Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

GT3 - 997.1 Vs. 997.2?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-2024, 08:36 PM
  #1  
Zeus993
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Zeus993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 6,166
Received 1,242 Likes on 573 Posts
Default GT3 - 997.1 Vs. 997.2?

Just looking at jumping back into a 997.1/2 GT3. Is there really that much difference between the .1 and .2?

Anyone owned both / one and then the other at some point in time?

Thanks,

JP
Old 04-08-2024, 12:24 AM
  #2  
Robocop305
Rennlist Member
 
Robocop305's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Miami
Posts: 2,061
Received 446 Likes on 259 Posts
Default

The following 2 users liked this post by Robocop305:
Joe Cho (04-09-2024), Zeus993 (04-08-2024)
Old 04-08-2024, 01:11 AM
  #3  
ChrisF
Rennlist Member
 
ChrisF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: La La Land
Posts: 4,144
Received 890 Likes on 336 Posts
Default

Both are great. I'd argue the suspension refinement, DEM's, .2 liters and revised interior make for a more enjoyable car. When i put down my dollars, that's what I bought (997.2).

There is no wrong choice.
The following 2 users liked this post by ChrisF:
911 (04-08-2024), Zeus993 (04-08-2024)
Old 04-08-2024, 01:38 AM
  #4  
Vocan
Rennlist Member
 
Vocan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 343
Received 245 Likes on 109 Posts
Default

I think that as these cars get older the differences matter less and less. The .2 has a more refined suspension from the factory but as these cars are approaching 15-20 years old and many have seen a good bit of track use, a lot of these cars aren't far off from a suspension refresh anyways to get the most out of them. If you insist on having Porsche parts, you can run either .1 or .2 suspension bits on a .1 with DSC when you do that refresh. Or you can swap to Ohlins, MCS, etc. and have better performing coilovers than either a .1 or .2 for less money. Interior differences mattered a lot more when PCCM+ wasn't an option on .1s as the original PCM is really dated.

If the look of one of them speaks to you more then I'd say to go down that route but otherwise you can't go wrong with either car and the overall experience is very similar. Find the nicest example of either that you can within your budget and enjoy it
The following 3 users liked this post by Vocan:
911 (04-09-2024), Robocop305 (04-08-2024), Zeus993 (04-08-2024)
Old 04-08-2024, 04:19 AM
  #5  
DJWGT3
Track Day
 
DJWGT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Have owned a MK1 for 4 years and now have a MK2. Both great cars. mk2 is more refined from the interior perspective- and the upgraded looks of the mk2 I do prefer (wing, front). Powerwise for me there is no difference, I,m not able push the GT3 as much as my driving skills are much to be improved.

What is a + for me is the addition of PSM (instead of only TC) so when in the wet in the swiss alps you'll feel much secure. I do like the CL look and there are much less MK2 produced (in general 911) so it keeps a more rare sight.

Overall I think you should be happy with both models- buy and dirve the car and stick to it- these are the next best thing in the line of great (and expensive) cars. Only 2200 produced (for each model MK1 and MK2).
The following users liked this post:
Robocop305 (04-08-2024)
Old 04-08-2024, 08:58 AM
  #6  
Hamhands
Rennlist Member
 
Hamhands's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 214
Received 166 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Buy the best example you can based on your preference in appearance.
The following users liked this post:
Elliotw44 (04-09-2024)
Old 04-08-2024, 11:08 AM
  #7  
Zeus993
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Zeus993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 6,166
Received 1,242 Likes on 573 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hamhands
Buy the best example you can based on your preference in appearance.
Thanks, guys. Appreicate your feedback. Good to hear on the swapable suspension between the .1 and .2.

As for the PCM, I just don't listen to music or talk on the phone when I'm driving these cars. Our Macan, yes, but a nice loud 911 or Spyder, no. So I must admit I'm leaning to a .1..

JP

Last edited by Zeus993; 04-08-2024 at 11:10 AM.
The following 2 users liked this post by Zeus993:
Acropora8 (04-09-2024), Robocop305 (04-09-2024)
Old 04-08-2024, 11:09 AM
  #8  
jreifler
Rennlist Member
 
jreifler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 1,466
Received 918 Likes on 435 Posts
Default

Unless you're driving them back-to-back, the differences are negligible.

The radio and HVAC controls on .1 are a little dated relative to .2. But the aesthetics are a matter of personal preference, and once you're actually driving one, the very last thing you're thinking about is the center console . . .

The PASM on .2 is definitely more refined. .1 ride is thus a bit harsher / less nuanced, but not in a way that impacts confidence in the car or its actual handling for most mortals. If you're wringing out 10ths of seconds on lap times, the .2 will be faster.

The 3.8 has a torque advantage. It's felt most noticeably between 3-6k. I find the .1 motor to have a more linear power and torque delivery, and overall, to be a smoother revving motor.

Truly all minor differences in the grand scheme. Agree with observations to choose on condition and spec, and on whatever else strikes you emotionally. Not a bad decision to be made.
The following users liked this post:
911 (04-08-2024)
Old 04-08-2024, 11:54 AM
  #9  
Bxstr
Rennlist Member
 
Bxstr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 8,363
Likes: 0
Received 2,965 Likes on 2,044 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zeus993
Thanks, guys. Appreicate your feedback. Good to hear on the swapable suspension between the .1 and .2.

As for the PCM, I just don't listen to music or talk on the phone when I'm driving these cars. Our Macan, yes, but a nice loud 911 or Spyder, no. So I must admit I'm leaning to a .1..

JP
If you did want the better PCM, the PCCM+ is a great upgrade.
The following users liked this post:
Robocop305 (04-09-2024)
Old 04-08-2024, 12:17 PM
  #10  
vma1788
Rennlist Member
 
vma1788's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 291 Likes on 152 Posts
Default

Had both. Can't go wrong. I would say buy the car you can afford. Not sure what people mean when they say the 3.6 feels revier. I think they both feel a bout the same. Maybe off-idle revs on the 3.6 are a bit more crisp.

.2 has much better (usable) oem audio equipment, while the .1 you need to upgrade or just delete the radio.
The following users liked this post:
SupraSaiyan (04-09-2024)
Old 04-08-2024, 12:43 PM
  #11  
DDSLT5
Rennlist Member
 
DDSLT5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 98
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jreifler
Unless you're driving them back-to-back, the differences are negligible.

The radio and HVAC controls on .1 are a little dated relative to .2. But the aesthetics are a matter of personal preference, and once you're actually driving one, the very last thing you're thinking about is the center console . . .

The PASM on .2 is definitely more refined. .1 ride is thus a bit harsher / less nuanced, but not in a way that impacts confidence in the car or its actual handling for most mortals. If you're wringing out 10ths of seconds on lap times, the .2 will be faster.

The 3.8 has a torque advantage. It's felt most noticeably between 3-6k. I find the .1 motor to have a more linear power and torque delivery, and overall, to be a smoother revving motor.

Truly all minor differences in the grand scheme. Agree with observations to choose on condition and spec, and on whatever else strikes you emotionally. Not a bad decision to be made.
This is an excellent summary.
The following 2 users liked this post by DDSLT5:
jreifler (04-09-2024), Zeus993 (04-08-2024)
Old 04-08-2024, 03:13 PM
  #12  
monk46
Rennlist Member
 
monk46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 69
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I have both. All of the above are accurate - mostly subtle differences, the .2 being a bit more refined.
You will likely get the most satisfaction out of the best example of either that you can find.
The following 3 users liked this post by monk46:
911 (04-09-2024), shotor (04-08-2024), Zeus993 (04-09-2024)
Old 04-08-2024, 04:09 PM
  #13  
RAudi Driver
Rennlist Member
 
RAudi Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: West Coast
Posts: 8,810
Received 2,733 Likes on 1,637 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by monk46
I
You will likely get the most satisfaction out of the best example of either that you can find.
there is nothing better than getting a car in great condition with no issues.
The following 2 users liked this post by RAudi Driver:
pcar1 (04-10-2024), Zeus993 (04-09-2024)
Old 04-08-2024, 06:22 PM
  #14  
shotor
Rennlist Member
 
shotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 241
Received 28 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

What monk said above.

.1
No cam actuator problems
No CL
Dated radio - But now with factory update
Little less torque - Will you notice on the street?
Theoretically installation of rear seats easier

.2
No sunroof [I like this]
Little more torque
Better suspension - But now needs a refresh
CL - god I hate these things

The following 5 users liked this post by shotor:
911 (04-09-2024), Elliotw44 (04-09-2024), GTTommy (04-08-2024), Robocop305 (04-09-2024), Zeus993 (04-09-2024)
Old 04-08-2024, 09:05 PM
  #15  
G80
Rennlist Member
 
G80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2024
Posts: 71
Received 59 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

I was recently in the market mainly for a .1. I lost an auction narrowly (should have bid more!) and immediately regretted not bidding more. I ended up searching up and down the internet and ended up in a .2.

To me there doesn’t seem to be a huge amount of difference but good examples are thin on the ground and when you find one, you may have competition to buy it.

I would search for both and keep an open mind. When the right car comes up, be ready to jump on it!
The following 4 users liked this post by G80:
911 (04-09-2024), pcar1 (04-10-2024), Robocop305 (04-09-2024), Zeus993 (04-09-2024)


Quick Reply: GT3 - 997.1 Vs. 997.2?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:54 AM.