New to me 1971 911T
#16
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
#17
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
^ certainly, as you know I charge a high market adjustment ha
#18
Official Wednesday AM Red Bull F1 test driver
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Nice looking coupe! Slowly reassembling a '72 T targa I bought from a friend recently- he'd lost interest in the restoration after the paintwork etc and I've always wanted a longhood. Luckily always an AZ car so no rust and very solid.
Something about the "older" cars! Hopefully have it running later this winter...
Something about the "older" cars! Hopefully have it running later this winter...
#20
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Had pirelli cn36 installed today. Sweet. Look right. Drive period.
#22
#23
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
WBYonder
whats width of ur rear wheel and u don’t have fender run with 215/60?
whats width of ur rear wheel and u don’t have fender run with 215/60?
#24
#25
Drifting
^ my plan was to run 7R's on the rear of my '72 - I thought they were a straight fit though. Glad you shared this - I may need to work with Harvey on custom offset.
#26
Rennlist Member
Great looking car. Keep us updated with the changes and mods you do.
I have never driven a 2.7 but it sounds like you have been happy with the power/torque/speed of it. I need to get my hands on a long hood.
I have never driven a 2.7 but it sounds like you have been happy with the power/torque/speed of it. I need to get my hands on a long hood.
#27
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
#28
I also went out and measured and they are 6mm spacers.
#29
Drifting
Originally Posted by WBYonder
I too thought that they were a straight fit, with spacers. From what I read, I got some 15 mm spacers to use, but when my shop went to use them, they found a narrower spacer needed. They also found one of the spring plate bolts was too close to the wheel, so they ground it down a slight bit for clearance. I think this may be because I am using sway-away adjustable plates, not stock, so they may be a little thicker than the stock spring plates.
I also went out and measured and they are 6mm spacers.
I also went out and measured and they are 6mm spacers.
#30
When using 7" rear there is a bit of leeway
On my '72 back in the day before I added RS flares, I used 7ET23.3(usually a front) w/ 215/60 x15 tires, w/ stock suspension and alignment they rubbed a coulle of inches up above the lip on full compression. The usual solution would be to use a shorter tire, and/or add more neg camber or use a stiffer suspension. The factory went to the 7R w/ ET49 but other wise the same tube type rim as the then current 7ET23.3. W/o a spacer the backspace is maxed out(~6") and the tire hits the suspension bolts on the inside. Factory use 6.5 to 16mm spacers to solve that problem, the spacer used depended on the tire
Here's a comparison of using a 7ET23.3 rear w/ a 7ET49 w/ 7mm spacer for ET42
On my '72 back in the day before I added RS flares, I used 7ET23.3(usually a front) w/ 215/60 x15 tires, w/ stock suspension and alignment they rubbed a coulle of inches up above the lip on full compression. The usual solution would be to use a shorter tire, and/or add more neg camber or use a stiffer suspension. The factory went to the 7R w/ ET49 but other wise the same tube type rim as the then current 7ET23.3. W/o a spacer the backspace is maxed out(~6") and the tire hits the suspension bolts on the inside. Factory use 6.5 to 16mm spacers to solve that problem, the spacer used depended on the tire
Here's a comparison of using a 7ET23.3 rear w/ a 7ET49 w/ 7mm spacer for ET42
The following users liked this post:
Cyberbug (12-22-2022)