Notices
996 Turbo Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

How much does the X50 option add?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-27-2015, 10:04 PM
  #106  
TheBucketOfTruth
Burning Brakes
 
TheBucketOfTruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 825
Received 245 Likes on 149 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by autobonrun
With your background, maybe you can answer a question related to the 996TT's. When these cars are not under boost, am I correct to assume that as a minimum the 3.6 engine can still produce the same horsepower and torque as the NA 996?
Not who you were asking, but some of that might depend on compression ratio differences. In any case, any time you actually need power to do anything in a Turbo you likely won't be in a zero boost situation.
Old 03-27-2015, 10:11 PM
  #107  
Dock
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Dock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 12,131
Received 766 Likes on 543 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by autobonrun
When these cars are not under boost, am I correct to assume that as a minimum the 3.6 engine can still produce the same horsepower and torque as the NA 996?
I don't think so.
Old 03-27-2015, 10:13 PM
  #108  
autobonrun
Rennlist Member
 
autobonrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: kansas
Posts: 2,710
Received 404 Likes on 256 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TheBucketOfTruth
Not who you were asking, but some of that might depend on compression ratio differences. In any case, any time you actually need power to do anything in a Turbo you likely won't be in a zero boost situation.
Hmm. I was wondering how much HP and torque is available and being generated when you pull off briskly but the boost gauge only indicates 0 or 0.1. The point I was going to make is if it is at least the same as the NA car, 300+ HP is sufficient for normal driving. But I think you're absolutely right, some level of boost is needed to even achieve NA power just based on the design, compression ratios, etc.
Old 03-28-2015, 10:51 AM
  #109  
"02996ttx50
Banned
 
"02996ttx50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,522
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

thats a great question. take away the snails and i think you're very near what might be the numbers for an n/a 996. but thats just a hunch, i have no idea. the cpl times I've been in limp mode though, it sure feels like a normally aspirated 996 might and my ol 993 with its massive 275 hp felt peppier. lol.

limp mode though is probably further ecu limited than simply "no boost". i dunno.
Old 03-28-2015, 12:41 PM
  #110  
cdk4219
Rennlist Member
 
cdk4219's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,332
Received 327 Likes on 230 Posts
Default U

Originally Posted by "02996ttx50
thats a great question. take away the snails and i think you're very near what might be the numbers for an n/a 996. but thats just a hunch, i have no idea. the cpl times I've been in limp mode though, it sure feels like a normally aspirated 996 might and my ol 993 with its massive 275 hp felt peppier. lol.

limp mode though is probably further ecu limited than simply "no boost". i dunno.
I would guess that from the engines that I have added turbos to , that the factors directly rated lower hp numbers are, increased backpressure from the turbine side, decrease in airflow on the compresor or cold side ( intercoolers, smaller piping, restrictions from the turbo inlet and outlet without the wheel spinning, lower compression, different timing maps, and camshaft design also don't help either.
I would say that the airflow restrictions in the turbo and piping needed are the biggest culprits, but I would suspect the peak hp number down 10% or so, but low rpm power without boost down quite a bit more.
When I add a turbo to a car, driving it around with the wastegate open seems to dull the reaction and pep of the car, nothing else done, and that is to an engine that was designed to be normally aspirated
Old 03-28-2015, 12:46 PM
  #111  
"02996ttx50
Banned
 
"02996ttx50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,522
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cdk4219
I would guess that from the engines that I have added turbos to , that the factors directly rated lower hp numbers are, increased backpressure from the turbine side, decrease in airflow on the compresor or cold side ( intercoolers, smaller piping, restrictions from the turbo inlet and outlet without the wheel spinning, lower compression, different timing maps, and camshaft design also don't help either.
I would say that the airflow restrictions in the turbo and piping needed are the biggest culprits, but I would suspect the peak hp number down 10% or so, but low rpm power without boost down quite a bit more.
When I add a turbo to a car, driving it around with the wastegate open seems to dull the reaction and pep of the car, nothing else done.
i know nothing if not very little of the mechanics of any of this stuff. i'm a driver is all, but i marvel and learn often from you guys that have actual experiential data from your own real world tinkering. yes, even from dan lol.

but all that said..? does this mean you agree that an n/a 3.6 pcar might have similar "numbers" vis a vis performance and hp/tq as might our turbo cars without boost?? or do you think it not possible. i am trying to understand.

my only experience with this might be limp mode, as how else can we drive this car without being able to boost? but no one "pushes" their car in "limp" mode lol. or i would hope not !
Old 03-28-2015, 05:52 PM
  #112  
dprantl
Race Car
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

A 996TT with turbos disabled would perform slightly worse than a NA 996 of the same displacement and engine design. The compression ratio of the TT is lower, and the turbos create an exhaust restriction. The intake will not be optimized for running NA, and ECU mapping will also not be optimal on the TT if the turbos are not doing anything. I think cdk's estimate of -10% HP/TQ is a pretty good one.

I have actually experienced this first-hand one time on a Saab 9000T with a T-25 turbo that lost its wastegate rod c-clip and the turbo suddenly did nothing.

Whether the power output of a NA 996 is enough for someone for street driving is completely subjective and depends on the individual. After driving a torque monster supercharged Porsche 928 daily for years (how about an instant 320lb.ft to the wheels @ 1,500RPM), it is a little disappointing. Nothing a turbo upgrade can't fix though...

Dan
Old 03-28-2015, 06:37 PM
  #113  
rmc1148
Drifting
 
rmc1148's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Lancaster Pa
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Is that an Audi tt just kidding but agree a NA motor because of compression would/should be the better performer. There is no replacement for displacement other then being force fed.
Old 03-28-2015, 07:18 PM
  #114  
"02996ttx50
Banned
 
"02996ttx50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,522
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dprantl
A 996TT with turbos disabled would perform slightly worse than a NA 996 of the same displacement and engine design. The compression ratio of the TT is lower, and the turbos create an exhaust restriction. The intake will not be optimized for running NA, and ECU mapping will also not be optimal on the TT if the turbos are not doing anything. I think cdk's estimate of -10% HP/TQ is a pretty good one.

I have actually experienced this first-hand one time on a Saab 9000T with a T-25 turbo that lost its wastegate rod c-clip and the turbo suddenly did nothing.

Whether the power output of a NA 996 is enough for someone for street driving is completely subjective and depends on the individual. After driving a torque monster supercharged Porsche 928 daily for years (how about an instant 320lb.ft to the wheels @ 1,500RPM), it is a little disappointing. Nothing a turbo upgrade can't fix though...

Dan
that makes complete sense to me, and would've been my "guess" that power level would be similar btw the two cars n/a vs unplugged lol turbo even if the n?a car was tuned or stock for a non boost situation

would not be enough for me. most ALL other cars are in limp mode for me now

thx for the clarification.
Old 03-30-2015, 12:03 PM
  #115  
Dock
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Dock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 12,131
Received 766 Likes on 543 Posts
Default

I talked to PCNA and they confirmed that a 996 Turbo engine without any boost available does not produce the same power numbers as a normally aspirated 996.
Old 03-30-2015, 02:25 PM
  #116  
autobonrun
Rennlist Member
 
autobonrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: kansas
Posts: 2,710
Received 404 Likes on 256 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dock
I talked to PCNA and they confirmed that a 996 Turbo engine without any boost available does not produce the same power numbers as a normally aspirated 996.
Thanks for following up.
Old 03-30-2015, 07:52 PM
  #117  
BryanCO
Drifting
 
BryanCO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 2,941
Received 208 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rmc1148
Is that an Audi tt just kidding but agree a NA motor because of compression would/should be the better performer. There is no replacement for displacement other then being force fed.
Compression as well as a bunch of other variables mentioned.

Really, apples and oranges...
Old 10-25-2016, 04:12 PM
  #118  
dprantl
Race Car
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dprantl
Show a pic of that 1.2 bar of boost at ~2,500RPM then

Dan
Originally Posted by "02996ttx50
i'll try to snap one when i run some decat vs catted kline exhaust vids. i'll keep you posted dan.

please stay breathless in anticipation until then.
Wow, it has been a long time trying to get that pic...

Dan
Old 10-29-2016, 01:21 PM
  #119  
Daytonaman
Advanced
 
Daytonaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

My 05' "S" coupled to a Tip with a Softronic Tune and an exhaust upgrade, pulled a ZR1 up to about 85.
The Tip allows the car to remain on 1.2 bar thru the power band @ WOT.
Never felt comfortable with power shifting a manual @ WOT. Seems like boost is lost @ shift points.
From a standstill, the low 1st brake torque puts 1.0 bar off the line, and 1st-2nd really slams..
Run what you brung...



Quick Reply: How much does the X50 option add?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:32 AM.