Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

Clutch on 997 GT2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-26-2014, 09:27 AM
  #46  
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
TB993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,440
Received 108 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by emmo.84
Looking at the RS 4.0 pressure plate, it seemed reinforced vecause of the triple bands on the perimeter, plus they're bolted and not riveted, I understand the spring is lighter than a 764, and that's what I was looking for, but I can't uderstand the fact that a reinforced pressure plate and new RS 4.0 disk do not hold the torque and power of a 997 GT2...

Maybe they have to 'couple' themselves for perfect contact??
You should have asked RS Tuning to sell you their clutch set up, if you have bought their ECU then you are a customer and they would have obliged...
Old 09-29-2014, 11:41 AM
  #47  
emmo.84
Track Day
 
emmo.84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 100 cats

Have 100 cats on my 2009 GT2 and they sound louder and better. No DB problems on the circuit in any case.
I have Supersprint cat because they use the HJC trimetallic net which is the best. I don't remember if that name is correct, but it's the best material on the market.
They are Marked HJC Motorsport on the outside.
Paired with mild ECU tune 100 cells are a great improvement. Clutch will hold if you do not exagerate with track use.
Otherwise, as in my other post, you are up to some seriously hard pressure plate, the Sachs 764.
Clutch disk is not an issue as far as I've experimented
Old 09-29-2014, 11:44 AM
  #48  
emmo.84
Track Day
 
emmo.84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi TB 993tt, I have the RS tuning Clutch setup, wich is 764 + sachs racing organic disc.

The problem is that the 764 it's way to hard in pedal feel for street use!
And I was trying to get rid of it.
But can't find much else around...
I don't think one clutch disk or the other makes any difference, I tried 3!
Old 09-29-2014, 01:39 PM
  #49  
Kevin
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Kevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest
Posts: 9,303
Received 305 Likes on 211 Posts
Default

Emmo, something is wrong with your installation. Your wrench must have cracked the pressure plate OR caught a needle bearing and jambed it into the cap. My wife along with Toby's wife can operate the 764 PP. I respect a woman that can "handle" the non sprung disk.

If all is well with the 764 installation, In gest I suggest that you hit the gym and start working on the leg press. OR, retrofit the turbo hydraulic slave assist to help you out. BTW, the 4.0 ltr pressure plate is 15 to 20% less clamp force vs the 764 PP.

The 764 PP is about 30% stiffer vs the stock turbo plate MAX.. If you have engagement issues, it usually is a installation issue. Needle bearings, nylon bushings, pin and grease selection.
Old 11-19-2014, 04:33 PM
  #50  
mm450exc
Instructor
 
mm450exc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London, UK
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kevin
Guys, to shed a little information on the Porsche clutches...

Everything is based off the flywheel. Once you have figured out your flywheel>> three factory choices. Then you can start to build your clutch kit..

The reason why we want to focus on the flywheel "is" it dictates which clutch disk one MUST use. For instance you cannot use the 996GT3 or997GT3 4.0 ltr or GT2RS clutch disk WITH a dual mass flywheel. You cannot install that disk in a 996GT2 or 997GT2. Guy have tried, and then on startup you find yourself not being able to get the car in gear of out of gear.. It is a common mistake.

I'm going to skip the clutch disk options for a moment and jump over to the pressure plates. There are 4 factory Sachs pressure plates that get tossed into the mix. Many internet and parts houses for the last 20 years have opted to insert the 964 NA pressure paired with the 964 RS lightweight flywheel. This has happened for years, on 993TT and 996TT. I still get emails and parts breakdowns with shops trying to install it on 997TT/GT2.. Flat out THAT NA pressure plate will not work. The plate will fail within the first week. I think that there is confusion between the 764 plate and the 964NA car when they look at the RS parts breakdown.

The 2nd plate is the Turbo pressure plate. The plate that leaves the factory 993TT, 996TT, 996GT2, 997TT, and 997GT2... Over the years part numbers have changed, but it is still the factory TURBO plate. It is a bullet proof plate but will NOT hold with a good tune. It is foolish to install this pressure plate when you can get two other factory pressure plates that do a better job.

The 3rd plate is a Sachs Race Motorsports plate with a part number that ends in 752.. This plate is a upgrade over the factory Turbo plate. It is great for the stock turbo 993TT, 996TT, 996GT2 and 997GT2RS.. With the normal bolt on mods this plate works well. BUT will not hold more aggressive tunes and track outings.

The 4th plate and best factory Sachs Race Motorsports plate ends in 764. Toby refers this as the 890Nm unit. It would be easier for newbies to call it the 764/890Nm plate. I can post the physical differences of this plate vs others in another post.. This is really the best choice for a replacement clutch, whether you keep the dual mass flywheel or not.

Warning>> Do not get caught up in the sales marketing STAGED kit numbers.. You can get hosed big time. For the Turbo and GT2/GT2RS owner, make sure you ASK which pressure plate you are getting.. Turbo, 752 or 764.... Call it the Stage Master blaster XYZ.. But in the end get the pressure plate that you want to fit your driving and power output. With that said, the 764 plate can and does fail. Drag strip runs, race track events, and extreme HP outputs will make short life of this plate.

The next topic area is the clutch disks. And over the years Sachs has modified the disks to keep up with better manufacturing and higher torque outputs.. I will make a few blanket statements to clear up some myths.

a) The factory 996GT2 disk is a solid centered NON sprung disk. It has a slight edge in torque rating vs the standard turbo disk (the turbo disk is sprung) the organic lining between the two disks are the same.

b) You cannot install a 996GT2 disk and/or 997GT2 disk with a factory lightweight flywheel. The reason is.. The flywheel is thicker>it is closer to the backwall of the transmission bellhousing. Be careful, standard turbo and GT2 disk can only be paired with the dual mass flywheel.

c) The BEST and strongest clutch disk for track use has been the 996GT3 and new improved 4.0 ltr disk. These disks are sprung to absorb the energy since the lightweight RS flywheel is in place. You cannot use these disk with the dual mass flywheel. They are to tall, and the sprung center doesn't clear the internal cavity between the dual mass and pressure plate. Sachs has redesigned the 997 4.0 disk with smaller diameter springs to reduce the rattle. I favor the 996GT3 disk since the organic lining is the same as the 4.0. The torque output rating is similar. The 4.0 with the new springs can handle more torque at extreme RPM's which our turbo engines don't see.

The last option from Sachs is 4 puck race (bronze) clutch disks. These coupled with the RS LWFW turn street driving into a nightmare. You have to rev the engine to 3500 to 4K to get the car moving. The reason for this disk is because the organic lining just isn't up to the task and heat in racing. One option prior to getting the 4 puck version is to use a aftermarket lining manufactured in Canada. It comes with a 6 puck or 8 puck glass lining and one removes the factory organic from either the Rigid GT2 disk or Preferred GT3 disks. This is the better choice for High Output street cars. Once you smoke these disks, you need to upgrade to twin disk and carbon multi disk systems. Such as Tilton units.

Lastly, like I mentioned in the beginning, the flywheels dictate the clutch choice. It is a flow chart, that has to be explained to your tuner. One clutch kit doesn't fit all the boxes. You could have a stock output 997GT2.. But you race it twice a week in DE or open events. If that is the case I would strongly recommend the RS lightweight flywheel with the 764/890Nm pressure plate and either the 996GT3 clutch disk or 4.0 clutch disk. For tuned engines, I would recommend the same. If the GT2 that gets track is tuned, one can recommend the 8 puck glass lining built on the GT3 disk.

My personal opinion, I don't recommend the factory dual mass when placed into service on the track. I think that the LWFW is better option. Modern tuning today will deal with the previous year stalls and low RPM bucking. The noise or rattle will still be there. But if you have a loud exhaust, who cares.. Shedding 18 lbs of weight pays in the long run. Find a fellow Rennlister to get some seat time in. Please note that many failed LWFW kit have been sold over the years. It is a failure to use any LWFW with a non sprung clutch disk. Many kits come with the GT2 clutch disk. It turns this kit into a nightmare light switch event.

There is a difference between the RS flywheels. The early CUP design is tweaked for production in the 997RS.. The ONLY difference is that it is roughly 2 lbs lighter vs the 964 RS flywheel. 9.2 lbs vs 10.5 to 11.0 lbs. What is different is>> the DME trigger ring is back cut. With the RS flywheel, you have finger for the DME trigger wheel (60 -2) versus solid teeth on the 964 unit. I recommend the 964 RS LWFW.

I have sold hundreds of these kits and no two owners are the same. If you hate the LWFW rattle, go with a dual mass kit. Make sure that you are getting the 764 pressure plate.. FYI, I sell the RS LWFW kit with the 996GT3 clutch disk and 764 pressure plate for $2,295.00 If you want the 4.0 disk it's $200 more.. Feel free to email or call me...
Kevin,

You can fit the 4.0 clutch to a 2010 GT3 with dual mass flywheel. Done it today.

Just minor modification to the 4.0 pressure plate. The "extra" thread on the 3 screws (forward facing) needs to be removed otherwise they will touch in the bell housing and the engine will (can) not turn over.
Attached Images  
Old 05-07-2015, 02:56 PM
  #51  
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
TB993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,440
Received 108 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kevin
My wife along with Toby's wife can operate the 764 PP. I respect a woman that can "handle" the non sprung disk.
Currently having a new clutch installed and turns out I have the 764PP with the sprung 996GT3RS disc (and LWFW)..... I am now slightly worried that the previously silent clutch set up will return sounding like a cement mixer as others have found
Old 05-07-2015, 03:26 PM
  #52  
Kevin
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Kevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest
Posts: 9,303
Received 305 Likes on 211 Posts
Default

Toby, I knew it... (smile).. As a foot note, you can have the 996GT3RS disk rebuild (relined). The lining can be replaced. It is the disk (springs) that will cause the cement mixer sound. Basically you originally got the holy grail. 1 out of 1000.. Your luck this time might not be as good. BTW, I'd like to "have" that old disk from you.. I would also recommend upgrading to the newer Sachs pressure plate with the bolted cover. It is suppose to be able to handle 1000Nm vs the 890Nm 764 plate.
Old 05-07-2015, 03:33 PM
  #53  
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
TB993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,440
Received 108 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kevin
Toby, I knew it... (smile).. As a foot note, you can have the 996GT3RS disk rebuild (relined). The lining can be replaced. It is the disk (springs) that will cause the cement mixer sound. Basically you originally got the holy grail. 1 out of 1000.. Your luck this time might not be as good. BTW, I'd like to "have" that old disk from you.. I would also recommend upgrading to the newer Sachs pressure plate with the bolted cover. It is suppose to be able to handle 1000Nm vs the 890Nm 764 plate.
Yes you were right all along

What is the number for the new PP, it is too late now as the 764 is being installed tomorrow.
Can one tell by testing the sprung disc if it is going to be "rattler" ?
Old 05-07-2015, 03:52 PM
  #54  
Kevin
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Kevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest
Posts: 9,303
Received 305 Likes on 211 Posts
Default

You really don't know until it's installed. You can go thru a handful of disks and select the one which springs are tighter in the hub. Some will rattle right in your hands when you shake them.
Old 05-08-2015, 05:22 AM
  #55  
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
TB993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,440
Received 108 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

On closer enquiry (actually getting the old one's part number - why do shops BS on this stuff 11?) my disc is in fact the 997GT3RS 4.0 unit 997 116 013 91, maybe that is less of a rattler ?

Last edited by TB993tt; 05-08-2015 at 05:39 AM.
Old 05-08-2015, 01:54 PM
  #56  
Kevin
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Kevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest
Posts: 9,303
Received 305 Likes on 211 Posts
Default

Yes, the 4.0 liter disk is quieter...

I have it pictured in this thread...

https://rennlist.com/forums/997-gt2-...-445-00-a.html
Old 05-08-2015, 02:00 PM
  #57  
John@Fabspeed
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
John@Fabspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fort Washington, Pa
Posts: 4,719
Received 56 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Great thread
__________________
Porsche Performance Specialist
John@Fabspeed.com
215-618-9796

Fabspeed Motorsport USA
155 Commerce Drive Fort Washington, PA 19034
www.Fabspeed.com


Old 03-01-2017, 06:12 AM
  #58  
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
TB993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,440
Received 108 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

I read with interest some stuff on 6Bling where Powderhound mentions an alternative pressure plate to the 999.764.

There is now listed by ZF Sachs a pressure plate ending 001.487, the plate is rated at the same 890NM and Powderhound explains that it is bolted not riveted (if I understood correctly) which makes it more durable for high rev application, I am thinking they developed this for motors like 9ff built - turbo charged GT3 Mezgers.

Powderhound also mention that the 487 PP drives better than the 764.

I currently run 764 PP with GT3 4.0 disc and would be interested if anyone could comment on the new 487PP and how it is different to the 764 and how it may feel "different" to the 764, in what way "different". ?
Old 03-01-2017, 06:19 PM
  #59  
Kevin
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Kevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest
Posts: 9,303
Received 305 Likes on 211 Posts
Default

Toby, if you look at post 50, you will see a similar picture of the 487 PP. The Sachs Race Engineering plate is a near clone to what is pictured. The bolts are used to hold down the retaining straps vs the rivits used on the 764 plate. If your engine is race duty with RPM north of 8K a update might be worth it. I don't know what your Rev limiter is set at.

I have not had a chance to tear down the new 487 PP, however from what I have seen and measured the 764 shares all the components (other than the bolts).
Old 03-02-2017, 05:43 AM
  #60  
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
TB993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,440
Received 108 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Thanks Kev, I am reving to 7400rpm max so I'm sure the 764 suffices.

I was intrigued by Pwdrhound's comments on the 487 somehow being "better" to use, I think he was saying it had less moment of inertia which somehow made it superior in use than the 764 even on lower rev applications ?


Quick Reply: Clutch on 997 GT2



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:02 AM.