Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Has YOUR car suffered an IMS failure
Yes, the IMS failed
8.67%
No issues with IMS
91.33%
Voters: 1591. You may not vote on this poll

IMS bearing failure for your 996, Y or N? tell us (yr, 996 Mk1 or MK2 failure mode)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-2013, 10:19 PM
  #61  
targa996
Pro
 
targa996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

2002 w 61k ... Rms seal replaced at 30k due to leak. Bearing so far ok
Old 02-09-2013, 03:27 AM
  #62  
Nineellebin
Track Day
 
Nineellebin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

99 C2. 84k mls. XX0083 . Original bearing. No leaks. Lifters ticking thou.
Old 02-09-2013, 09:44 AM
  #63  
osteoman
Instructor
 
osteoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 104
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

MY 2000 C2 w 71k miles. All original parts and no problems.
Old 02-09-2013, 11:42 AM
  #64  
ZX9RCAM
Nordschleife Master
 
ZX9RCAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Spring, Texas (The Woodlands)
Posts: 5,147
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nineellebin
99 C2. 84k mls. XX0083 . Original bearing. No leaks. Lifters ticking thou.
Just at start-up, or all the time?
Old 02-09-2013, 12:24 PM
  #65  
alpine003
Banned
 
alpine003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,697
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

2001 with 120k miles so not sure if single or dual row. Engine serial indicates single but going by serial isn't 100% accurate. Original IMS but had RMS updated to newer version and had IMS flange replaced. So far so good...
Old 02-09-2013, 01:08 PM
  #66  
JMLavoie
Racer
 
JMLavoie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Vancouver Island, BC
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by babylonboots
2001, Dual row IMSB, but preemptively replaced with LN ceramic at 49,500 miles.

Original motor, not a replacement.
Babylonboots;
It is very interesting that you have a dual row IMSB on a 2001. Should we infer then that all 2000s like mine have dual-rows and that the switch to single-rows took place sometimes in 2001 vs 2000?
To say the least, I'm perplexed!
Martin
Old 02-09-2013, 01:16 PM
  #67  
kbollaert
Rennlist Member
 
kbollaert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: brandon, ms
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Pulled out @ 120k miles due to teardown. Bearing in good shape.
Old 02-09-2013, 01:16 PM
  #68  
ivangene
Parts Specialist
Rennlist Member
 
ivangene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 16,326
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JMLavoie
I'm perplexed!
you and a lot of mechanics - this snot supposed to be a discussion so let's not here...you can start a thread if you like though
Old 02-09-2013, 01:18 PM
  #69  
alpine003
Banned
 
alpine003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,697
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JMLavoie
Babylonboots;
It is very interesting that you have a dual row IMSB on a 2001. Should we infer then that all 2000s like mine have dual-rows and that the switch to single-rows took place sometimes in 2001 vs 2000?
To say the least, I'm perplexed!
Martin
2001 was the transition year, not 2000 for single row IMS.
Old 02-09-2013, 01:40 PM
  #70  
JMLavoie
Racer
 
JMLavoie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Vancouver Island, BC
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

I stand 'cautioned' your Honour, Evangene!
Alpine: Realized after I sent my post that you were in the same 01 boat as Babylon. You might be right ... or Porsche was simply getting rid of their dual-row stocks in both yrs, 00 & 01. We will likely never know for sure.
Old 02-09-2013, 05:25 PM
  #71  
flatlander
Track Day
 
flatlander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Kansas City region
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

'04 MkII had rms drip, so replaced IMS bearing pro-active @ 48K
Old 02-09-2013, 06:58 PM
  #72  
wisky
Rennlist Member
 
wisky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Ridgewood New Jersey
Posts: 655
Received 87 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

2003 4S, purchased the car with 90k miles, had the IMS bearing replaced with the LN Engineering kit for peace of mind. The original bearing was in good shape and probably would not have failed. It is now my most prized paperweight.
Old 02-09-2013, 09:38 PM
  #73  
Meares
Racer
 
Meares's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pinehurst NC
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

03 coupe 109,500 miles.....got my car back today! the bearing had VERY VERY little play (probably the same as when it was new) NO damage to the bearing's seals...no nothing at all on the bearing!!! the RMS was leaking just slightly...new clutch and DAMN is there a difference!! SO much easier to acuate! NOT grainy anymore! i also have a prized paperweight!
Old 02-09-2013, 10:13 PM
  #74  
Nineellebin
Track Day
 
Nineellebin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ticking slightly in the beginning. When warmed to 180, its constant. Irritating the least. Ill get it fixed... Now how many people have lifter noise ? Hmm... I do the ""procedure's" just to make sure. Or "The solution" for Dual rows if they offered it..

Last edited by Nineellebin; 02-10-2013 at 06:17 AM.
Old 02-11-2013, 07:56 PM
  #75  
trapperdog
Instructor
 
trapperdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

MY '99 (May 1998 build date), 33k miles, original motor, original IMS/RMS, bone dry. Runs great. (knocking on wood as I type this)


Quick Reply: IMS bearing failure for your 996, Y or N? tell us (yr, 996 Mk1 or MK2 failure mode)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:54 AM.