Notices
996 Turbo Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Awesome Cup Car Style Air Dam Group Buy.

Old 08-26-2013, 10:27 PM
  #16  
mikeeyee
1st Gear
 
mikeeyee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am in for one too. Not a lot of good options for tracked 996 turbos.
Old 08-27-2013, 12:14 AM
  #17  
sd996tt
Advanced
 
sd996tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Looks like this is going to be a very nice looking air dam. I'm in as well!

Justin
Old 09-02-2013, 02:01 PM
  #18  
Joe731
Racer
 
Joe731's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Half way there

Enrique, Can you update the list on the first page? It looks like we are up to five now? Half way there.
Old 09-02-2013, 04:06 PM
  #19  
jbossolo
Drifting
 
jbossolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The great Republic of Texas
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Count me in if it can be fitted to a "GT2 style" front.
Old 09-02-2013, 08:52 PM
  #20  
darth g-f
Instructor
 
darth g-f's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 217
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Th Dude
Forgive my ignorance. Without wind tunnel (or extensive road) testing, how can you be certain that the design will be a benefit (and not a detriment) to the aerodynamics?
Disclaimer* This is not my thread and I'm in no way affiliated with any of these guys.

Car aerodynamics is not as much as a black art as it used to be. Of course high end competition cars (DTM, F1, LMS) extensively use wind tunnel to improve their aero. However, they know how to make more downforce, they just are trying to make as much downforce as possible with the minimum drag possible within the confine of a rule book the size of phone book directory. So yes, extensive wind tunnel work is required.

For a street/track car with no rule book and no budget to test every part in a wind tunnel, there is a pretty simple recipe that will give great downforce.

1-Spoiler/splitter. You want as little air as possible going under the car. Especially on cars without totally flat bottom. You want the splitter low, so it splits the air and a minimum gets to go under the car. You also want it to protude so the air hitting the nose doesn't crawl under the car. This will reduce drag, improve downforce and even help with cooling as it helps air go through the radiators.

2-Canards. They help improve front downforce but with a rather deep drag cost. Not a big problem on our cars, but you need to keep that in mind when you decide to go that route. They can be stacked to increase DF. Some high end race cars use three levels of canards. This can be a bit tricky as they affect the rest of the air flow along the side and back of the car. For the street/track one canard on each side is enough. Low is usually better, they can be used in conjonction with splitter.

3-Diffuser. They help create downforce at the middle/rear of the car. It helps slowing the low pressure fast moving air from underneath the car get back with the slow moving air coming from the top of the car. A good diffuser can be really effective. However, there is very few diffuser available for the 911 that I know of. I don't think it's an area that's been focused on by the aftermarket so far.

4-Wings. They should be as large as possible and mounted as high (in the clean air) as possible. Real wing make real downforce, cute wing make barely more than nothing. Even the RS4.0 wing makes little downforce. End plates should be large enough to avoid splilling, the trailing edge thin as possible to lower drag. There's a bunch of other factors that affect how good a wing will be. There are whole books on the subject.

With all of this said, rule of thumb, if a splitter is stiff, long, low and protude over the nose of the car, it will make very good amount of downforce while cutting drag. They work. But now, if the splitter is big enough and works, one should start looking at a bigger more effective wing to balance the DF.

Another rule of thumb, DF balance front/rear should be about equal with static weight balance. That's the main problem with the big splitter. They are really effective, so the higher the speed, the more front downforce there is. At one point, it can unbalance the rear because it doesn't have as much DF. Our cars tend to understeer at high speed so it could just even things out. But could also be too much and make the car oversteer in high speed corners. People should be aware of that and make their choices accordingly.

I drove my previous car with a big splitter and no wing and it was really tail happy at speed 70mph and over, that was before I added the wing to be delivered. It was quite entertaining to say the least. With the wing, the car was planted and stucked to the road at speed.

So with all of that said, I'm convinced that the splitter works (assuming it is well built) but make sure there is some downforce at the back too...
Old 09-17-2013, 02:37 PM
  #21  
sd996tt
Advanced
 
sd996tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd really love to see this produced. I've recently been considering a GT-2 front conversion, and it is just way too expensive. A GT-2 conversion is at least $4000 with parts and labor (much more if OEM). If this splitter looks as good and works as good as expected, it would easily be worth much more than $500. I'll chip in a little extra myself just to get it rolling if need be!

This is such a nice option - I'm really hoping it happens.
I'll buy two if it helps! :-)

Justin

Last edited by sd996tt; 09-17-2013 at 02:43 PM. Reason: addition
Old 09-25-2013, 10:43 PM
  #22  
Joe731
Racer
 
Joe731's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default bump

Enrique,

are you still in? Adding up those interested. The first post in not inspiring, as it suggests only 1-2 people are interested, while the rest of the thread is getting us close. Can you update the first post with those interested?
Old 09-27-2013, 05:36 PM
  #23  
Joe Toth
Instructor
 
Joe Toth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Surrey, B.C.
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Hi guys,
I haven't heard from Enrique in a while and wondering if there is still interest. I recently completed a new piece for the 996 GT3
https://rennlist.com/forums/996-gt2-...-splitter.html

I am still interested in this project if you folks are.
I can be contacted directly at tei@telus.net

Joe
Old 10-01-2013, 11:44 AM
  #24  
z06801
Rennlist Member
 
z06801's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I would be in
Old 10-04-2013, 12:38 AM
  #25  
sd996tt
Advanced
 
sd996tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm still in. Beautiful work!

Justin
Old 10-06-2013, 08:17 PM
  #26  
Joe731
Racer
 
Joe731's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Let's do this!

I am updating the list as of 10/13/13

1.) F1crazydriver
2.) F1crazy driver (second)
3.) Heavychevy (1?)
4.) Mikeeyee (1)
5.) Joe731 (1)
6.) JBossolo (will it fit GT2 style bumper?)
7.) Cincysota (wants to see design)
8.) SD996TT
9.) SD996TT (second)
10.) Bill996
By my count of all of the above are still in, I think we hit the previously discussed magic number of 10.

Can those on this list please confirm whether they are still interested and if so, interested in how many. If we have at least 10 interested, I am happy to talk with Joe Toth and see if he can share a prototype design before we put our money down. If it looks anything like the Cayman one in the picture, I am in for sure, maybe even two.

Last edited by Joe731; 10-12-2013 at 07:25 PM.
Old 10-06-2013, 09:44 PM
  #27  
32krazy!
Drifting
 
32krazy!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

must just be me but the splitter setup you have in another thread doesnt look anything like the first picture shown. i was interested in something like that but the 2 piece looks to much like a homemade product so ill have to pass
Old 10-06-2013, 10:37 PM
  #28  
GermanCarSpecialists
Former Vendor
 
GermanCarSpecialists's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I am interested in the canards only, can I get it? If yes, update me
Old 10-07-2013, 12:07 AM
  #29  
sd996tt
Advanced
 
sd996tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm still in. I think the two-piece is just an added option for the track.

Justin
Old 10-07-2013, 01:00 AM
  #30  
Kevinmacd
Rennlist Member
 
Kevinmacd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SE Florida
Posts: 2,740
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Problem is if not designed correctly whether its a splitter, diffusser, or rear wing, the more you put in the path of moving air the more drag you get. There has to be a median a designer needs to shoot for.So a large wing or spliter may not be the overall answer!

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Awesome Cup Car Style Air Dam Group Buy.



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:01 PM.