993 GT2 alignment specifications?
#1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
993 GT2 alignment specifications?
Does anyone have the factory alignment specifications for the road version GT2? I am curious what camber numbers these 2WD cars used.
#2
Three Wheelin'
I'm assuming the alignment wasn't that far off of the RS specs since they shared the same suspension components for the most part. Do some searching on the 993 forum for the RS alignment specs and you will find what you need.
Your alignment will depend entirely on how you are using the car (street/track) and what kind of tires your running etc. Many variables there
Your alignment will depend entirely on how you are using the car (street/track) and what kind of tires your running etc. Many variables there
#3
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
#5
Drifting
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Westlake Village CA.
Posts: 2,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#7
Banned
Trending Topics
#8
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
I thought this info would be easy to find. I guess not
The 993 RS specs are still very mild at just over 1deg of negative camber. I am sure that most RS owners who spend much time on the track dial in more camber.
I am curious what Porsche did with the street GT2 since it has way more power (torque) than the RS, more weight and a larger front to rear tire stagger. It is difficult to believe that they used the same alignment specs.
The GT2 race car specs listed above are very radical and only apply to a full-on track car running non-DOT slicks.
The 993 RS specs are still very mild at just over 1deg of negative camber. I am sure that most RS owners who spend much time on the track dial in more camber.
I am curious what Porsche did with the street GT2 since it has way more power (torque) than the RS, more weight and a larger front to rear tire stagger. It is difficult to believe that they used the same alignment specs.
The GT2 race car specs listed above are very radical and only apply to a full-on track car running non-DOT slicks.
Last edited by Tuner1; 08-20-2009 at 12:22 AM. Reason: 1
#9
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Tuner1
The racing settings given here for the EVO are not to be used for your car. Not because they are radical, but they simply do not apply at all to a street car because of tire construction and sidewall height, car height, car weight, downforce, suspension and springs, etc, etc... You cannot achieve these height settings with your suspension most likely, and these are for slick tires, notice how each brand needs different setups, imagine how different the optimal setup can be for a totally different tire construction such as DOTs!
For a dual purpose 2WD, GT2 like weight or a bit more, on DOT Semi-slicks, what I tested and works very well and very fast on the track was -2.3 Front, -2.1 rear (also used -2.0 and -2.0 with very good results), Toe close to zero in the front, Castor and height per stock RS specs. Kinematic Toe adjustment is crucial. This was very confortable on the street as well, except some tramlining/nervousness, but I have 265s in the front.
You can get 100s of different opinions, use a GPS datalogger and do some laps and test a bit. There is no right or wrong setting, just how comfortable you are with it and your driving style.
The racing settings given here for the EVO are not to be used for your car. Not because they are radical, but they simply do not apply at all to a street car because of tire construction and sidewall height, car height, car weight, downforce, suspension and springs, etc, etc... You cannot achieve these height settings with your suspension most likely, and these are for slick tires, notice how each brand needs different setups, imagine how different the optimal setup can be for a totally different tire construction such as DOTs!
For a dual purpose 2WD, GT2 like weight or a bit more, on DOT Semi-slicks, what I tested and works very well and very fast on the track was -2.3 Front, -2.1 rear (also used -2.0 and -2.0 with very good results), Toe close to zero in the front, Castor and height per stock RS specs. Kinematic Toe adjustment is crucial. This was very confortable on the street as well, except some tramlining/nervousness, but I have 265s in the front.
You can get 100s of different opinions, use a GPS datalogger and do some laps and test a bit. There is no right or wrong setting, just how comfortable you are with it and your driving style.
#10
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
The racing settings given here for the EVO are not to be used for your car. Not because they are radical, but they simply do not apply at all to a street car because of tire construction and sidewall height, car height, car weight, downforce, suspension and springs, etc, etc...
For a dual purpose 2WD, GT2 like weight or a bit more, on DOT Semi-slicks, what I tested and works very well and very fast on the track was -2.3 Front, -2.1 rear (also used -2.0 and -2.0 with very good results), Toe close to zero in the front, Castor and height per stock RS specs.
It would still be nice to see what the factory set the street GT2 at.