Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998

Loose front end

Old 10-04-2016, 08:03 PM
  #46  
Tlaloc75
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Tlaloc75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,983
Received 147 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OverBoosted28
Also remember, factory alignment settings, are not necessarily the best for handling. They're meant to encompass the broadest amount of drivers, with the least amount of surprises (which also, may mean numb response), and reduce tire wear. Determine what your driving level is, use for car, and what you deem as acceptable tire wear (rear). Get all original rubber replaced, then get it set up, and go enjoy.
I like this - it'll be my new mantra.
Old 10-05-2016, 10:07 PM
  #47  
Tlaloc75
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Tlaloc75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,983
Received 147 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

BillV thank you for your tire pressure recommendation. I've tried many different pressure combos trying to find what works best and your suggestion of 33/35 felt the best.
Old 10-10-2016, 09:03 PM
  #48  
Tlaloc75
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Tlaloc75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,983
Received 147 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Update: I replaced the front control arm ball joints today and also retightened each of the control arm bushing bolts with suspension at normal location (not drooped).

Result: The issue is fixed! Car drives great and the front end feels really solid. The old ball joints looked fine. The boots were intact, they felt fine and I couldn't detect any play in them by manually moving them. But... it appears they were worn out and at normal suspension loads they must have had a little play.

Moral of the story: When replacing the control arm bushings, do the balljoints at the same time. They are a wear item, like the bushings, and it isn't obvious when they are worn out.

I'm still planning on replacing the rack bushings and lowering the front end slightly, so I'll report back on that and let everyone know if it makes any additional difference.
Old 10-11-2016, 02:03 PM
  #49  
jdistefa
Rennlist Member
 
jdistefa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Onterrible
Posts: 7,898
Received 447 Likes on 243 Posts
Default

Nice!
Old 10-16-2016, 08:06 PM
  #50  
Tlaloc75
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Tlaloc75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,983
Received 147 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

I lowered front end 15mm today and replaced the steering rack bushings with poly. I can feel some differences, but I think a lot of it is increased camber from lowering. I'm getting an alignment on Tuesday to bring everything back into spec and will report back.

Lowering the car took over 4 hours, lots of trial and error to get it right. Rack bushings were pretty easy, less than hour to replace.

Ride height is now:
- FL: 135mm
- FR: 134mm
- Rl: 128mm
- RR: 127mm
Old 10-16-2016, 08:33 PM
  #51  
Tlaloc75
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Tlaloc75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,983
Received 147 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Question for the experts. Does the ride height I set, look OK? Is it high enough to avoid bump steer?
Old 10-16-2016, 10:41 PM
  #52  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,237
Received 502 Likes on 345 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tlaloc75
Question for the experts. Does the ride height I set, look OK? Is it high enough to avoid bump steer?
Bump steer is never eliminated, it can only be minimized

Ride height is now:
- FL: 135mm
- FR: 134mm
- Rl: 128mm
- RR: 127mm
You appear to have a lot of rake
the front is at the low end of RoW M030 which is also the high end of RS, so right on the edge of wanting RS wheel carrier and outer tie rods, if keeping the wheel carriers stock I'd raise the front to ~140mm maybe a bit higher and probably leave the rear alone
you rear is right at RoW M030 spec if it matched the front it would be ~117mm
Old 10-16-2016, 11:02 PM
  #53  
Tlaloc75
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Tlaloc75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,983
Received 147 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

I measured with a digital level on the door sill and it was at -.2, so not much rake. Not sure why, should I be showing more?

I'll raise it to 140mm tomorrow, so it'll be 10mm lower than what I had originally.
Old 10-17-2016, 02:47 PM
  #54  
Tlaloc75
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Tlaloc75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,983
Received 147 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

I got it to 140/141 so I think i'm in a better height range now. Is it normal for:
1) Heights to be slightly different side to side?
2) Spring perches to be slightly different as well?

For instance my right side is lower at 140 vs 141 on the left but I had to raise the spring perch on the right side a bit higher than on the left to get to this measurement. When they were equal (measured threads with a tape measure), the right side was 3mm lower than left.
Old 10-17-2016, 02:55 PM
  #55  
il pirata
Banned
 
il pirata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: colorado canyons
Posts: 4,078
Received 166 Likes on 104 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tlaloc75
Is it normal for:
1) Heights to be slightly different side to side?
If the car is corner balanced correctly the left side of the car will be slightly higher without the driver, assuming LHD.
Old 10-17-2016, 03:09 PM
  #56  
Tlaloc75
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Tlaloc75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,983
Received 147 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

That probably explains it. The left side was a little higher to start since it was corner balanced in the past. Since I didn't change anything in the rear, it would want to be a little higher on the left front as a result.
Old 10-17-2016, 03:42 PM
  #57  
pp000830
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
pp000830's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 9,589
Received 1,441 Likes on 1,015 Posts
Default

Start with the basics:

Don't assume your alignment is good. Recheck the rear toe. if it is out your car will seem to wonder at highway speeds. Even if the adjustment was correctly set it may have slipped if not properly tightened down.
Old 10-17-2016, 06:29 PM
  #58  
Tlaloc75
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Tlaloc75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,983
Received 147 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

I had an alignment done two weeks ago (described earlier in the thread). I'm going in for another one tomorrow after the front end work I did this weekend.

Issue was resolved by replacing the ball joints. I went ahead with the rack bushings and the front end lowering because they seemed like a good idea and I like the idea of making the car drive even better.

First impression after the rack bushings and the lowering is that its a nice improvement. Steering feels even more direct and the front end feels more planted. Until I get the alignment I don't know for sure though, some of the difference I'm feeling is probably due to increased camber in the front end from lowering the car.
Old 10-18-2016, 05:43 PM
  #59  
Tlaloc75
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Tlaloc75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,983
Received 147 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

I got the alignment done today and hit my favorite twisty roads. Front end is totally locked down now and the issue is completely, 100% gone.

I made a bunch of changes in the course of this thread and was able to test drive before and after each, so as a recap here's what I did in descending order from what made the most difference to what made the least:
1) Front control arm bushings. I changed from worn out stock to new ER sport. Huge difference in steering feel and got rid of the intermittent shaking/wobbling i could feel through the wheel.
2) Ball joints. They didn't feel worn out when I inspected them by hand, but it turns out they were. Replacing these with new units removed the slight hunting back and forth that I was noticing at highway speeds.
3) Tarret solid inner tie rod + stock outer tie rod. I don't think mine were very worn, so the originals weren't causing problems but the change from stock to solid resulted in a very nice improvement in steering feel. Suddenly the road feel was alive.
4) Lowering the front end from ~150mm to ~140mm. Made the front end feel slightly more alive and got rid of the numb feeling I was getting in certain corners and at higher speeds.
5) Steering rack bushings. I replaced the originals, which seemed pretty soft, with the blue poly bushings available on eBay. I think I noticed a difference but if so, it was not very pronounced. Nice to have them in and it was a cheap/easy change, so I don't see any downside. I accidentally ordered 4 short bolts so had to reuse the long bolts and will replace those once the replacements arrive. So if you are going to do it, be sure you get 2 of the 60mm and 2 of the 80mm bolts.

Every change did result in an improvement and while it was a lot of work it was worth it. Put all the changes together and the steering now feels telepathic and every bit as good as I remember from the manual rack on my old RS America. If anything it might be a little better since the front end has more bite and the power assist makes driving easier.

Thanks to everyone that helped me out and I hope this thread will be helpful to others as well.

Now I'm ready to tackle my rear suspension!

Last edited by Tlaloc75; 10-19-2016 at 12:36 AM.
Old 10-18-2016, 05:48 PM
  #60  
Tlaloc75
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Tlaloc75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,983
Received 147 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

As an additional note, here are my final alignment settings.

Camber:
- FL: -.4
- FR: -.8
- RL: -1.1
- RR: -1.4

Caster:
- FL: -5.6
- FR: -5.8

Toe:
- FL: 1/16
- FR: 1/16
- RL: 1/16
- RR: 1/8

Cross Camber:
- Front: .4
- Rear: .3

Cross Caster:
- Front: -.2

Total Toe:
- Front: 1/8
- Rear: 3/16

Thrust Angle: -.08

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Loose front end



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:58 PM.