Tracking sector data
#61
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 18,672
Received 2,827 Likes
on
1,667 Posts
Ok, thank you. Missed it.
In racing and life, you generally get what you pay for!
In racing and life, you generally get what you pay for!
__________________
-Peter Krause
www.peterkrause.net
www.gofasternow.com
"Combining the Art and Science of Driving Fast!"
Specializing in Professional, Private Driver Performance Evaluation and Optimization
Consultation Available Remotely and at VIRginia International Raceway
-Peter Krause
www.peterkrause.net
www.gofasternow.com
"Combining the Art and Science of Driving Fast!"
Specializing in Professional, Private Driver Performance Evaluation and Optimization
Consultation Available Remotely and at VIRginia International Raceway
#62
Rennlist Member
Remember that the Gsum is really the same info as in a G-G diagram (friction circle). Sometimes it's helpful to use the G-G diagram to walk through a corner to see where the data comes off the theoretical outside of the graph and into the middle.
Here's some info on the G-G http://www.trailbrake.net/featured-a...he-g-g-diagram
Here's some info on the G-G http://www.trailbrake.net/featured-a...he-g-g-diagram
With the overlays these data-on-video systems provide you practically always get a bullseye format with the moving dot on the playback video.
Contrast that with the typical chart plots in the analysis software and you see oblong, or if you are really lucky square, reference lines instead.
Surely it would be one _heck_ of a lot more intuitive to read a G-G plot if reference lines were presented in bullseye format as well?!
[I understand that in some programs, RSA for example, you can't rely on the aspect ratio being "square" with the horizontal and vertical axis scales being the same dimensions, but even in that case a contour reference line that shows me where 1G radially is away from the centerspot would be so much more useful, circular or not.]
#63
Rennlist Hoonigan
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Since the topic of a G-G plot comes up, scatter or otherwise, I can't resist airing my pet peeve with these charts.
With the overlays these data-on-video systems provide you practically always get a bullseye format with the moving dot on the playback video.
Contrast that with the typical chart plots in the analysis software and you see oblong, or if you are really lucky square, reference lines instead.
Surely it would be one _heck_ of a lot more intuitive to read a G-G plot if reference lines were presented in bullseye format as well?!
[I understand that in some programs, RSA for example, you can't rely on the aspect ratio being "square" with the horizontal and vertical axis scales being the same dimensions, but even in that case a contour reference line that shows me where 1G radially is away from the centerspot would be so much more useful, circular or not.]
With the overlays these data-on-video systems provide you practically always get a bullseye format with the moving dot on the playback video.
Contrast that with the typical chart plots in the analysis software and you see oblong, or if you are really lucky square, reference lines instead.
Surely it would be one _heck_ of a lot more intuitive to read a G-G plot if reference lines were presented in bullseye format as well?!
[I understand that in some programs, RSA for example, you can't rely on the aspect ratio being "square" with the horizontal and vertical axis scales being the same dimensions, but even in that case a contour reference line that shows me where 1G radially is away from the centerspot would be so much more useful, circular or not.]
#64
Rennlist Member
It would be nice to have a way to put in a circle at some level, 1 G or otherwise. I think it's not always thought of because the X-Y charts are used for so many other things where that wouldn't be useful. I'll bring it up with the programmers at AiM. Maybe it will be added at some point.
[Truth in advertising: I'm a coder by training and practice so I feel like I earned a right to have an opinion on things like that but I grant you, User Interface code is one of my least favorite things to do because it's practically impossible to make all users happy! ]
#65
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 18,672
Received 2,827 Likes
on
1,667 Posts
Since the topic of a G-G plot comes up, scatter or otherwise, I can't resist airing my pet peeve with these charts.
With the overlays these data-on-video systems provide you practically always get a bullseye format with the moving dot on the playback video.
Contrast that with the typical chart plots in the analysis software and you see oblong, or if you are really lucky square, reference lines instead.
Surely it would be one _heck_ of a lot more intuitive to read a G-G plot if reference lines were presented in bullseye format as well?!
[I understand that in some programs, RSA for example, you can't rely on the aspect ratio being "square" with the horizontal and vertical axis scales being the same dimensions, but even in that case a contour reference line that shows me where 1G radially is away from the centerspot would be so much more useful, circular or not.]
With the overlays these data-on-video systems provide you practically always get a bullseye format with the moving dot on the playback video.
Contrast that with the typical chart plots in the analysis software and you see oblong, or if you are really lucky square, reference lines instead.
Surely it would be one _heck_ of a lot more intuitive to read a G-G plot if reference lines were presented in bullseye format as well?!
[I understand that in some programs, RSA for example, you can't rely on the aspect ratio being "square" with the horizontal and vertical axis scales being the same dimensions, but even in that case a contour reference line that shows me where 1G radially is away from the centerspot would be so much more useful, circular or not.]
Second off, they wouldn't be able to do this easily and still make a circle for EVERY possible car, as the accelerative capacity of an SP1 944 tops out at .4g positive and a 991 GT3 RS is double that!
So that will fix your issue in RSA!
#66
Rennlist Hoonigan
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
First off, no need for a programming change to the RSA software. Right click the longG measure channel you are using in the X-Y plot and adjust the range positive to about half the negative value.
Second off, they wouldn't be able to do this easily and still make a circle for EVERY possible car, as the accelerative capacity of an SP1 944 tops out at .4g positive and a 991 GT3 RS is double that!
So that will fix your issue in RSA!
Second off, they wouldn't be able to do this easily and still make a circle for EVERY possible car, as the accelerative capacity of an SP1 944 tops out at .4g positive and a 991 GT3 RS is double that!
So that will fix your issue in RSA!
I've discussed similar issues with the guys at AiM before in regards to being able to put a solid line in a measure. It would be helpful for things like RPM limits, coolant temps, etc (albeit in a regular strip chart).
#67
Rennlist Member
I think you misunderstood what he was asking for. He would like to to a G-G diagram on a circular background, not a rectangular grid. It would appear like a bullseye as it does on the video instead of a grid as it does now. He would also like it to have whole numbers for the circles, so it would show 1G, 2G, etc. It would still be up to the user to determine what is appropriate for their car.
I've discussed similar issues with the guys at AiM before in regards to being able to put a solid line in a measure. It would be helpful for things like RPM limits, coolant temps, etc (albeit in a regular strip chart).
Last edited by boxer-11; 11-28-2016 at 05:23 PM. Reason: format oopsie
#68
Rennlist Member
On motec when you do a track map you can use the background from google earth...
To get high defintion you need busnice client id, anyone knows what that is..?
To get high defintion you need busnice client id, anyone knows what that is..?
#69
Since the topic of a G-G plot comes up, scatter or otherwise, I can't resist airing my pet peeve with these charts.
With the overlays these data-on-video systems provide you practically always get a bullseye format with the moving dot on the playback video.
Contrast that with the typical chart plots in the analysis software and you see oblong, or if you are really lucky square, reference lines instead.
Surely it would be one _heck_ of a lot more intuitive to read a G-G plot if reference lines were presented in bullseye format as well?!
[I understand that in some programs, RSA for example, you can't rely on the aspect ratio being "square" with the horizontal and vertical axis scales being the same dimensions, but even in that case a contour reference line that shows me where 1G radially is away from the centerspot would be so much more useful, circular or not.]
With the overlays these data-on-video systems provide you practically always get a bullseye format with the moving dot on the playback video.
Contrast that with the typical chart plots in the analysis software and you see oblong, or if you are really lucky square, reference lines instead.
Surely it would be one _heck_ of a lot more intuitive to read a G-G plot if reference lines were presented in bullseye format as well?!
[I understand that in some programs, RSA for example, you can't rely on the aspect ratio being "square" with the horizontal and vertical axis scales being the same dimensions, but even in that case a contour reference line that shows me where 1G radially is away from the centerspot would be so much more useful, circular or not.]
CircleX 1.0 = sin('GPS Distance')
CircleY 1.0 = cos('GPS Distance')
CircleX 1.2 = 1.2*sin('GPS Distance')
CircleY 1.2 = 1.2*cos('GPS Distance')
Then overlay these on the G-G data: