Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Lord, is the 991.2 a fast car!

Old 10-06-2016, 08:32 PM
  #46  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,163
Received 3,857 Likes on 1,901 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jimbo1111
It's a great lap! No doubt. What would lap 2 ,3 and so one look like? Have porsche engineers accounted for heat soak. I guess time will tell.
Don't think that's the point of the car or the test.

I'm fairly certain the .2S is a beast in the twisty bits and canyon roads where 99% of the performance miles get put on most Porsche sports cars, and will run up there with the .1 GT cars.

And heat soak didn't seem to be a problem on the Ring.
Old 10-06-2016, 09:13 PM
  #47  
Spyerx
Rennlist Member
 
Spyerx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 16,482
Received 1,729 Likes on 1,057 Posts
Default

lotta people here don't know willow springs
this is a horsepower track bottom line. it's REALLY fast. and you need REALLY big ***** to go fast there. It's not a technical track, it warrants horsepower and grip over agility.

Also, would want to know when the tests were run on the .2 vs. turbo vs. gt3. Willow gets very windy and scary as FK in turn 8-9 in the afternoons, especially in the summer. Plus, it can be 120 there in summer...

Those differences along can mean seconds in lap times there.

anyway, car is clearly very fast, just hard to call it an apples:apples if the tests weren't all run on the same day.

To add some comparos: POC runs at big willow a lot. There is a driver of a 991 cup car that is in the 1:23 range. Sometimes you see guys around 120 flat...

Goes to show you how fast these street cars are.
Old 10-06-2016, 10:37 PM
  #48  
maxpowers
Pro
 
maxpowers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 725
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by neanicu
Porsche's main focus from a marketing perspective is to make each new gen faster. The way the industry is going,I don't see how they could come out with a car that has the same power levels as the old gen and be just as fast or even slower. I personally could care less about their numbers and power levels,all I care is how I feel when I get behind the wheel. If I like it then it's mine. I've had it with fast fast fast...fast until what point? The limit has been pretty much reached or close to it. On the street at least...it's where these cars spend most of their time. So why do we buy into " fast "? Pure marketing is why...
It's the same reason why cars that try to use a healthy concept from the driver's perspective like the Cayman GT4 or 911R will continue to win awards,because a good car is not only about " fast ".
Well said! I think we reached the level where faster isn't better a long time ago. I don't know about you, but I don't buy a sports car for its lap times or the number it generates, but for the smile it puts on my face when I'm driving
Old 10-06-2016, 10:42 PM
  #49  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,163
Received 3,857 Likes on 1,901 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by maxpowers
Well said! I think we reached the level where faster isn't better a long time ago. I don't know about you, but I don't buy a sports car for its lap times or the number it generates, but for the smile it puts on my face when I'm driving
For some people, how fast a car goes is part of what puts a smile on their face. And the idea that the HP and torque of the .2 isn't usable on the street is nonsense. We're not talking about a 918 here. I'd have more fun in a 500hp 911 than I would in a 400hp 911, particularly if the latter had more usable torque. I'm not a fan of FI, but I'm honest enough to admit that these new cars are pretty awesome.

Last edited by Archimedes; 10-06-2016 at 11:02 PM.
Old 10-06-2016, 10:57 PM
  #50  
dflowerz
Burning Brakes
 
dflowerz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: El Dorado Hills, CA
Posts: 834
Received 65 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Everyone has a sweet spot for what is important in a sports car. My 991.2 really hit that spot for me. I think there was a big jump between the 991.1 and the 991.2 due to the turbo power and all that low end torque. Now will be back to incremental improvements until the hybrid 911 hits the market. Then the low end torque will be even more. Curious to see what the weight of a hybrid 911 will be. For now I am really happy with my 911. Fast and handles like a dream So much fun on the back roads.
Old 10-06-2016, 11:09 PM
  #51  
DD GT3 RD
Rennlist Member
 
DD GT3 RD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,255
Received 445 Likes on 194 Posts
Default

Id almost say it's a grip and aero track. 3,4,5,6 is technical. Know some pretty low horsepower cars that fly there. Look at Jack Olsen. 270hp - 1:26 now Know some s2k down there. Think jack only hits 130s on the straight

Originally Posted by Spyerx
lotta people here don't know willow springs
this is a horsepower track bottom line. it's REALLY fast. and you need REALLY big ***** to go fast there. It's not a technical track, it warrants horsepower and grip over agility.

Also, would want to know when the tests were run on the .2 vs. turbo vs. gt3. Willow gets very windy and scary as FK in turn 8-9 in the afternoons, especially in the summer. Plus, it can be 120 there in summer...

Those differences along can mean seconds in lap times there.

anyway, car is clearly very fast, just hard to call it an apples:apples if the tests weren't all run on the same day.

To add some comparos: POC runs at big willow a lot. There is a driver of a 991 cup car that is in the 1:23 range. Sometimes you see guys around 120 flat...

Goes to show you how fast these street cars are.
Old 10-06-2016, 11:16 PM
  #52  
Bemo
Drifting
 
Bemo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: CT
Posts: 2,009
Received 259 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

For those that equate speed with fun, the 991.2 is a sweet step forward.
I however was thoroughly disappointed with the non-PSE base that I test drove and how quiet it seemed, so much so that I cut the test drive short and bought a 991.1 GTS sight unseen.
Full disclosure: I've always lusted for a large displacement NA motor and got my fix. The wide hips on the GTS and sweet discount, the icing on a perfect Porsche cake.

Speed and efficiency go to the .2
Theatrics, induction/exhaust sound and linear acceleration .1 all day long...
Old 10-06-2016, 11:24 PM
  #53  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,163
Received 3,857 Likes on 1,901 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bemo
For those that equate speed with fun, the 991.2 is a sweet step forward. I however was thoroughly disappointed with the non-PSE base that I test drove and how quiet it seemed, so much so that I cut the test drive short and bought a 991.1 GTS sight unseen. Full disclosure: I've always lusted for a large displacement NA motor and got my fix. The wide hips on the GTS and sweet discount, the icing on a perfect Porsche cake. Speed and efficiency go to the .2 Theatrics, induction/exhaust sound and linear acceleration .1 all day long...
Love my .1, but, in addition to speed, the .2 also steers better and has a more refined suspension.
Old 10-07-2016, 12:37 AM
  #54  
Dewinator
Drifting
 
Dewinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 3,096
Received 44 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

I'm blowed away by how much speed they manage out of the 3.0 every time I see one of these.

On the other hand, I'm relieved that the faster/quieter car doesn't really have any draw for me so I'm not tempted to spend monies I really should save for adulting on it.

If the 911R were easy to get, I'd be screwed.
Old 10-07-2016, 12:45 AM
  #55  
Spyerx
Rennlist Member
 
Spyerx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 16,482
Received 1,729 Likes on 1,057 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DD GT3 RD
Id almost say it's a grip and aero track. 3,4,5,6 is technical. Know some pretty low horsepower cars that fly there. Look at Jack Olsen. 270hp - 1:26 now Know some s2k down there. Think jack only hits 130s on the straight
His car is LIGHT with that power. The tech sections are like 1/4 the track distance. And yes aero does make a difference. But this track rewards horsepower more than any other track in ca other than auto club.
Old 10-07-2016, 08:54 AM
  #56  
Gary JR
Rennlist Member
 
Gary JR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: S Carolina coast & N Carolina mountains
Posts: 1,785
Received 158 Likes on 113 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bemo
For those that equate speed with fun, the 991.2 is a sweet step forward.
I however was thoroughly disappointed with the non-PSE base that I test drove and how quiet it seemed, so much so that I cut the test drive short and bought a 991.1 GTS sight unseen.
Full disclosure: I've always lusted for a large displacement NA motor and got my fix. The wide hips on the GTS and sweet discount, the icing on a perfect Porsche cake.

Speed and efficiency go to the .2
Theatrics, induction/exhaust sound and linear acceleration .1 all day long...
So add PSE .2 wins?
Old 10-07-2016, 09:11 AM
  #57  
LexVan
Banned
 
LexVan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Chicagoland Area
Posts: 26,142
Likes: 0
Received 5,388 Likes on 2,509 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dewinator
I'm blowed away by how much speed they manage out of the 3.0 every time I see one of these.
Yep! And remember the 2.0L race motor in the 919 Hybrid Spyder puts out over 500HP. Along with another 500HP from the electronic motor. So, Porsche does know turbocharging.
Old 10-07-2016, 09:36 AM
  #58  
GSIRM3
Drifting
 
GSIRM3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,603
Received 63 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

The .2 is a good car, but I am not going to rush out and trade my 991 GTS for one. People can say I'm in denial or whatever else they want to say, but I wouldn't trade even dollars for one.
Old 10-07-2016, 10:27 AM
  #59  
jimbo1111
Banned
 
jimbo1111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 3,687
Received 36 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GSIRM3
The .2 is a good car, but I am not going to rush out and trade my 991 GTS for one. People can say I'm in denial or whatever else they want to say, but I wouldn't trade even dollars for one.

There isn't enough there to pull me out either. There might be a good argument with the standard base model 991.1 vs 991.2 although.
Old 10-07-2016, 11:51 AM
  #60  
dflowerz
Burning Brakes
 
dflowerz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: El Dorado Hills, CA
Posts: 834
Received 65 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

I would not jump from a 991.1 GTS to a 991.2 either, but I just happened to get serious about buying a 911 right when the 991.2 was announced. Placed an order in October of 2015 and did not get the car until May 2016.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Lord, is the 991.2 a fast car!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:44 PM.