Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Autocar reviews the GTS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-22-2014, 01:23 AM
  #1  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,345
Likes: 0
Received 10,780 Likes on 4,774 Posts
Default Autocar reviews the GTS

Old 11-22-2014, 02:33 AM
  #2  
VOLTCONTROL
Instructor
 
VOLTCONTROL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 232
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Thnx for posting. Steve Sutcliffe keeps banging on about the GT3 a bit too much, making it a bit of a one dimensional review imho. Lovely to see the thing on these roads in the video.
Old 11-22-2014, 09:32 AM
  #3  
todd92
Racer
 
todd92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VOLTCONTROL
Thnx for posting. Steve Sutcliffe keeps banging on about the GT3 a bit too much, making it a bit of a one dimensional review imho. Lovely to see the thing on these roads in the video.

Huh? Not once does he say the GT3 is too much. Mostly he's saying the GTS isn't close to be being a GT3 light and isn't really that different from a S. What difference he can notice is entirely the X51. Seems like a pretty honest review to me.
Old 11-22-2014, 09:53 AM
  #4  
motenai
Intermediate
 
motenai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by todd92
Huh? Not once does he say the GT3 is too much. Mostly he's saying the GTS isn't close to be being a GT3 light and isn't really that different from a S. What difference he can notice is entirely the X51. Seems like a pretty honest review to me.
What VOLTCONTROL is saying is that Steve Sutcliffe is talking about the GT3 too much, meaning he thinks the review is biased toward the GT3. The review is mainly how the GTS isn't a GT3, not much about how the GTS is a step up from an S.
Old 11-22-2014, 10:06 AM
  #5  
todd92
Racer
 
todd92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

He makes it pretty clear that he doesn't think it is much of a step up from the S. He talks about the GT3 so much because the GTS costs damn near as much and is being touted as a more livable GT3.
Old 11-22-2014, 12:33 PM
  #6  
hfm
Three Wheelin'
 
hfm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: CA
Posts: 1,423
Received 85 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Nice GT3 review.
Old 11-22-2014, 12:53 PM
  #7  
9914s
Rennlist Member
 
9914s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Wellington FL
Posts: 1,306
Received 254 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

The review is exactly what I was expecting. The car is really nothing more than a c4s with the x51 power package.
Old 11-22-2014, 01:40 PM
  #8  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,537
Received 3,441 Likes on 2,248 Posts
Default

Here's the thing, just how big is the gap between an S and GT3 anyway, and how do you 'measure' that?

OK we know that there is an extra 45bhp, the RWS, etc etc, but how does that manifest itself?

Some of that analysis can be measured (lap time) but some of it will be subjective too...

Personally I would like to see EVO do a track battle video (at Anglesey) comparing the two cars on track, now we KNOW the GT3 will win, but by how much...

Maybe even go 3 way with an S (with or w/o X51)

I think the gaps will not be that large.

We all know that the GTS is marketed as a filler, but its marketing... truth is its simply a good deal if you wanted an S with X51 etc...

So basically I'm saying is Autocar were measuring the wrong criteria
Old 11-22-2014, 02:20 PM
  #9  
STG
Race Director
 
STG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: FL
Posts: 13,800
Likes: 0
Received 193 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

The GT3 is a track car you can drive on the street.


The GTS is a street car you can drive on the track.


The GTS shouldn't be compared to the GT3 no more than the S should be. It's a whole different beast and serves it's own purpose.

You can go around in circles all day.
Old 11-22-2014, 02:29 PM
  #10  
hinckley
Three Wheelin'
 
hinckley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,409
Received 253 Likes on 144 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 9914s
The review is exactly what I was expecting. The car is really nothing more than a c4s with the x51 power package.
Originally Posted by Larry Cable
We all know that the GTS is marketed as a filler, but its marketing... truth is its simply a good deal if you wanted an S with X51 etc...

So basically I'm saying is Autocar were measuring the wrong criteria
+1

The GTS is just an option package and some marketing hype. I'm getting one, but only because I saved money on my S order. There's nothing wrong with any of that, but no one should think that the GTS is really a separate model.
Old 11-22-2014, 02:36 PM
  #11  
arter
Rennlist Member
 
arter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,063
Received 152 Likes on 92 Posts
Default

I think that the car Steve was given was so loaded up with options that the cost difference was affecting his evaluation. ( I could get a GT3 for less than this....).

The GTS could just be a cheaper way to get certain S options ( plus some novel body upgrades). In this case, it isn't expensive, and with the X-51 kit, it is more powerful than the standard S.

Now if it had more hp than the standard X-51 kit ( or was much lighter)......
Old 11-22-2014, 02:40 PM
  #12  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,345
Likes: 0
Received 10,780 Likes on 4,774 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable
Here's the thing, just how big is the gap between an S and GT3 anyway, and how do you 'measure' that?

OK we know that there is an extra 45bhp, the RWS, etc etc, but how does that manifest itself?

Some of that analysis can be measured (lap time) but some of it will be subjective too...

Personally I would like to see EVO do a track battle video (at Anglesey) comparing the two cars on track, now we KNOW the GT3 will win, but by how much...

Maybe even go 3 way with an S (with or w/o X51)

I think the gaps will not be that large.

We all know that the GTS is marketed as a filler, but its marketing... truth is its simply a good deal if you wanted an S with X51 etc...

So basically I'm saying is Autocar were measuring the wrong criteria
Fellow Rennlister Money2536 sums it pretty well, and his car had the X51.

https://rennlist.com/forums/991/844049-my-comparison-of-the-991-c2s-to-the-gt3.html
Old 11-22-2014, 09:25 PM
  #13  
kaution321
Rennlist Member
 
kaution321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by arter
I think that the car Steve was given was so loaded up with options that the cost difference was affecting his evaluation. ( I could get a GT3 for less than this....). The GTS could just be a cheaper way to get certain S options ( plus some novel body upgrades). In this case, it isn't expensive, and with the X-51 kit, it is more powerful than the standard S. Now if it had more hp than the standard X-51 kit ( or was much lighter)......
+1. You hit it right on the nail. GTS is simply a loaded up S with the wider body. E.g., if I checked the power kit option on my Carrera S order I wouldn't be getting a Carrera S since the GTS would be a no brained at that point with all the added options that comes standard with the GTS.

On the other hand if I wanted more power and didn't need a backseat it would be the GT3 hands down.

GT3 = ultimate performance on the race track and basically a race car that you can drive on the street if needed. If I didn't need a backseat I would have been a GT3 owner yesterday.

GTS = dressed up Carrera S with the power kit.

C2S = best drivers car that can be driven both on the race track and in the street. For me the only choice was either C2S or GT3 and felt that the performance gap between the two are unquestionably noticeable.
Old 11-23-2014, 04:21 AM
  #14  
StudGarden
Burning Brakes
 
StudGarden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,108
Received 47 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Yeah but can it drift?
Old 11-23-2014, 05:42 AM
  #15  
pap2828
Racer
 
pap2828's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I happen to think his review overall was fair and measured and he was giving his view.

However, for me the 4GTS is going to give me exactly what I want it from it...

A naughtier, rarer, meatier Carrera S that looks amazing on the daily driver roads.

I would never consider a GT3 because for me it looks more track than road and thats not for me!

I think Porsche have got it just right...and can't wait for mine in March!!!!


Quick Reply: Autocar reviews the GTS



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:14 PM.