Notices
Porsche Supercars Carrera GT, 918,960
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

A simple question about the so-called "bubble"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-15-2015, 08:02 PM
  #46  
golfnutintib
Rennlist Member
 
golfnutintib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: ..............
Posts: 3,859
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Definitely agree how we see and use/not use fancy sports cars is very much a function of phase of life.

I would only add that this year I took my 19 year old oldest son out with me to learn tracking for the first time. By summer we had done 3 track days. He drove his Jetta on the first day, then my M3 then my 997 CS. I coached him the second and third days. He has talent!! Now THAT was a fun time!
Old 11-15-2015, 10:39 PM
  #47  
rickyn f355
Instructor
 
rickyn f355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by golfnutintib
I would only add that this year I took my 19 year old oldest son out with me to learn tracking for the first time. By summer we had done 3 track days. He drove his Jetta on the first day, then my M3 then my 997 CS. I coached him the second and third days. He has talent!! Now THAT was a fun time!
and that right there makes every cent spent well worth it - I hope I can share that experience with my kids one day - these cars will be really old then! lol
Old 11-16-2015, 04:34 PM
  #48  
E-Man
Burning Brakes
 
E-Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 849
Received 317 Likes on 130 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by richk
Also don't see the point in owning 4.0, CGT, and GT2RS if your not going to drive them...but thats just me.
What he said ^^

I can think of only two reasons not to put miles on cars like these.
1) Bragging rights. "I own this car and it only has xx miles on it"
2) The long term objective is to one day sell it for as much money as possible, or pass it on to heirs while maintaining as much value as possible. Either way the car is held as a financial investment.

I don't see how either of these is consistent with being a car enthusiast. Cars are built with a primary purpose to be driven.

Different owners obviously own cars for different reasons. If an owner truly enjoys just looking at a car then more power to them. For each their own. My love for cars started when I was in grade school. Back then I never dreamed of owning super cars so I could look at them in my garage. The same holds true today. Oh and once again, if rates go up, no I am not selling.
Old 11-17-2015, 09:32 AM
  #49  
tmario
Rennlist Member
 
tmario's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Long island, NY
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The F40, as an example that someone brought up, is my all time favorite looking car but, the problem with the "oldies" in my experience, is that there's always something wrong with them. Unless I am able to have a full time mechanic going through them all the time, then it's probably better just to look at them. Personally, I like driving them and given that I have limited space, time and money, choices must be made.

One problem I see with (mentally) moving them into the investment space is that to be an effective investor, one must be dispassionate - which is exactly opposite to how I feel about cars.
Old 11-17-2015, 10:20 AM
  #50  
nuvolari612
Drifting
 
nuvolari612's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: midwest
Posts: 2,275
Received 127 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tmario
The F40, as an example that someone brought up, is my all time favorite looking car but, the problem with the "oldies" in my experience, is that there's always something wrong with them. Unless I am able to have a full time mechanic going through them all the time, then it's probably better just to look at them. Personally, I like driving them and given that I have limited space, time and money, choices must be made.

One problem I see with (mentally) moving them into the investment space is that to be an effective investor, one must be dispassionate - which is exactly opposite to how I feel about cars.
That's true when they sit and rot from the inside out.

Driven maintained they will perform as the factory intended.

These older cars have known issues which skilled mechanics are more than aware of it's simply a matter of the owners willingness to service their exotics.

Anyway CGT owners pulling the engine and doing preventative maintenance now that their values are up vs down. There is no way a CGT with delivery miles is mechanically a better car than one with miles properly maintained.

It's funny - take the old GTO's that have been wrecked raced you name it and they call it provenance but take a CGT with 30k miles beautifully maintained and its a beater personally think everyone who let's these cars sit admiring their odometer is missing out but to each their own as you said the passion just isn't there. These cars are the cheapest mistress one will ever have and why one places a hot mistress in storage is beyond me.
Old 11-17-2015, 12:11 PM
  #51  
secretcollector
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
secretcollector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Motor City
Posts: 659
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nuvolari612
There is no way a CGT with delivery miles is mechanically a better car than one with miles properly maintained.
This is such a fallacy. Somewhere along the line, it entered the body of public knowledge that cars that are never driven have inherent mechanical issues that require huge sums to rectify. This is true if they are not properly maintained, no doubt. However, today's serious collectors have the financial resources and expertise to properly maintain delivery-mileage cars from new with techniques that undoubtedly leave them in finer condition than any example that has been used. Remember, these are cars we're talking about - they're not organic and don't have self-healing properties. Any time you drive a car, you're creating wear and friction that lessens the original condition of each part.

To be clear that I'm not looking to create an argument with Nuvolari, I'm referring here to modern cars that have been in the right collections from new; for sure older cars that have been simply parked for long periods will have certain issues.
Old 11-17-2015, 01:01 PM
  #52  
richk
Drifting
 
richk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: los angeles and nyc
Posts: 3,235
Received 879 Likes on 364 Posts
Default

Interesting points by both of you. I will add when you are buying a pre-owned CGT, 4.0RS, F40 or any similar type car the ownership history is absolutely critical. Even with financial resources available not everybody cares for their cars in the same manner.

I have seen the way secret collector keeps his cars and wouldn't hesitate to buy from him. I have flown across the country looking to buy cars and have returned to LA many times passing on the car. I personally drive all my cars and I never worry about the miles. I've probably driven 250,000 miles in P-cars!!! Besides for my kids there is nothing that makes me happier.
Old 11-17-2015, 08:29 PM
  #53  
nuvolari612
Drifting
 
nuvolari612's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: midwest
Posts: 2,275
Received 127 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by secretcollector
This is such a fallacy. Somewhere along the line, it entered the body of public knowledge that cars that are never driven have inherent mechanical issues that require huge sums to rectify. This is true if they are not properly maintained, no doubt. However, today's serious collectors have the financial resources and expertise to properly maintain delivery-mileage cars from new with techniques that undoubtedly leave them in finer condition than any example that has been used. Remember, these are cars we're talking about - they're not organic and don't have self-healing properties. Any time you drive a car, you're creating wear and friction that lessens the original condition of each part.

To be clear that I'm not looking to create an argument with Nuvolari, I'm referring here to modern cars that have been in the right collections from new; for sure older cars that have been simply parked for long periods will have certain issues.
I have restored more cars that were said to be in perfect condition than those that had miles.

Agree no argument but very few people care about their unused exotic.

Purchased a Healey that was dry rot - which was fine but as I took it apart an old aluminum can was welded into the body. The car was represented as driven to the country club 3 Sundays a year for decades.

Anyway - I don't trust any cars past the first owner too much brain damage.
Old 11-17-2015, 10:30 PM
  #54  
NYC123
Banned
 
NYC123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by secretcollector
This is such a fallacy. Somewhere along the line, it entered the body of public knowledge that cars that are never driven have inherent mechanical issues that require huge sums to rectify. This is true if they are not properly maintained, no doubt. However, today's serious collectors have the financial resources and expertise to properly maintain delivery-mileage cars from new with techniques that undoubtedly leave them in finer condition than any example that has been used. Remember, these are cars we're talking about - they're not organic and don't have self-healing properties. Any time you drive a car, you're creating wear and friction that lessens the original condition of each part.

To be clear that I'm not looking to create an argument with Nuvolari, I'm referring here to modern cars that have been in the right collections from new; for sure older cars that have been simply parked for long periods will have certain issues.

I find serious collectors will maintain low mile cars but average owner who just bought a car years ago and never used it won't do much service , and neither will your average exotic dealer if the car has low miles and looks great. Personally I think the entire in the wrapper delivery mile car premium has been stretched a bit too far right now in the modern/semi modern porsche world, but that is just my opinion. I mean do the math, if guys are still trying to sell delivery mile gt3 rs 4.0 for literally 2x what a 5k mile car is worth (this is what the market was doing 6 months ago) ... then how collectible exactly is that car if your depreciation in the first 5k miles will be worse than a new mini van. I think its always smart to buy the best condition lowest mile you can afford , however only so much of a premium makes sense for just a few thousand miles...
Old 11-17-2015, 10:54 PM
  #55  
rickyn f355
Instructor
 
rickyn f355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by secretcollector
This is such a fallacy. Somewhere along the line, it entered the body of public knowledge that cars that are never driven have inherent mechanical issues that require huge sums to rectify. This is true if they are not properly maintained, no doubt. However, today's serious collectors have the financial resources and expertise to properly maintain delivery-mileage cars from new with techniques that undoubtedly leave them in finer condition than any example that has been used. Remember, these are cars we're talking about - they're not organic and don't have self-healing properties. Any time you drive a car, you're creating wear and friction that lessens the original condition of each part.

To be clear that I'm not looking to create an argument with Nuvolari, I'm referring here to modern cars that have been in the right collections from new; for sure older cars that have been simply parked for long periods will have certain issues.
I cldnt agree more
Old 11-18-2015, 09:29 AM
  #56  
nuvolari612
Drifting
 
nuvolari612's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: midwest
Posts: 2,275
Received 127 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NYC123
I find serious collectors will maintain low mile cars but average owner who just bought a car years ago and never used it won't do much service , and neither will your average exotic dealer if the car has low miles and looks great. Personally I think the entire in the wrapper delivery mile car premium has been stretched a bit too far right now in the modern/semi modern porsche world, but that is just my opinion. I mean do the math, if guys are still trying to sell delivery mile gt3 rs 4.0 for literally 2x what a 5k mile car is worth (this is what the market was doing 6 months ago) ... then how collectible exactly is that car if your depreciation in the first 5k miles will be worse than a new mini van. I think its always smart to buy the best condition lowest mile you can afford , however only so much of a premium makes sense for just a few thousand miles...
I agree - it's a different mindset sort of like stamp collecting . baseball cards . coins.

Qualified programs like F1 Mclaren and Ferrari Classiche - road going to maintain authenticity shatter that mold.

Porsche should do something similar and those wrapped cars would be perhaps worth less as the program would require participation events creating heritage and provenance while insuring it's authenticity.

Last edited by nuvolari612; 11-18-2015 at 10:27 PM.



Quick Reply: A simple question about the so-called "bubble"



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:44 PM.