718 GTS 4.0
The following 6 users liked this post by limegreen:
BlueBob (01-18-2020),
erik_plus8 (01-17-2020),
JIMMY JAMES (01-17-2020),
k3|th (01-18-2020),
Noah Fect (01-17-2020),
and 1 others liked this post.
#138
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
#139
Pro
By official Porsche numbers, the manual 718 GTS 4.0 is 0.1 seconds quicker to 100 km/h than the manual 718 GTS 2.5T. The 2.5T motor takes time to spool up the turbos and hit the rated torque, and it's weaker than the 4.0T before it spools up. In first gear, the 4.0 could already exceed 4500 RPM by the time the turbos spool up on the 2.5T. Now, if you're cruising at 2K RPM in third gear, floor it, and wait for the turbos to spool up, the 2.5T might be slightly better. I've driven 718s and was never particularly impressed by usefulness of low end torque due to the turbo lag.
2000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 210 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 255 ft/lb, so not a lot in it!
3000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 330 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 265 ft/lb,
4000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 350 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 280 ft/lb,
5000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 350 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 310 ft/lb,
6000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 325 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 310 ft/lb,
7000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 280 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 300 ft/lb,
7500 RPM - 2.5t GTS 270 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 288 ft/lb,
So the 4l will feel slow below 5000 RPM unlike the turbo car, but they will feel very similar above 5000RPM.
If you take off slow from 0, the 4.0 might be a little faster to 40mph.
However, both cars will launch from at least 3000-5000 RPM and the 4.0 GTS will be a detuned 4.0 so my bet is the 2.5t GTS might be slightly quicker due to the torque advantage but there wont be much in it and they will feel very similar in terms of pace.
I think 2.5t GTS will perform a little better on slower winding alpine roads with the extra low RPM torque and due to the relatively long manual gears. PDK with the extra gear should help reduce the torque advantage of the 2.5t GTS. Maybe the 4.0 GTS will be a little faster on the track due to the high RPM hp advantage but overall they should still be similar on the track regardless of gearing.
Of course if you go Stage 1 tune on the 2.5t you will need you GT3 to keep up. Otherwise in PDK form I don't think there is real any disadvantage to the 4.0 or the 2.5t for that matter unless you have a sound preference.
#140
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,534
Received 834 Likes
on
458 Posts
The turbo lag in modern turbo cars is not really like the old days:
2000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 210 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 255 ft/lb, so not a lot in it!
3000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 330 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 265 ft/lb,
4000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 350 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 280 ft/lb,
5000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 350 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 310 ft/lb,
6000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 325 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 310 ft/lb,
7000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 280 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 300 ft/lb,
7500 RPM - 2.5t GTS 270 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 288 ft/lb,
So the 4l will feel slow below 5000 RPM unlike the turbo car, but they will feel very similar above 5000RPM.
If you take off slow from 0, the 4.0 might be a little faster to 40mph.
However, both cars will launch from at least 3000-5000 RPM and the 4.0 GTS will be a detuned 4.0 so my bet is the 2.5t GTS might be slightly quicker due to the torque advantage but there wont be much in it and they will feel very similar in terms of pace.
I think 2.5t GTS will perform a little better on slower winding alpine roads with the extra low RPM torque and due to the relatively long manual gears. PDK with the extra gear should help reduce the torque advantage of the 2.5t GTS. Maybe the 4.0 GTS will be a little faster on the track due to the high RPM hp advantage but overall they should still be similar on the track regardless of gearing.
Of course if you go Stage 1 tune on the 2.5t you will need you GT3 to keep up. Otherwise in PDK form I don't think there is real any disadvantage to the 4.0 or the 2.5t for that matter unless you have a sound preference.
2000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 210 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 255 ft/lb, so not a lot in it!
3000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 330 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 265 ft/lb,
4000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 350 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 280 ft/lb,
5000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 350 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 310 ft/lb,
6000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 325 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 310 ft/lb,
7000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 280 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 300 ft/lb,
7500 RPM - 2.5t GTS 270 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 288 ft/lb,
So the 4l will feel slow below 5000 RPM unlike the turbo car, but they will feel very similar above 5000RPM.
If you take off slow from 0, the 4.0 might be a little faster to 40mph.
However, both cars will launch from at least 3000-5000 RPM and the 4.0 GTS will be a detuned 4.0 so my bet is the 2.5t GTS might be slightly quicker due to the torque advantage but there wont be much in it and they will feel very similar in terms of pace.
I think 2.5t GTS will perform a little better on slower winding alpine roads with the extra low RPM torque and due to the relatively long manual gears. PDK with the extra gear should help reduce the torque advantage of the 2.5t GTS. Maybe the 4.0 GTS will be a little faster on the track due to the high RPM hp advantage but overall they should still be similar on the track regardless of gearing.
Of course if you go Stage 1 tune on the 2.5t you will need you GT3 to keep up. Otherwise in PDK form I don't think there is real any disadvantage to the 4.0 or the 2.5t for that matter unless you have a sound preference.
lb ft.
On back roads, you’d just stay in first and second gears, where the 4.0 can accelerate into the power band as quick as the turbos can spool up. The 718’s flat four engines are among the laggiest turbo engines I’ve experienced (base particularly, 2.5T less so), much less responsive than bigger displacement motors like the BMW B58 or Mercedes-Benz M157.
#141
Pro
The torque numbers you have for the 2.5T seem off. The peak torque should be 317 lb ft on PDK, 310 lb ft on manual. Neither can produce 350
lb ft.
On back roads, you’d just stay in first and second gears, where the 4.0 can accelerate into the power band as quick as the turbos can spool up. The 718’s flat four engines are among the laggiest turbo engines I’ve experienced (base particularly, 2.5T less so), much less responsive than bigger displacement motors like the BMW B58 or Mercedes-Benz M157.
lb ft.
On back roads, you’d just stay in first and second gears, where the 4.0 can accelerate into the power band as quick as the turbos can spool up. The 718’s flat four engines are among the laggiest turbo engines I’ve experienced (base particularly, 2.5T less so), much less responsive than bigger displacement motors like the BMW B58 or Mercedes-Benz M157.
Regardless the 2.5 T pulls harder from 2500 RPM all the way up to 6000 RPM, the 4.0 pulls from about 4500 RPM but if you are running in Sport+ both cars will be running above 4500 RPM so not a lot of difference in performance unless you drop the revs in the 4.0.
The 2.5 turbo cars also have pre-spool and VTG so there are no spooling issues or lag above 3000 RPM. It is not like the old days. The new turbo cars actually feel fairly linear from 2500 RPM like an NA car. Modern 2l turbo cars like Audi, BMW and Merc actually pull from around 1500 RPM so really no lag these days.
And 718 GT4 - note in NM, not ft/lb:
#142
Burning Brakes
You can't discuss lag and use steady state torque curves as evidence, that's not how lag works.
#143
Rennlist Member
I'm in no rush to get anywhere on my backroads so NA and manual perform best regardless of torque, HP, or 0.1s acceleration diffs.
The following 3 users liked this post by hf1:
#145
#146
#147
By official Porsche numbers, the manual 718 GTS 4.0 is 0.1 seconds quicker to 100 km/h than the manual 718 GTS 2.5T. The 2.5T motor takes time to spool up the turbos and hit the rated torque, and it's weaker than the 4.0T before it spools up. In first gear, the 4.0 could already exceed 4500 RPM by the time the turbos spool up on the 2.5T. Now, if you're cruising at 2K RPM in third gear, floor it, and wait for the turbos to spool up, the 2.5T might be slightly better. I've driven 718s and was never particularly impressed by usefulness of low end torque due to the turbo lag.
#148
The following 3 users liked this post by Chester7:
#149
Both are fast...and now you have the option of either low end torquey turbo or high end power, it's win win. I doubt there is much between them and both will be fun enough for the drivers to enjoy.
The following 3 users liked this post by #1SomeGuy:
#150
Burning Brakes