Notices
996 GT2/GT3 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Coolant Pipe Failure & PCA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-10-2012, 08:25 AM
  #1  
Exigent
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
Exigent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Coolant Pipe Failure & PCA

Our region has a DE in April. As part of the tech inspection a notice was sent out for all 996 cars requiring use of Water Wetter, or similar, due to known issue of "catastrophic coolant system failures when tracked". It goes on to say if the coolant pipe behind the power steering pump has been welded the car will be in compliance.

Haven't had my '05 GT3 pipes welded yet but was planning on Water Wetter at least so I'm glad to see it. Curious if other regions are doing this?
Old 02-10-2012, 08:47 AM
  #2  
kk2
Rennlist Member
 
kk2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 1,663
Received 31 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Kind of ridiculous they'd take the steps to implement that, but only include 996s.
Old 02-10-2012, 08:52 AM
  #3  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Personally I think this is overreaction and an irrational response by the region. The number of coolant system failures documented is very small compared to the number of cars. I have been tracking for years and run with countless GT1 based cars and NEVER seen a system fail.

This is a DE, not a race. That is an expense that you cannot require the participants to undertake because of something read on the internet and is not even recognized by PCNA. What about other marques of cars? What about other models in the Porsche lineup that has their own potential malady?

And lastly, there is virtually ZERO difference in the level of traction on the track when several liters of coolant, water wetter, or straight water is dumped en masse. If a car in front of you dumps its load of water (zero coolant and zero water wetter) you are still going for a ride.
Old 02-10-2012, 09:44 AM
  #4  
KOAN
Rennlist Member
 
KOAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 2,794
Received 159 Likes on 110 Posts
Default

Dell is correct about the friction coefficient between these fluids. The difference is that water will evaporate pretty quickly, where as coolant will have to be cleaned up. AFAIK, few other failures in other P-cars will cause potential hazard to other cars to the extent that a coolant dump will. The failure seems to be age related, or more likely, heat cycle related. If this is the case, the frequency of this failure should increase as more cars reach this threshold.
I'm glad I had mine fixed. As it was disassembled, we found 2 lines were very loose.
Old 02-10-2012, 09:47 AM
  #5  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Good point Chuck. So really, this is a track cleanup of coolant issue. Something they could do while they are towing in the car that blew a line(s)
Old 02-10-2012, 09:54 AM
  #6  
AudiOn19s
Race Car
 
AudiOn19s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 4,511
Received 46 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LVDell
Good point Chuck. So really, this is a track cleanup issue
and probably to minimize liability. OVR's incident with coolant dump in a bad place wound up in 4 cars being pretty heavily damaged including one Rennlister's car.

I still thank my lucky stars that when I had my failure it did not results in damage to anyone else's car.
Old 02-10-2012, 09:56 AM
  #7  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AudiOn19s
and probably to minimize liability. OVR's incident with coolant dump in a bad place wound up in 4 cars being pretty heavily damaged including one Rennlister's car.

I still thank my lucky stars that when I had my failure it did not results in damage to anyone else's car.
How would they minimize liability?

The odds that damage would have been reduced through the use of water wetter is small.
Old 02-10-2012, 10:06 AM
  #8  
AudiOn19s
Race Car
 
AudiOn19s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 4,511
Received 46 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LVDell
How would they minimize liability?

The odds that damage would have been reduced through the use of water wetter is small.
Good point.

It's somewhat humerous that the one fitting they focus on for their technical inspection doesn't even exist in the 997 cars
Old 02-10-2012, 10:07 AM
  #9  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

I just saw that. I found that comical as well. So not only are they fabricating a "SAFETY RECALL", they are also diagnosing what they feel is the best diagnosis.
Old 02-10-2012, 10:49 AM
  #10  
452gt3
Rennlist Member
 
452gt3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

I had two fittings fail the first one was at CALSpeedway and lucky for us it was as my wife was just entering the track and not in turn one at high speed. The dealer fixed that one, my mistake they replaced that one. The next one failed at another TT at Buttionwillow mid session while I was driving and two cars behind me went off again lucky they did not have contact. I made the desission after that I would not put my car on track again until I properly corrected the problem, in my case that was welding the fittings. No other related problems since but I try not to stay behind others that have not resolved the issue. I hope this is not as big of an issue as it may seem but I did not feel it was worth the risk for me or others around me.
Old 02-10-2012, 11:00 AM
  #11  
multi21
On temporary vacation
 
multi21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 15,957
Received 2,895 Likes on 1,719 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LVDell
Personally I think this is overreaction and an irrational response by the region. The number of coolant system failures documented is very small compared to the number of cars. I have been tracking for years and run with countless GT1 based cars and NEVER seen a system fail.

This is a DE, not a race. That is an expense that you cannot require the participants to undertake because of something read on the internet and is not even recognized by PCNA. What about other marques of cars? What about other models in the Porsche lineup that has their own potential malady?

And lastly, there is virtually ZERO difference in the level of traction on the track when several liters of coolant, water wetter, or straight water is dumped en masse. If a car in front of you dumps its load of water (zero coolant and zero water wetter) you are still going for a ride.
This is spot on. Overraction is my first thought and second, the language of "welded" is not correct in my opinion. If you read the Sharkwerks thread on this issue, they do not weld their fittings and have had zero issues. In addition, they have had cars come in that have had the weld and found pinholes in the weld spots resulting in leakage. Moral of the story is if you're going to have a weld done, have it done by someone who knows what their doing. To exclude an entire class of car without a weld seems like improper policy.
Old 02-10-2012, 11:33 AM
  #12  
himself
Rennlist Member
 
himself's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,736
Received 37 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

I agree that the region is going overboard. But it's not that difficult to switch to water/wetter to comply. Although the welding solution proposed for a DE is pretty ree-diculous. Especially if your car is still under some type of warranty.

As for coolant, it does take a lot longer to clean up. And it actually takes cleaning. Cars drag coolant along the track extending the "spill" area. It might take an hour or more to clean a coolant spill. But you can just toss a debris flag for water. The cars dragging the water actually speed up the drying process. Also, coolant on your tires doesn't evaporate as quickly as water potentislly making the "danger zone" longer.

-td
Old 02-10-2012, 12:50 PM
  #13  
Alan C.
Rennlist Member
 
Alan C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 9,407
Received 988 Likes on 511 Posts
Default

I believe choosing to do something is better than sitting back and doing nothing. I'm sure OVR's policy will undergo a few modifications. I haven't seen the OVR requirements in writing so I can't comment of the OP's post.

I've probably been running events as long as Dell, 22 years, and I'm glad he hasn't experienced the topic of this thread. In my case I was one of the cars on the receiving end of the GT3 leak. There were 2 other occurrences at Mid-Ohio last year. I've advocated water wetter for several years. It is friendlier to the track and can get the session underway quicker after a spill. The difference in friction between a track wetted with glycol/water and water/water wetter is not that great. The cars I ran in club racing had water wetter in them.

About the bad welds. I would find a good shop to TIG the parts just as I would find a shop that would use the correct drill size for the tap used. I's also want to be sure that the tech didn't strip the threads. Everything has its own set of issues.

Dell if you become a data point let us know how you feel about it. And the last time I looked the wall didn't care if it was a race or DE.
Old 02-10-2012, 04:31 PM
  #14  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan C.
Dell if you become a data point let us know how you feel about it. And the last time I looked the wall didn't care if it was a race or DE.
Classless post.
Old 02-10-2012, 04:50 PM
  #15  
996FLT6
Rennlist Member
 
996FLT6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: san francisco
Posts: 13,978
Received 235 Likes on 191 Posts
Default

I'm glad I replaced the coolant with waterwetter prior to the trackweekend where it blew with a vengence.My friend with a 997.1 gt3 saw me sidelined at edge of track. He didn't even know I blew a coolant fitting plus all the other cars that wizzed on by. I laid a strip almost half mile long. Mike


Quick Reply: Coolant Pipe Failure & PCA



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:59 PM.