided to consider later models. I'm taking a look at a beautiful 74 911 with 1980 3.0 engine transplant. Not sure how I feel about it not having the original engine. What do you guys think?
A '74 isn't exactly a later model. Now if you were comparing to an '87-9 G50, maybe.

Think you need to educate yourself on the 2.7L engines that were originally installed with them.....

No way, no how, in 2013 are you enjoying an air cooled 911 in the AZ summer. In the '80s, life was simpler, so we dealt with it.
Old 01-24-2013, 09:38 PM
  #9  
Ed Hughes
Rennlist Member
 
Ed Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 16,507
Received 77 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

A '74 with a transplanted engine is not a high-value car, and you will have a limited market should you sell.

Personally, I'd not want to drive an older 911 as a DD. Not to say you can't run errands during the week, but I like having a DD that is more "civil"- it makes me appreciate the drives in the Porsche even more. A 911 doesn't make such a good car for shopping trips at Costco, either.
Old 01-24-2013, 10:07 PM
  #10  
rusnak
I haddah Google dat
Rennlist Member
 
rusnak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 11,501
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

When I was in my late 20s, I drove the 914-6 with dual carbs for about 2 years.

It was not nearly as comfortable as the 911SC or the 3.2 911 that I eventually bought to drive as a DD. But other than periods when I have to drive the work truck, I drive an aircooled 911 daily and have now for about 20 years. I probably have put a half million miles on aircooled 911s...
Old 01-24-2013, 10:30 PM
  #11  
VintageRacer
Rennlist Member
 
VintageRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 17 year member, North Georgia
Posts: 1,262
Received 421 Likes on 215 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ccporsche
So I've decided to consider later models. I'm taking a look at a beautiful 74 911 with 1980 3.0 engine transplant. Not sure how I feel about it not having the original engine. What do you guys think?
No. The rubber bumper 1974 is not worth the change.

Have you ever installed a 1980 3.0 into a 1974 911? It is not as simple as it seems.

I promise.
Old 01-25-2013, 12:05 AM
  #12  
race911
Rennlist Member
 
race911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 12,311
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VintageRacer
No. The rubber bumper 1974 is not worth the change.

Have you ever installed a 1980 3.0 into a 1974 911? It is not as simple as it seems.

I promise.
In most basic terms, it's minor wiring on the engine harness + the 6 pin ignition box, and an oil line (purposely not mentioning installation of an oil cooler since the 2.7s need them anyway). Hell, you could just run the 2.7's wiring harness, ignition, and CIS systems if you really wanted to.

Sure, optimizing the installation means making the slightly incompatible CIS systems mate, and welding an O2 bung on the better OE '74 exhaust + using the chassis' existing oil lines.

I've only done about 15 3.0/3.2 into earlier cars, what have I forgotten since the mid '90s?
Old 01-25-2013, 01:54 AM
  #13  
VintageRacer
Rennlist Member
 
VintageRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 17 year member, North Georgia
Posts: 1,262
Received 421 Likes on 215 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by race911
In most basic terms, it's minor wiring on the engine harness + the 6 pin ignition box, and an oil line (purposely not mentioning installation of an oil cooler since the 2.7s need them anyway). Hell, you could just run the 2.7's wiring harness, ignition, and CIS systems if you really wanted to.

Sure, optimizing the installation means making the slightly incompatible CIS systems mate, and welding an O2 bung on the better OE '74 exhaust + using the chassis' existing oil lines.
This seems simple to me.
Old 01-25-2013, 08:08 AM
  #14  
MrBonus
Three Wheelin'
 
MrBonus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,796
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

There are two main things that prevent me from making a daily driver out of my '89 - the anemic air conditioning (which currently needs a recharge) and our salt-covered winter roads.
Old 01-25-2013, 09:26 AM
  #15  
Steam Driver
Racer
 
Steam Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Hixson, TN
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Back in the '70's I had first a 356C, then a 914-4, and finally a 914-6 as daily drivers, the latter up into the '80's. No problems doing that with any of them. Granted it's 40 years later, but the cars can be as reliable now as they were then. I never had ANY unscheduled or non-routine maintenance issues with the -6 until after I made it a weekend toy only; then stuff began. The cars don't like inactivity.

Recurring things I keep hearing in these threads are safety and creature comforts. I've never considered the former (when a salesman starts talking airbags and the like to me I switch him off) and regarding the comfort issues the cars haven't changed, we have! (Thinking of the "P-word.")


Quick Reply: Classic 911 as a daily driver?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:39 AM.