Notices
718 GTS 4.0/GT4/GT4RS/Spyder/25th Anniversary Discussions about the 718 version of the GT4RS, GTS 4.0, GT4, Spyder and 25th Anniversary Boxster
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By: Cobb

718 GTS 4.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-17-2020, 12:14 AM
  #136  
limegreen
Pro
 
limegreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 661
Received 140 Likes on 74 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by donR


The following 6 users liked this post by limegreen:
BlueBob (01-18-2020), erik_plus8 (01-17-2020), JIMMY JAMES (01-17-2020), k3|th (01-18-2020), Noah Fect (01-17-2020), sonicworld (01-18-2020) and 1 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 01-17-2020, 01:07 AM
  #137  
Pokerhobo
Burning Brakes
 
Pokerhobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,160
Received 675 Likes on 351 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 95spiderman
gts needs pdk while gt4 should be stick. that would help differentiate them. i would love a boxster gts over a c8 but too much trouble to get boxster approved for hpde. c8 is targa so best of both worlds. still a gorgeous car in that green
A PDK GTS 4.0 will certainly be faster than a Manual GT4.
Old 01-17-2020, 01:20 AM
  #138  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 18,230
Received 5,154 Likes on 2,905 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pokerhobo
A PDK GTS 4.0 will certainly be faster than a Manual GT4.
Maybe in a short drag race - not on a track.
Old 01-17-2020, 01:27 AM
  #139  
donR
Pro
 
donR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 559
Received 202 Likes on 120 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wizee
By official Porsche numbers, the manual 718 GTS 4.0 is 0.1 seconds quicker to 100 km/h than the manual 718 GTS 2.5T. The 2.5T motor takes time to spool up the turbos and hit the rated torque, and it's weaker than the 4.0T before it spools up. In first gear, the 4.0 could already exceed 4500 RPM by the time the turbos spool up on the 2.5T. Now, if you're cruising at 2K RPM in third gear, floor it, and wait for the turbos to spool up, the 2.5T might be slightly better. I've driven 718s and was never particularly impressed by usefulness of low end torque due to the turbo lag.
The turbo lag in modern turbo cars is not really like the old days:

2000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 210 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 255 ft/lb, so not a lot in it!
3000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 330 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 265 ft/lb,
4000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 350 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 280 ft/lb,
5000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 350 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 310 ft/lb,
6000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 325 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 310 ft/lb,
7000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 280 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 300 ft/lb,
7500 RPM - 2.5t GTS 270 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 288 ft/lb,

So the 4l will feel slow below 5000 RPM unlike the turbo car, but they will feel very similar above 5000RPM.

If you take off slow from 0, the 4.0 might be a little faster to 40mph.

However, both cars will launch from at least 3000-5000 RPM and the 4.0 GTS will be a detuned 4.0 so my bet is the 2.5t GTS might be slightly quicker due to the torque advantage but there wont be much in it and they will feel very similar in terms of pace.

I think 2.5t GTS will perform a little better on slower winding alpine roads with the extra low RPM torque and due to the relatively long manual gears. PDK with the extra gear should help reduce the torque advantage of the 2.5t GTS. Maybe the 4.0 GTS will be a little faster on the track due to the high RPM hp advantage but overall they should still be similar on the track regardless of gearing.

Of course if you go Stage 1 tune on the 2.5t you will need you GT3 to keep up. Otherwise in PDK form I don't think there is real any disadvantage to the 4.0 or the 2.5t for that matter unless you have a sound preference.
The following 2 users liked this post by donR:
matmanx1 (01-17-2020), Semitone (04-14-2020)
Old 01-17-2020, 03:15 AM
  #140  
wizee
Rennlist Member
 
wizee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,534
Received 834 Likes on 458 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by donR
The turbo lag in modern turbo cars is not really like the old days:

2000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 210 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 255 ft/lb, so not a lot in it!
3000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 330 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 265 ft/lb,
4000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 350 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 280 ft/lb,
5000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 350 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 310 ft/lb,
6000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 325 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 310 ft/lb,
7000 RPM - 2.5t GTS 280 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 300 ft/lb,
7500 RPM - 2.5t GTS 270 ft/lb vs 718 GT4 288 ft/lb,

So the 4l will feel slow below 5000 RPM unlike the turbo car, but they will feel very similar above 5000RPM.

If you take off slow from 0, the 4.0 might be a little faster to 40mph.

However, both cars will launch from at least 3000-5000 RPM and the 4.0 GTS will be a detuned 4.0 so my bet is the 2.5t GTS might be slightly quicker due to the torque advantage but there wont be much in it and they will feel very similar in terms of pace.

I think 2.5t GTS will perform a little better on slower winding alpine roads with the extra low RPM torque and due to the relatively long manual gears. PDK with the extra gear should help reduce the torque advantage of the 2.5t GTS. Maybe the 4.0 GTS will be a little faster on the track due to the high RPM hp advantage but overall they should still be similar on the track regardless of gearing.

Of course if you go Stage 1 tune on the 2.5t you will need you GT3 to keep up. Otherwise in PDK form I don't think there is real any disadvantage to the 4.0 or the 2.5t for that matter unless you have a sound preference.
The torque numbers you have for the 2.5T seem off. The peak torque should be 317 lb ft on PDK, 310 lb ft on manual. Neither can produce 350
lb ft.

On back roads, you’d just stay in first and second gears, where the 4.0 can accelerate into the power band as quick as the turbos can spool up. The 718’s flat four engines are among the laggiest turbo engines I’ve experienced (base particularly, 2.5T less so), much less responsive than bigger displacement motors like the BMW B58 or Mercedes-Benz M157.
Old 01-17-2020, 03:44 AM
  #141  
donR
Pro
 
donR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 559
Received 202 Likes on 120 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wizee
The torque numbers you have for the 2.5T seem off. The peak torque should be 317 lb ft on PDK, 310 lb ft on manual. Neither can produce 350
lb ft.

On back roads, you’d just stay in first and second gears, where the 4.0 can accelerate into the power band as quick as the turbos can spool up. The 718’s flat four engines are among the laggiest turbo engines I’ve experienced (base particularly, 2.5T less so), much less responsive than bigger displacement motors like the BMW B58 or Mercedes-Benz M157.
Torque numbers are from APRs dyno chart so maybe it reads a little high but as you know Porsche is conservative with its numbers.

Regardless the 2.5 T pulls harder from 2500 RPM all the way up to 6000 RPM, the 4.0 pulls from about 4500 RPM but if you are running in Sport+ both cars will be running above 4500 RPM so not a lot of difference in performance unless you drop the revs in the 4.0.

The 2.5 turbo cars also have pre-spool and VTG so there are no spooling issues or lag above 3000 RPM. It is not like the old days. The new turbo cars actually feel fairly linear from 2500 RPM like an NA car. Modern 2l turbo cars like Audi, BMW and Merc actually pull from around 1500 RPM so really no lag these days.



And 718 GT4 - note in NM, not ft/lb:

Old 01-17-2020, 03:58 AM
  #142  
erik_plus8
Burning Brakes
 
erik_plus8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Europe
Posts: 784
Received 61 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

You can't discuss lag and use steady state torque curves as evidence, that's not how lag works.
The following 2 users liked this post by erik_plus8:
Gripster (01-17-2020), worf928 (01-17-2020)
Old 01-17-2020, 04:24 AM
  #143  
hf1
Rennlist Member
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,393
Likes: 0
Received 1,640 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

I'm in no rush to get anywhere on my backroads so NA and manual perform best regardless of torque, HP, or 0.1s acceleration diffs.

The following 3 users liked this post by hf1:
Chester7 (01-17-2020), MidEngineRules (01-17-2020), Mr La (02-03-2020)
Old 01-17-2020, 07:46 AM
  #144  
ldamelio
Rennlist Member
 
ldamelio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Bucks County PA
Posts: 1,555
Received 1,044 Likes on 573 Posts
Default

I wonder what production numbers will be. If the 718 is the 914 of the new millenium, the GTS 4.0 may turn out to be the 914-6 (ie, low volume).
Old 01-17-2020, 08:03 AM
  #145  
Ksdaoski
Rennlist Member
 
Ksdaoski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 3,397
Received 1,903 Likes on 942 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ldamelio
I wonder what production numbers will be. If the 718 is the 914 of the new millenium, the GTS 4.0 may turn out to be the 914-6 (ie, low volume).
914-6 has a race history, backed by Porsche factory, which makes a comparison to any 718, unrealistic.
Old 01-17-2020, 08:42 AM
  #146  
blackholescion
Pro
 
blackholescion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: NC
Posts: 574
Received 198 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG
Except that would result in 7 different reverse gears and one forward

There is no previous 718 7spd Manual...
I hear CVTs are pretty popular for emissions reasons.
Old 01-17-2020, 08:46 AM
  #147  
Chester7
Racer
 
Chester7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 444
Received 166 Likes on 102 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wizee
By official Porsche numbers, the manual 718 GTS 4.0 is 0.1 seconds quicker to 100 km/h than the manual 718 GTS 2.5T. The 2.5T motor takes time to spool up the turbos and hit the rated torque, and it's weaker than the 4.0T before it spools up. In first gear, the 4.0 could already exceed 4500 RPM by the time the turbos spool up on the 2.5T. Now, if you're cruising at 2K RPM in third gear, floor it, and wait for the turbos to spool up, the 2.5T might be slightly better. I've driven 718s and was never particularly impressed by usefulness of low end torque due to the turbo lag.
Sounds reasonable Wizee. For reference, how many turbo cars have you owned or do you still own?
Old 01-17-2020, 08:53 AM
  #148  
Chester7
Racer
 
Chester7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 444
Received 166 Likes on 102 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by erik_plus8
You can't discuss lag and use steady state torque curves as evidence, that's not how lag works.
I see both sides of this. But honestly, we're not going to solve this on a forum. And does it matter? Its starting to sound like two political parties debating. I have a 2019 GTS F4, and I like the idea of the GTS 4.0. IMO you won't see many of them on the road. Lots of people are excited, but many fewer are running to the dealer and putting money down. Like any other product, a high price leaves many folks on the sidelines.
The following 3 users liked this post by Chester7:
Fnumber1user (01-18-2020), k.alexander (01-17-2020), Semitone (04-14-2020)
Old 01-17-2020, 09:37 AM
  #149  
#1SomeGuy
Burning Brakes
 
#1SomeGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 1,063
Received 559 Likes on 333 Posts
Default

Both are fast...and now you have the option of either low end torquey turbo or high end power, it's win win. I doubt there is much between them and both will be fun enough for the drivers to enjoy.
The following 3 users liked this post by #1SomeGuy:
k.alexander (01-17-2020), matmanx1 (01-17-2020), Semitone (04-14-2020)
Old 01-17-2020, 10:01 AM
  #150  
MidEngineRules
Burning Brakes
 
MidEngineRules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 1,208
Received 257 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by #1SomeGuy
Both are fast...and now you have the option of either low end torquey turbo or high end power, it's win win. I doubt there is much between them and both will be fun enough for the drivers to enjoy.
No, you must take a side lol


Quick Reply: 718 GTS 4.0



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:57 PM.