Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998

Failed CA Smog Hi NOX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-20-2016, 04:23 PM
  #1  
Vorsicht
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Vorsicht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,139
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
Default Failed CA Smog Hi NOX

Just failed CA smog due to High NOX (double the max values). I was getting an intermittent 1124 code (short/ground) on the O2 sensor before the test, could that affect NOX values? I have replaced the o2 sensor but was wondering if anything else should be checked b4 I bring it back in for re-test.

In reading up on NOX values EGR comes up a lot. Is there a way to test this valve? Do we even have one on our cars?

Thanks


PS all other values passed (HC, CO, etc..)
Old 09-20-2016, 05:04 PM
  #2  
windydog
Pro
 
windydog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Post your results,due to high cylinder temps
Old 09-20-2016, 05:15 PM
  #3  
Vorsicht
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Vorsicht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,139
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Here are the results:


Old 09-20-2016, 05:20 PM
  #4  
Vorsicht
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Vorsicht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,139
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

I just discovered something new. Just aft of the o2 sensor there is a threaded hole on the Cat. I believe this is there to secure the cage that protects the o2 sensor. This cage has been missing for a while. This hole is letting O2 enter the cat right in the vicinity of the sensor. I'm guessing that added oxygen at the 02 sensor would cause a lean mixture and hence the hig Cyl. Temps & high NOX.

Anyone concur?

I have plugged the hole with a screw.
Old 09-20-2016, 06:18 PM
  #5  
pp000830
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
pp000830's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 9,596
Received 1,447 Likes on 1,019 Posts
Default

Seems you found something significant from what should be expected, a hole in your exhaust. Do you pay for retesting or are there a limit in the number of tests you can take the test, if not just plug the hole and take it back and see what happens.
Old 09-20-2016, 06:31 PM
  #6  
helmet993
Racer
 
helmet993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Laguna Beach, CA
Posts: 378
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

When they tested your car did they set a fan in the front right to keep air moving across the oil cooler? That single fan alone significantly impacts my NOx when smog testing. I have played with that on the 5 gas analyzer as well.

Since you have a 95 maybe you found part of the concern with that missing screw though...an exhaust leak can cause high NOx depending on where the leak is in relation to your cat and o2 sensor.
Old 09-20-2016, 06:35 PM
  #7  
Vorsicht
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Vorsicht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,139
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

$30 for a retest within 30 days. I don't believe there is a maximum no. of tests but this is CA! so I'd like to pass on the next go-round.

Originally Posted by pp000830
Seems you found something significant from what should be expected, a hole in your exhaust. Do you pay for retesting or are there a limit in the number of tests you can take the test, if not just plug the hole and take it back and see what happens.
Old 09-20-2016, 06:39 PM
  #8  
Vorsicht
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Vorsicht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,139
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Yes, and the hole is just an inch or two away from the O2 sensor. No fan. Maybe I will set it to high for the re-test.

Originally Posted by helmet993
When they tested your car did they set a fan in the front right to keep air moving across the oil cooler? That single fan alone significantly impacts my NOx when smog testing. I have played with that on the 5 gas analyzer as well.

Since you have a 95 maybe you found part of the concern with that missing screw though...an exhaust leak can cause high NOx depending on where the leak is in relation to your cat and o2 sensor.
Old 09-20-2016, 07:09 PM
  #9  
nine9six
Banned
 
nine9six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,465
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Peter,
I believe you to be correct in your discovery analysis. I'd fix it, get things good and hot for a while, and go for a retest.

If previous test results (did you keep prior results) are well within range, you've hit the nail on the head. Most likely you lost the plug between then and now.

BTW, 95 or later model? 2 or 4 O2 sensors?
EDIT
Looks 95 from your Part Number Help, post.

http://www.pcarworkshop.com/images/d...4_-_p1126_.pdf

Check out No 1 trouble area to check.

Last edited by nine9six; 09-20-2016 at 07:41 PM.
Old 09-20-2016, 07:56 PM
  #10  
Vorsicht
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Vorsicht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,139
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nine9six
Peter,

If previous test results (did you keep prior results) are well within range, you've hit the nail on the head. Most likely you lost the plug between then and now.

http://www.pcarworkshop.com/images/d...4_-_p1126_.pdf

Check out No 1 trouble area to check.
Yes, two years ago I passed no problem. Nox was well under the limit.

I'll report back after re-test.
Old 09-20-2016, 08:25 PM
  #11  
OverBoosted28
Rennlist Member
 
OverBoosted28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Central California
Posts: 3,484
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Worst part of this whole "smog inspection" debacle? It has little/to no effect on harmful pollutants. Probably, the last 3 decades of reductions, were wiped out during this year's fires. Sorry, just hate the crap this state forces on law abiding citizens, that has no real positive outcome.
Old 09-20-2016, 09:18 PM
  #12  
goofballdeluxe
Rennlist Member
 
goofballdeluxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,942
Likes: 0
Received 150 Likes on 97 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OverBoosted28
Probably, the last 3 decades of reductions, were wiped out during this year's fires. Sorry, just hate the crap this state forces on law abiding citizens, that has no real positive outcome.
Well, I lived in Los Angeles in the 1970s, and the air was foul. Far worse than it is today. Smog checks are a big reason why the air is better now. So there has been a real positive outcome having smog controls here.

We can't control every forest fire. We can control, to a great extent, how many pollutants are emitted into the air we breathe by the emissions regulations. Forest fires may wipe the gains out, but imagine if we had no emissions controls AND forest fires.

Yes, they're a pain in the ***, but we're better off with smog checks, if you're a fan of breathing cleaner air
Old 09-20-2016, 10:00 PM
  #13  
nine9six
Banned
 
nine9six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,465
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Truer words were never typed^^^!

The 60's were even worse (Long Beach, 20 mi. south of LA)...As a kid, on bad smog days that you could see; I can remember my lungs hurting when taking a deep breath!

Torrence and Wilmington oil refineries, located in the middle of LB and LA, were burning at full tilt, and leaded 98 ron was available @ $ .25 a gallon during gas wars (remember those?). ☺

But the air really suxed back then!

Last edited by nine9six; 09-20-2016 at 10:22 PM.
Old 09-20-2016, 11:38 PM
  #14  
OverBoosted28
Rennlist Member
 
OverBoosted28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Central California
Posts: 3,484
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

I'm sure vehicle efficiency, unleaded fuel, and industrial pollutant reductions have helped. My gripe lies more with the unchecked diesel trucks that are exempt from smog. Maybe a more acceptable format. Classic, sports, and performance car owners shouldn't be held accountable for the 90% of the pollutants, that 7-10% of the vehicles are regularly emitting.
Old 09-21-2016, 12:20 PM
  #15  
Kika
Nordschleife Master
 
Kika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Torrance, CA USA
Posts: 5,631
Received 79 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by goofballdeluxe
Well, I lived in Los Angeles in the 1970s, and the air was foul. Far worse than it is today. Smog checks are a big reason why the air is better now. So there has been a real positive outcome having smog controls here.

We can't control every forest fire. We can control, to a great extent, how many pollutants are emitted into the air we breathe by the emissions regulations. Forest fires may wipe the gains out, but imagine if we had no emissions controls AND forest fires.

Yes, they're a pain in the ***, but we're better off with smog checks, if you're a fan of breathing cleaner air
I grew up in the 70s in a house about 4 miles due south of Mount Wilson. Most days we could NOT see the local mountains. When it was REALLY bad, we had First Stage Smog Alerts, and kids were not allowed to go outside for recess. There were days I would get home from school and my eyes burned so bad, my mom would give me eye drops and put warm compresses over my eyes.

Now, I live 30 miles away from those same mountains, and on most every day of the year, I can see them.

From my perspective, the air quality in Los Angeles has drastically improved in the past 40 years.


Quick Reply: Failed CA Smog Hi NOX



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:50 PM.