CA Smog - Cat Not Ready
#16
Racer
Pulling my hair out right now with this issue on my 2004 GT3. Car always passed smog with flying colors before this new ******* stupid OBD ll monitor test! What a joke changing the rules on a car that's 12 years old!! I've done the drive cycles, checked the monitors with my durametric, and STILL can't get the catalyst monitor ready. NO CEL, no running issues, no nothing! Someone help before I set this thing on fire on the steps of the capital building!!!
#17
Pulling my hair out right now with this issue on my 2004 GT3. Car always passed smog with flying colors before this new ******* stupid OBD ll monitor test! What a joke changing the rules on a car that's 12 years old!! I've done the drive cycles, checked the monitors with my durametric, and STILL can't get the catalyst monitor ready. NO CEL, no running issues, no nothing! Someone help before I set this thing on fire on the steps of the capital building!!!
#18
Three Wheelin'
Pulling my hair out right now with this issue on my 2004 GT3. Car always passed smog with flying colors before this new ******* stupid OBD ll monitor test! What a joke changing the rules on a car that's 12 years old!! I've done the drive cycles, checked the monitors with my durametric, and STILL can't get the catalyst monitor ready. NO CEL, no running issues, no nothing! Someone help before I set this thing on fire on the steps of the capital building!!!
Next time I will find/pay a place to "make it" pass, even with race exhaust on.
Good luck.
#19
I pretty much drive the car on weekends and took almost a year to get this cleared up. Kept the paperwork in the car showing the registration fees were paid, incase I got pulled over.
Did the drive cycles above without success either, checking with a scanner every time after a drive.
What worked for me was to start up the car and let it idle for 20 minutes after sitting over night, which I did once. Then driving at a constant speed on the street for a bit and on the freeway a few times during the week and my "normal driving". Not sure about exceeding 3000RPM came into play or not.
Got the "Monitors Ready" in less than a week.
Hope this helps.
Did the drive cycles above without success either, checking with a scanner every time after a drive.
What worked for me was to start up the car and let it idle for 20 minutes after sitting over night, which I did once. Then driving at a constant speed on the street for a bit and on the freeway a few times during the week and my "normal driving". Not sure about exceeding 3000RPM came into play or not.
Got the "Monitors Ready" in less than a week.
Hope this helps.
Last edited by 996TWINS; 09-28-2016 at 07:39 PM.
#21
In my situation my aftermarket cats weren't working efficiently enough to allow the ready state, even though they were working well enough that a CEL wasn't being triggered. It was kind of an in-between state.
I chose to install O2 sensor extenders, after which the Short Test ran successfully and the computer immediately showed ready. I haven't had a problem since.
Mike
#22
Rennlist Member
FWIW, at least on my997 the short test would not set 2 of the 7 or so indicators to ready. those had to complete over time.
#24
Racer
Forcing people to drive around aimlessly on expired tags trying to get "monitors to set" is ABSOLUTE BS.
#25
Racer
Mike, I honestly had no idea they existed. I looked them up and find it hilarious that someone thought of a small threaded pipe to move the downstream O2 sensors further from the exhaust flow, thereby fooling the computer into thinking the cats were more effective. Genius.....and a pretty severe indictment of the technology we're dealing with here.....
My question is.....what is this "nether world" we're in where the catalyst is potentially effective enough to NOT fire a CEL, but NOT effective enough to allow the catalyst monitor to reset? I mean, that is the real joke here.....talk about a recipe for having to throw parts at a car and pray they fix it.....pretty bad considering the cost of our O2 sensors and catalysts!
My question is.....what is this "nether world" we're in where the catalyst is potentially effective enough to NOT fire a CEL, but NOT effective enough to allow the catalyst monitor to reset? I mean, that is the real joke here.....talk about a recipe for having to throw parts at a car and pray they fix it.....pretty bad considering the cost of our O2 sensors and catalysts!
#26
Mike, I honestly had no idea they existed. I looked them up and find it hilarious that someone thought of a small threaded pipe to move the downstream O2 sensors further from the exhaust flow, thereby fooling the computer into thinking the cats were more effective. Genius.....and a pretty severe indictment of the technology we're dealing with here.....
My question is.....what is this "nether world" we're in where the catalyst is potentially effective enough to NOT fire a CEL, but NOT effective enough to allow the catalyst monitor to reset? I mean, that is the real joke here.....talk about a recipe for having to throw parts at a car and pray they fix it.....pretty bad considering the cost of our O2 sensors and catalysts!
My question is.....what is this "nether world" we're in where the catalyst is potentially effective enough to NOT fire a CEL, but NOT effective enough to allow the catalyst monitor to reset? I mean, that is the real joke here.....talk about a recipe for having to throw parts at a car and pray they fix it.....pretty bad considering the cost of our O2 sensors and catalysts!
#27
Don't know where you are but if possible, take it to Walter in Riverside. I had a dead battery the morning i was going to get a smog check few years ago and they told me I needed something flash/reset before hand and it was $100-200 i think. So that and a new battery was an expensive smog check but i rather pay someone that knows what they are doing.
#28
Stuttgart1 - Thanks for the post stating how to drive to turn it on (get to ready state). My catalytic converter would not turn on either. My mechanic pointed me to you post.
Skeptically I tried it, and it worked!
Skeptically I tried it, and it worked!
Last edited by bb911-02; 02-01-2017 at 08:36 PM. Reason: Spelling/diction
#29
Rennlist Member
#30
Advanced
The fuel level also needs to be between one half and three quarters full.This will cause some monitors to fail.The system uses fuel vapors to test several monitors so if the fuel is to low or high it will not be able to test or pass some monitors.