Notices
987 Forum Discussion about the Cayman/Boxster variants (2004-2012)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2012 Porsche Cayman R opinions compare to BMW M3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-04-2015, 11:54 PM
  #1  
Hendraw72
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
 
Hendraw72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2012 Porsche Cayman R opinions compare to BMW M3

Hi All

I am new to the forum and just wanted to hear opinion from people that own 2011-2012 Porsche Cayman R.

I took a test drive for 2012 used Cayman R with manual gearbox and I enjoy it, really such a fun and fast car to drive but I never own a Porsche before and knowing it is a high performance car that can be expensive to maintain.

I went and check what the insurance cost difference and the Cayman R is about $20 more expensive than my current car.
What are the typical problems for this car? Is it expensive to maintain? How reliable it is as a daily driver? I don't track my car, but just enjoying driving. My current daily driver is 2009 E92 BMW M3 which seem really heavy compare to the Cayman R. Is it worth to trade the M3 to the Cayman R?

Any opinions is greatly appreciated

Thanks
Old 10-05-2015, 01:04 PM
  #2  
DBH
Three Wheelin'
 
DBH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,790
Received 430 Likes on 290 Posts
Default

I cannot answer directly as I have a 2015 Cayman GTS which is very similar to "R" both in performance and handling. However my previous car was a E92 M3.


My observations:
1) cost to maintain is similar to M3,
2) cost to insure was actually less,
3) straight line performance similar,
4) handling - Porsche is MUCH superior,
5) daily driving about the same (my cars manual trany) except the Porsche is a lot more fun!!!
Old 10-05-2015, 01:33 PM
  #3  
Hendraw72
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
 
Hendraw72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for your help.

I think the insurance is more expensive because the cayman R is newer 2012 compare to my 2009 M3 which is older.

Did you trade in the M3 to the GTS? The one thing I really did like on the M3 is the sound of the V8 engine, but you are right, the cayman is much more exciting to drive
Old 10-05-2015, 08:48 PM
  #4  
DBH
Three Wheelin'
 
DBH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,790
Received 430 Likes on 290 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hendraw72
Thanks for your help.

I think the insurance is more expensive because the cayman R is newer 2012 compare to my 2009 M3 which is older.

Did you trade in the M3 to the GTS? The one thing I really did like on the M3 is the sound of the V8 engine, but you are right, the cayman is much more exciting to drive
The price of insurance is dependent on too many variables. As long as you shop around, you'll find the lowest price for you.


Yes, I traded the M3 for the CGTS. Got a very good deal and ordered it just as I wanted it. One of the options included in the GTS model is the sport exhaust. Not sure if the R has this, but it is awesome!!


I recently received my copy of Excellence (Nov. '15) which includes an article comparing the R vs. GTS. I haven't read it yet, but it might give you some insight into the R.


Good luck and let us know what you decide to do.
Old 10-05-2015, 10:36 PM
  #5  
Hendraw72
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
 
Hendraw72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No sport exhaust and no light weight bucket seat on the Cayman R that I test drive, but it has AC, sound system and Sport Chrono thing.

I could live without sound system but I think the bucket seat looks damn cool unfortunately this one doesn't have it.

Let me know what you find in the article, although I am not sure I can afford the GTS

I'll think it over and see what I want, so damn tempting lol
Old 10-05-2015, 11:39 PM
  #6  
RDCR
Rennlist Member
 
RDCR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Santa Cruz - Norcal
Posts: 1,979
Received 482 Likes on 304 Posts
Default

The LWBs are not the best setup for a daily driver. I wouldn't pass on a CR because it didn't have those unless you're going to the track with it occasionally.
Old 10-06-2015, 01:20 PM
  #7  
Hendraw72
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
 
Hendraw72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the info. Still haven't decided to be honest. I really want one but I can't afford to have both
Old 10-06-2015, 07:08 PM
  #8  
number 9
Racer
 
number 9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Palm Beach County, FL
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I just sold my R to make room for a new gt4 due any day now. I strongly suggest you buy an R now with prices as they are! Get the sport exhaust but don't sweat the bucket seats unless you'll be tracking the car. You can always get back into an M3 but you'll probably never go back.
Old 10-06-2015, 08:01 PM
  #9  
Hendraw72
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
 
Hendraw72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks. I think the dealer is putting the price to be high knowing it is a "collector item" not sure how much I can get it lower, but I got a sense that people say it might be an investment car that might go up in value in the long term?
Old 10-06-2015, 08:47 PM
  #10  
masti99
Burning Brakes
 
masti99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,247
Received 106 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Go trade and enjoy the heck out of it!
Old 10-07-2015, 06:50 AM
  #11  
number 9
Racer
 
number 9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Palm Beach County, FL
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hendraw72
Thanks. I think the dealer is putting the price to be high knowing it is a "collector item" not sure how much I can get it lower, but I got a sense that people say it might be an investment car that might go up in value in the long term?
Look for a good used example from a private buyer! Why pay dealer markup when you could save a ton of money and help a fellow enthusiast sell their car?
Old 10-07-2015, 01:45 PM
  #12  
Hendraw72
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
 
Hendraw72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well one issue is that I live in Vancouver, Canada and we don't have that many stock of Cayman R available. I look around in Craigslist and that's the only one available. One option might be importing from US, but the exchange is so damn high right now .
Old 10-07-2015, 06:21 PM
  #13  
Hendraw72
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
 
Hendraw72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I notice something which I think it's kinda peculiar comparing Cayman R and the newer Cayman GTS.

Seem like based on the spec from Porsche itself, the Cayman R is slighty faster in term of 0-60 in 4.7 in manual compare to 4.9 in GTS also in manual. GTS has more horsepower 340 compare to 330 to the Cayman R. I assume that GTS is heavier than Cayman R?
Old 10-07-2015, 09:54 PM
  #14  
zedcat
Rennlist Member
 
zedcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,309
Received 356 Likes on 257 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hendraw72
I notice something which I think it's kinda peculiar comparing Cayman R and the newer Cayman GTS.

Seem like based on the spec from Porsche itself, the Cayman R is slighty faster in term of 0-60 in 4.7 in manual compare to 4.9 in GTS also in manual. GTS has more horsepower 340 compare to 330 to the Cayman R. I assume that GTS is heavier than Cayman R?
Porsche USA's spec for GTS is 0-60 in 4.6 sec. They are very close. I have a 12 R and a track buddy has a 15 GTS x73. Both 6MT. We are pretty close in lap times but he will pull on me a little on long straights. He also has the auto blip. I have to rev match on my own. The GTS interior is nicer but I like the feel of the R. Both great cars.
Old 10-08-2015, 01:45 AM
  #15  
golfnutintib
Rennlist Member
 
golfnutintib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: ..............
Posts: 3,859
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

c r has substantially more sporty feel and far far superior handling than e92 m3

both cars engines feel soft at low rpms, come on strong about 4K

m3 is a practical, everyday car with a silky, sporty feel - but relatively speaking it is heavy, softly sprung and ponderous

c r is a true sports car that is much less practical but much more exciting and has substantially higher fun to drive factor and cornering limits

don't know if a football analogy makes sense - m3 is an outside linebacker c r is a cover corner yeah both athletic one much more mass one changes direction alot better... both may get from a to b in same time but their nature is very different

c r has greater collector value even if driven - just too many e92 m3's out there


Quick Reply: 2012 Porsche Cayman R opinions compare to BMW M3



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:16 AM.