Notices
996 Turbo Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Mobil 1 0W40 at amazon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-2017, 12:01 AM
  #31  
911mhawk
Rennlist Member
 
911mhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,804
Received 175 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

I have one sample for Blackstone I took about 2k miles ago and am about to change my oil again before the next track event so I can send them 2 samples to compare. Will be happy to post the results for some experienced commentary on what I am looking at after running M1 5w-50 for several oil changes.

My interest lies primarily in monitoring engine wear/condition over time based off the results.
Would be happy to try the Motul Kevin is running after this next round of M1 5w-50 since my change intervals are ~1k with a consistent mix of city/hwy/track.
Old 02-20-2017, 12:18 AM
  #32  
PCA1983
Rennlist Member
 
PCA1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Orlando burbs
Posts: 3,022
Received 445 Likes on 305 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porschetech3
Well I don't mean to be argumentative, and I'm not saying the new oil is better, but I'm convinced it has more high pressure wear resistance, and that is what I'm more concerned with.This guy is an engineer and has tested over 200 different oils. I can give you a link to the blog but is is way more information than most people want. Here is just a little insert from the link.


This is the only side by side tests I have ever seen on extreme pressure oil film. Out of over 200 oils tested,
the 0w40 mobil 1 "FS" ranked #3 and the old version 0w40 mobil 1 ranked #106




3. 0W40 Mobil 1 “FS” European Car Formula, ACEA A3/B3, A3/B4, API SN, synthetic = 127,221 psi
This new oil replaces the older version called, 0W40 Mobil 1, European Formula, API SN, synthetic. See below for
the older version’s ranking position.
zinc = TBD
phos = TBD
moly = TBD
This new “FS” version was tested in Summer 2016. This oil produced the highest psi value ever seen in my testing,
from any motor oil just as it comes right out of the bottle, with no aftermarket additives. Very impressive.

I also went on to test this oil at the much higher temperature of 275*F. At that elevated temperature, any hotter
and thinner oil is expected to experience a drop in Wear Protection Capability. This oil did have a 16% drop in
capability. But, even at that elevated temperature, it produced an impressive 106,876 psi, which still kept this
much hotter and thinner oil in the INCREDIBLE Wear Protection Category.

I also tested this oil to find out its onset of thermal breakdown, which was 280F.



106. 0W40 Mobil 1, European Formula, API SN, made in the U.S., synthetic = 82,644 psi
This is an earlier version that has been replaced by 0W40 Mobil 1 “FS” European Car Formula. See above for the newer
version’s ranking position.
zinc = TBD
phos = TBD
moly = TBD
I'm an engineer too. That engineer might be paid to sell that. I don't see any results for the 4-ball wear test. And oxidation tests are important too, but missing. But I am suspicious of the new oil if the viscosity and flash point are lower, and the ash test is higher. These test results are going the wrong way. I'm not convinced. Show me the 4 ball wear and oxidation tests. maybe the cost of the new one is lower and that's why they are pushing it....

​​​​​​If y'all are telling me they want more than 3 times as much money for it, then we all have va pretty good idea why they are pushing it. If it's still $25.47 for 5 qts at Wal-Mart, then maybe we should continue this discussion.

Last edited by PCA1983; 02-20-2017 at 12:44 AM.
Old 02-20-2017, 12:30 AM
  #33  
911mhawk
Rennlist Member
 
911mhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,804
Received 175 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by powdrhound
Hey Kevin,
As you know I've been running M1 5W50 for about 4 years now. I'm thinking about trying the M1 racing 0W50. Do you have any experience with it? At $18/quart it's pricey but supposed to have tons of the good stuff but no detergents. I would run this during track season when I'm doing oil changes about every 500-800 track miles, or about every two month so the lack of detergents should not be an issue. Probably not good for cats but I'd run catless during track season. Off season I would run the 5w50. What say you? Thanks....


[url=https://flic.kr/p/S4f38c]
Hopefully there's some serious benefit for more than twice the cost of 5w-50.

Sometimes I think why not just use M1 5w-40tdt for le$$ since I'm changing the oil so often? I mean after 500-1000 hard miles how do they all compare anyways?
Old 02-20-2017, 04:54 AM
  #34  
DaveCarrera4
Three Wheelin'
 
DaveCarrera4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,814
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

So... where are you all finding the best price on M1 5W 50?
Old 02-20-2017, 12:18 PM
  #35  
911mhawk
Rennlist Member
 
911mhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,804
Received 175 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DaveCarrera4
So... where are you all finding the best price on M1 5W 50?
I buy from the lubricant store for $8/qt to your porch.
Old 02-20-2017, 12:59 PM
  #36  
mdkelly1
Rennlist Member
 
mdkelly1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vero Beach, FL.
Posts: 661
Received 174 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

+2 Lubricant Store: http://thelubricantstore.com/mobil-1tm-5w50-6x1qt.html
Old 02-20-2017, 03:45 PM
  #37  
Porschetech3
Rennlist Member
 
Porschetech3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Alabama USA
Posts: 6,051
Received 4,320 Likes on 1,958 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 09RedGTS
I'm an engineer too. That engineer might be paid to sell that. I don't see any results for the 4-ball wear test. And oxidation tests are important too, but missing. But I am suspicious of the new oil if the viscosity and flash point are lower, and the ash test is higher. These test results are going the wrong way. I'm not convinced. Show me the 4 ball wear and oxidation tests. maybe the cost of the new one is lower and that's why they are pushing it....

​​​​​​If y'all are telling me they want more than 3 times as much money for it, then we all have va pretty good idea why they are pushing it. If it's still $25.47 for 5 qts at Wal-Mart, then maybe we should continue this discussion.
The engineer claims he is not paid or associated with any oil company, as his test has over 200 different oils and the brands different oils range all through the ratings.While he admits oxidations and other factors are important and are not included in his extreme pressure wear test, and also viscosity is very helpfull in maintaining higher oil pressure to ensure proper hydrodynamic function of main and rod bearings,it is not a factor in border and mixed bearing functiion or sliding function of all other high pressure wear items. Hence the use of thinner oils (0w20) in NASCAR and other forms of high performance. This is the result of the oil film of the additive package of each particular blend.

I have not seen any side by side test using the four ball test on these or any other interesting oils, if you can post a link I would love to see the test on the "old" vs "new" 0w40 Mobil 1 and also the "new" FSX2 5w50 Mobil 1 vs the "old 5w50 Mobil 1. I am always will to learn and change my mind if the data supports it.
Old 02-20-2017, 03:56 PM
  #38  
powdrhound
Rennlist Member
 
powdrhound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,814
Received 1,707 Likes on 995 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DaveCarrera4
So... where are you all finding the best price on M1 5W 50?
My local NAPA carries it and whenever they run a $5.99 sale I stock up
Old 02-20-2017, 04:01 PM
  #39  
justabout
Rennlist Member
 
justabout's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,275
Received 288 Likes on 212 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porschetech3
The engineer claims he is not paid or associated with any oil company, as his test has over 200 different oils and the brands different oils range all through the ratings.While he admits oxidations and other factors are important and are not included in his extreme pressure wear test, and also viscosity is very helpfull in maintaining higher oil pressure to ensure proper hydrodynamic function of main and rod bearings,it is not a factor in border and mixed bearing functiion or sliding function of all other high pressure wear items. Hence the use of thinner oils (0w20) in NASCAR and other forms of high performance. This is the result of the oil film of the additive package of each particular blend.

I have not seen any side by side test using the four ball test on these or any other interesting oils, if you can post a link I would love to see the test on the "old" vs "new" 0w40 Mobil 1 and also the "new" FSX2 5w50 Mobil 1 vs the "old 5w50 Mobil 1. I am always will to learn and change my mind if the data supports it.
So basically, the rings and camshafts might not be protected better since these experience boundary lubrication (camshaft load to high and rings slow down and reverse direction so hydrodynamic lubrication is less). Higher viscosity would be better for these cases.
Old 02-20-2017, 04:19 PM
  #40  
PCA1983
Rennlist Member
 
PCA1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Orlando burbs
Posts: 3,022
Received 445 Likes on 305 Posts
Default

Just bought some.Mobil1 0W-40 for $25.47/ 5 qts. For track rats in warm times of the year, with temps of say 50F to 100+F, i would certainly agree with the use of 5W-50 Mobil1
Old 02-20-2017, 04:59 PM
  #41  
Porschetech3
Rennlist Member
 
Porschetech3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Alabama USA
Posts: 6,051
Received 4,320 Likes on 1,958 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by justabout
So basically, the rings and camshafts might not be protected better since these experience boundary lubrication (camshaft load to high and rings slow down and reverse direction so hydrodynamic lubrication is less). Higher viscosity would be better for these cases.
Bearings that operate in Hydrodynamic function can benefit from the higher oil pressure provided by thicker higher viscosity oil since liquid is not compressible the metals never touch, If a bearing is in hydrodynamiic mode it doesn't matter what liquid is there ,no liquid is compressible. Parts or bearings that operate in boundary or mixed lubrication need high pressure film strength. Parts or bearings with very tight clearances or hard to get to places can benefit from thinner less viscous oil ( as long as it has very high film strength) due to better flow and can get in and out faster and cooler. Film strength and viscosity are not linear.It is a very complicated subject and some compromises will always have to be made.
Old 02-20-2017, 06:13 PM
  #42  
jimq
Burgled
Rennlist Member
 
jimq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Altamonte Springs, Fl/Gwynns Island, Va.
Posts: 22,385
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Got the oil today and it says FS.
Old 02-20-2017, 08:06 PM
  #43  
Kevinmacd
Rennlist Member
 
Kevinmacd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SE Florida
Posts: 2,740
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DaveCarrera4
So... where are you all finding the best price on M1 5W 50?
Amazon currently has it for $49 case of 6 with free shipping!
Old 02-20-2017, 11:38 PM
  #44  
Alan A
Burning Brakes
 
Alan A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 1,101
Received 27 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

The OP Amazon stuff is the newer FS formula if anyone is still unsure.
Old 02-21-2017, 01:25 AM
  #45  
Porschetech3
Rennlist Member
 
Porschetech3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Alabama USA
Posts: 6,051
Received 4,320 Likes on 1,958 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jimq
Got the oil today and it says FS.
Well that's good. I went to O'Reiley's last week and they had both on the shelf all mixed together,and only had 1 5qt jug of FS and had to go to the back and get more FS single quarts to give me 5 singles.


Quick Reply: Mobil 1 0W40 at amazon



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:12 AM.