Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998

9m Motec M84 upgrade on non-Varioram

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-14-2011, 08:08 AM
  #106  
NineMeister
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
NineMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 4,443
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Juha G
Colin,

I would like to thank you for helping me as well. Last week we were finally able to start my 993 with the Motec. The problem we had was that in the configuration file I got from you, there was a MAP correction of -100 in the last row of the file. I don't know why it was there but once we corrected that, the engine fired up right away and idled perfectly!!

Tomorrow we will redo the fuel and ignition maps on a dyno but it is so much easier to fine tune the existing maps I got from you vs. starting from a scratch.
For the strongest idle performance you need to use a 1.0bar MAP sensor piped into the intake plenum which provides a correction to the main fuel table as the idle valve opens & closes; the 0-100 correction table (zero MAP = -100% fuel trim, 100MAP = 0% fuel trim) is there for this reason. If you do not have a MAP sensor you should set the sensor default value to 100 which would then fix the fuel correction factor to 0% and you would run purely on the numbers in the main fuel table.


Originally Posted by Juha G
I also ordered the TPC superhcarger kit (without the additional injectors and electronics) last week and will do the install this winter. Can't wait to see the results! This I consider stage I.
Stage II will be a crate 3.8vr3++ engine from you but I first need to figure out how to deal with the yearly smog testing...
We've run a TPC supercharged 964RS on a 9m Motec M48 conversion some years ago and achieved great results. The only aspect that you need to be aware of is heat in the intake manifold because one of the hidden reasons why TPC use a 7th injector in the intake is to use the latent heat of the additional fuel to cool the intake charge to an acceptable level. With Motec and 6 larger injectors you do not have this advantage, so a charge cooler is going to be an essential upgrade if you are to keep a lid on the intake temperatures.

The 9m 993+3 conversions pass cat/smog testing in the UK, however there are some new developments planned for the new year that will see a quantum leap in the performance of our top end 3.82 litre racing engine conversions, the hope is that we can filter these developments down the ladder to provide similar and affordable improvements to the "lesser" packages. Watch this space!
Old 11-14-2011, 08:38 AM
  #107  
Juha G
Rennlist Member
 
Juha G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,527
Received 60 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NineMeister
For the strongest idle performance you need to use a 1.0bar MAP sensor piped into the intake plenum which provides a correction to the main fuel table as the idle valve opens & closes; the 0-100 correction table (zero MAP = -100% fuel trim, 100MAP = 0% fuel trim) is there for this reason. If you do not have a MAP sensor you should set the sensor default value to 100 which would then fix the fuel correction factor to 0% and you would run purely on the numbers in the main fuel table.

Yes, that makes sense and explains it.
I don't have the MAP sensor installed yet so running purely on the alpha-N information. I have a MAP sensor from Motec for which I will make yet another adpator harness so that I can plug into the MAF wire connectors. (already connected to the Motec via the original engine harness).




Originally Posted by NineMeister
We've run a TPC supercharged 964RS on a 9m Motec M48 conversion some years ago and achieved great results. The only aspect that you need to be aware of is heat in the intake manifold because one of the hidden reasons why TPC use a 7th injector in the intake is to use the latent heat of the additional fuel to cool the intake charge to an acceptable level. With Motec and 6 larger injectors you do not have this advantage, so a charge cooler is going to be an essential upgrade if you are to keep a lid on the intake temperatures.
Yes, I am aware of that and will install a water/alcohol injection system to lower the temperatures. I had such system on my 550hp supercharged E46 M3 and it worked like a charm.

Originally Posted by NineMeister
The 9m 993+3 conversions pass cat/smog testing in the UK, however there are some new developments planned for the new year that will see a quantum leap in the performance of our top end 3.82 litre racing engine conversions, the hope is that we can filter these developments down the ladder to provide similar and affordable improvements to the "lesser" packages. Watch this space!
I don't know anything about the smog testing in UK but in Finland they measure the emissions at idle and at 4000rpm, with no load on the engine.
The HC limit is quite easily exceeded with agressive cams like on your engines because of the overlap.

I will stay tuned on this channel Colin!!!
Old 11-14-2011, 12:20 PM
  #108  
evoderby
Pro
 
evoderby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Just buy yourself a bog standard used engine to drop in during yearly smog testing, I would guess a yearly 'engine out' servicing would perfectly suit your 9M vr3 engine anyway ;-)
Old 11-14-2011, 03:03 PM
  #109  
Juha G
Rennlist Member
 
Juha G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,527
Received 60 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

I have to admit, it has crossed my mind...

On the other hand, I'm quite lazy and the ticket for driving with an un-inspected car is only 60 euros...

That is the 1st infraction though and they usually do take your plates and to get them back, you have to have the car pass the inspection.

I can do a BMW six cylinder engine out and put it back in just one evening (and a keg of beer). I have never dropped the 993 engine but I can imagine it will take a lot longer than that...!?
Old 11-14-2011, 04:10 PM
  #110  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Hi Colin,

Thanks for the info. Flap closed to approx 5500 then open. We'll check on the dyno as you say. Do you have a TPS% condition set (i.e. >60%)?

When the car idles 950rpm hot its rock steady using the needle as reference. The idle is however quite a different sound than when its idling at say 1000 rpm. Its more a "romp" romp romp sound. Its sends a shimmy through the car body (bit like a hot Amercian muscle car). It can probably be tuned out a bit but is this characteristic of a lumpier cam with a LWFC and lower inertia pulley hardware?

Thanks again.
Old 11-14-2011, 05:21 PM
  #111  
NineMeister
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
NineMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 4,443
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Macca
Hi Colin,

Thanks for the info. Flap closed to approx 5500 then open. We'll check on the dyno as you say. Do you have a TPS% condition set (i.e. >60%)?

When the car idles 950rpm hot its rock steady using the needle as reference. The idle is however quite a different sound than when its idling at say 1000 rpm. Its more a "romp" romp romp sound. Its sends a shimmy through the car body (bit like a hot Amercian muscle car). It can probably be tuned out a bit but is this characteristic of a lumpier cam with a LWFC and lower inertia pulley hardware?

Thanks again.
I open the flap with TPS > 50% of fully open.

On a common plenum installation, idle irregularity is more than likely down to a small difference in the camshaft timing between the left and right banks of the engine. This is why we now use electronic digital measuring equipment to get the left/right lobe centrelines within 0.10 degrees of each other.
Old 11-14-2011, 06:42 PM
  #112  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Thanks Colin. +5500 rpm, +>50% TPS Open flap. Got that. Low side (ground) activates the flap open from memory?

Can the cams be degreed without taking the engine out and the cam tower covers off etc?

Thanks again.
Old 11-14-2011, 07:34 PM
  #113  
camlob
Pro
 
camlob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NineMeister
I open the flap with TPS > 50% of fully open.

On a common plenum installation, idle irregularity is more than likely down to a small difference in the camshaft timing between the left and right banks of the engine. This is why we now use electronic digital measuring equipment to get the left/right lobe centrelines within 0.10 degrees of each other.
Wow! That instrument is pretty accurate. I wish my shop had that.
Old 11-14-2011, 08:28 PM
  #114  
'95 993
Instructor
 
'95 993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Juha G, I am sure for €60 the emissions probe could be mistakenly placed in the exhaust of the car running next to yours at the emission test centre I believe such things have never ever happened in the UK and such a hypothetical mistake would be so much easier than changine the engine
Old 11-15-2011, 05:13 AM
  #115  
NineMeister
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
NineMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 4,443
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Macca
Thanks Colin. +5500 rpm, +>50% TPS Open flap. Got that. Low side (ground) activates the flap open from memory?

Can the cams be degreed without taking the engine out and the cam tower covers off etc?

Thanks again.
Yes, low side for on. If I remember correctly the vacuum actuators of the 993nVr and 964 resonance flaps work in the opposite directions, so the safest bet is just to dyno "on", dyno "off" and set the switching state as appropriate.

Due to the height of the linear actuator above the cam tower, the only way we could not dial in the cams using our equipment with the engine in the car is by removing the exhaust re-setting the cam timing from the exhaust valve.I would also In theory this would work fine as we would already have the exhaust timing measurements from the initial build, however I would always prefer to work on the intake valve timing if I could. The rotary actuator is not an easy fit either, would have to change the crank pulley and remove the alternator....

... so yes, we would take the engine out. If I can find a set up photo of the rig I will post it later.
Old 11-15-2011, 05:15 AM
  #116  
evoderby
Pro
 
evoderby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by camlob
Wow! That instrument is pretty accurate. I wish my shop had that.
Just install nice and soft engine mounts and you won't notice a thing
Old 11-15-2011, 05:16 AM
  #117  
NineMeister
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
NineMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 4,443
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by camlob
Wow! That instrument is pretty accurate. I wish my shop had that.
Not that expensive to buy the raw kit (around $1500 from memory) but you then need to have the capability to engineer the jigs and fixtures to fit the sensors to the engine properly.
Old 11-15-2011, 09:23 AM
  #118  
NineMeister
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
NineMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 4,443
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Cam sensors on the engine and measurement display. Via a USB link to my laptop, the lift/angle data is recorded through a full 720 degrees rotation of the engine and provides full lift/duration/centreline curves for later analysis. In the report functions velocity, acceleration & jerk of the valve motion is also available.
Attached Images   
Old 08-07-2015, 04:32 PM
  #119  
ClubsportSP
Advanced
 
ClubsportSP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 83
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Folks

Appreciate I'm digging up an old thread but wanted to understand how much of a difference the ITBs make to the figures and to the shape of the curves?

I'm contemplating fitting an m84 to my 87 carrera running a 3.4 with DC20 cams, ti retainers, srp valve springs, and ssis fitted, 10.45:1 CR on single plug. Car is for road use only

Thanks all
Old 04-21-2017, 05:12 PM
  #120  
HiWind
Race Car
 
HiWind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Cape Town, RSA & Sarasota FL
Posts: 4,356
Received 47 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

COLIN THIS THREAD IS MOTEC M84 GOLD
- THANKS SO MUCH!

PLEASE SEND ME A DM WHEN YOU READ THIS!


Quick Reply: 9m Motec M84 upgrade on non-Varioram



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:01 AM.