I get a free car--Audi A3 TDI or Subaru Outback
#1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sandy, UT/Fish Haven, ID
Posts: 3,033
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
I get a free car--Audi A3 TDI or Subaru Outback
Why does my company standardize on the Audi A3 (TDI and front wheel drive, Quattro isnt available with the TDI diesel) when I live in area that gets a butt load of snow? Got the choice of 2012 Audi A3 TDI, 2012 Dodge Journey SXT, or 2012 Subaru Outback 2.5i Premium PZEV with cold winter package and blue tooth. I wont even mention the Dodge Caravan--wont catch me dead in a mini-van. Just not my cup of tea.
I tried to get the A3 in gas version (with Quattro) but its not an option. I checked out the Dodge JourneySXT and it reminds me a of mini-van. Saw the 2012 Outback today and its sharp---just refined the engine for 2012 and it looks good from an exterior standpoint. Lo
The 2012 Subaru Outback 2.5i Premium with Graphite Gray Metallic exterior and black interior is the route Im going. Always wanted an Outback and now getting one.....for free. I live in the moutains---FWD (Audi A3) isnt a smart move with my lifestyle of mountains, snow, and high elevation. Thats why the other 4 vehicles in the house are either AWD or 4WD.
Like Audi but if it isnt Quattro, I wont have any part of it. Guess I cant complain about a brand new, AWD, Subaru Outback.
Porsche, Ford, Lincoln, Mazda, Subaru--a good mix in the stable.
I tried to get the A3 in gas version (with Quattro) but its not an option. I checked out the Dodge JourneySXT and it reminds me a of mini-van. Saw the 2012 Outback today and its sharp---just refined the engine for 2012 and it looks good from an exterior standpoint. Lo
The 2012 Subaru Outback 2.5i Premium with Graphite Gray Metallic exterior and black interior is the route Im going. Always wanted an Outback and now getting one.....for free. I live in the moutains---FWD (Audi A3) isnt a smart move with my lifestyle of mountains, snow, and high elevation. Thats why the other 4 vehicles in the house are either AWD or 4WD.
Like Audi but if it isnt Quattro, I wont have any part of it. Guess I cant complain about a brand new, AWD, Subaru Outback.
Porsche, Ford, Lincoln, Mazda, Subaru--a good mix in the stable.
The following users liked this post:
steve g (03-14-2020)
#3
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sandy, UT/Fish Haven, ID
Posts: 3,033
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Yea, the Subaru 2.5i Premium isnt the cream of the crop but I also have a Lincoln Navigator that is AWD. If A3 Quattro 2.0T was available, I'd take it. Its a decked out package on the Audi but no AWD on the TDI is a deal killer. I think the 2013 will have Quattro on the diesel.
There was just a recall on the A3 yesterday---fuel injector issue...leaking---just an FYI.
There was just a recall on the A3 yesterday---fuel injector issue...leaking---just an FYI.
#4
Race Car
It's free. The A3 is fine in the snow with FWD. I can't figure out why they don't offer Quattro though with TDI anywhere in the line unless it's to get you to an Audi Q7, or VW Touareg.
#5
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
I spent a week driving A3 TDi in Europe a couple of years ago. Granted, I hate diesels, but this was one of the more frustrating car to drive. Pretty nice chassis, comfortable interior, right size for Urrap... and shaking at the traffic lights like a vibrator at the end of a 3-day orgy.
Very similar feeling to 118d I had to endure in Spain for 2 weeks a year ago. Try to control the car in the mountain twisties when it has no engine to speak of. Brake, turn in, gas.... gas... gas... wait, no. 0-60 in a single day.
I get it. They are cheaper. But, gawd, why, oh, why? Especially in the States where diesel prices are on par with Premium gas.
Very similar feeling to 118d I had to endure in Spain for 2 weeks a year ago. Try to control the car in the mountain twisties when it has no engine to speak of. Brake, turn in, gas.... gas... gas... wait, no. 0-60 in a single day.
I get it. They are cheaper. But, gawd, why, oh, why? Especially in the States where diesel prices are on par with Premium gas.
#6
Nordschleife Master
Subie ... with the flat 4
#7
Instructor
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Your leasing company is offering you some of the cheapest fleet vehicles available, these three are fleet spec's. Which leasing company are you dealing with? In the US, would this be a taxable benefit for you? Thanks.
Bob
Bob
Trending Topics
#8
Race Director
The 2.0 TDI makes 140bhp and 236lb ft of torque. 0-60 in 8.9 seconds.
thats about 1.5 seconds behind a Ferrari 308.
#9
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sandy, UT/Fish Haven, ID
Posts: 3,033
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Up until about a month ago, the standard was the Audi A4 Quattro. Tax credits going green had a shift towards diesel with my company---green credits.
Yea, the options are not the highest end vehicle offerings and I didnt want a car in the first place but I can either take it or not take it at all. I'd like some more HP in the higher end 3.6R Outbacks but its not an option.
The Outback is a very good, all around vehicle to have in Utah with the mega amounts of snow we get here and diversity of the landscape compbined with my outdoor lifestyle. The package on the Audi A3 looks "nicer" but all around practicality based on my lifestyle doesnt point me to a FWD diesel Audi.
#11
Rennlist Member
I've got a vw jsw with the 2.0tdi and I like it a lot. The DSG tranny is pretty good and I've never had a problem with power. While Connecticut isn't Utah, we do get a good amount of snow and the vw with snow tires hasn't had a problem so far.
#12
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sandy, UT/Fish Haven, ID
Posts: 3,033
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
A twin turbo Audi 140hp diesel/FWD isnt quite my cup of tea. Putting on snow tires and chains is not what I would describe as practical with my lifestyle. 8000 feet dumping snow and a FWD isnt a good combination. Roads that require AWD/FWD or chains several times a year--nothing like having to stop and trying to put chains on your vehicle--just not practical. The Outback is by far and away way more of a practical vehicle in high desest of Utah. Combining mountains/snow/lifestyle--the Outback is tough to beat with the choices I have for a vehicle. A FWD vehicle may be just fine for some but there is a reason why every vehicle I own is either AWD or 4WD.
The A3 is a sweet set up what they bundle with it but at the end of the day, I'm not a fan on FWD only. When its dumping snow where I live, I dont want to have to think twice about having issues getting around nor having to worry about another set of winter/snow tires/chains. I watch people in 2WD get stuck on my street on a handful of occassions every winter.
Not quite sure what my tax break is on it but I'll figure it out around tax time.
#13
I'd take FWD with snow tires over AWD with all season tires. I had a Golf TDI and equipped with Blizzaks it would bomb through the Colorado mountains with no problem. Heck, I had a BMW 540 and shod with Blizzaks it handled the Nebraska winter with no issue. AWD with the wrong shoes isn't necessarily the best tool for snow. If you get as much snow as you seem to allude to I'd get snow tires no matter which or how many wheels are being driven. Besides helping with acceleration they will provide superior handling and braking over all seasons. But it sounds like you don't want to be bothered with swapping tires which takes all of 20 minutes or less.
It's always fun to see the AWDs and 4WDs off in the ditch along the freeway in the winter because owners failed to properly equip the vehicle with snows and thought that the AWD aspect made them invincible.
It's always fun to see the AWDs and 4WDs off in the ditch along the freeway in the winter because owners failed to properly equip the vehicle with snows and thought that the AWD aspect made them invincible.