Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

991RS Review thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-18-2015, 08:42 AM
  #646  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRAKCAR
Mine won't bring 6 figure with 10k miles always put away wet.
Or at least I'm going to do all I can to make it so because the car is way out of my pay scale, real proper abuse will do it. It guzzles oil, tires and it's too fast for my talent.

I'm 1 payment in at 6000 miles lol. 10k after Winterfest I bet.
Then again it didn't work so well with my 4.0 and we all know how I shoulda never sold that.
Than I have my 964 RSA that is pretty much 964 CUP + spec with interior and AC (and fuel cell custom cage custom everything)..I bought it with 4.0 left over money to carry me over to the next RS. I figured I won't like it and threatened the seller that if I don't like it he needs to take it back. Now I know why he was so confident. Nothing is more fun to wring out my RSA it's the car that tells me the most that I should have more talent but lack there off needs a coach ;-)
But of course in the last 24 months the 964's went nuts. Seems like the market is doing everything it can to make me sell these awesome cars.

Fingers crossed the bottom falls out mid Feb so im stuck with my hot rod RSA 991RS and GT4.
Who needs retirement money when you have no kids. We can skip whole foods and try the Walmart thing.
Amen! On the same track but swap 964 RSA for 993 to RS++ spec and 991 GT3RS for 991 GT3. I hate the market where it is now and rather it drop so we can get into flipping cars when and as we feel like without a mortgage increase. Back in the day i told you youd love the aircooled experience when you were between GT3s. Im betting the RSA stays longer than any of your GT3s :-). They are totally different experiences and the best is to own both of course LOL!
Old 11-18-2015, 08:44 AM
  #647  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Manifold
This is the dilemma. Buy the car for $200K, and say it's now worth $350K in an overheated market. You can sell the car, buy an almost new GT3, and still have $200K left over. Or you can garage queen the car, which means you derive almost no enjoyment from it, and it may eventually depreciate anyway, possibly back down to MSRP or below, so maybe $150K lost by holding on to it. Or you can drive it and enjoy it, maybe on the track, which will surely hurt the depreciation even more, and you have to be comfortable doing that in a car currently worth about $350K, and need to consider the cost of insuring it. Based on the compelling financial considerations, I'd have to take the cash and run.

Or if you're in TRAKCAR's position and the car is already truly used, don't look back, drive the hell out of it, and enjoy. That's what I'm doing with my regular GT3 - at this point the potential resale value of the car if/when I sell it is just not a factor for me.
This is where Im at with my GT3 too. All cars paid up front so not worried about depreciation. Cars arent for making money just takes the fun out of it for me...
Old 11-18-2015, 09:23 AM
  #648  
Kobalt
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Kobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Europe
Posts: 4,848
Received 418 Likes on 197 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Macca
I hate the market where it is now and rather it drop so we can get into flipping cars when and as we feel like without a mortgage increase.
We where at the brink of a situation where 997 GT3's where about to be so cheap that they would be perfect to build light weight track oriented cars of.
Now they are too expensive to do that with.
Old 11-18-2015, 09:46 AM
  #649  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,394
Received 3,744 Likes on 2,172 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kobalt
"I was so at ease with this street-legal beast [991 GT3] that my best lap was four tenths of a second faster than my quickest time in the GT3 Cup race car."

This makes me wonder how good a driver the reviewer is, and therefore how much weight should be given to his review. At my local track, driven by a good pro, the 991 cup will be around 1:13s and the 991 GT3 will be around 1:18s.
Old 11-18-2015, 12:09 PM
  #650  
alaint101
Racer
 
alaint101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Macca
This is where Im at with my GT3 too. All cars paid up front so not worried about depreciation. Cars arent for making money just takes the fun out of it for me...
+1
Old 11-18-2015, 12:31 PM
  #651  
Nizer
Rennlist Member
 
Nizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wishing I Was At The Track
Posts: 13,512
Received 1,720 Likes on 913 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Manifold
"I was so at ease with this street-legal beast [991 GT3] that my best lap was four tenths of a second faster than my quickest time in the GT3 Cup race car."

This makes me wonder how good a driver the reviewer is, and therefore how much weight should be given to his review. At my local track, driven by a good pro, the 991 cup will be around 1:13s and the 991 GT3 will be around 1:18s.
Agreed. Maybe it was faster than his spin lap in the Cup, otherwise it's a pretty uninformed review.
Old 11-25-2015, 10:33 AM
  #652  
Kobalt
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Kobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Europe
Posts: 4,848
Received 418 Likes on 197 Posts
Default

Old 11-25-2015, 11:10 AM
  #653  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,394
Received 3,744 Likes on 2,172 Posts
Default

^ Comparison was on a wet track with the RS having better tires for a wet track. For me, that renders the comparison meaningless, and I'd like see the comparison repeated on a dry track, ideally with the GT4 having the same N1 tires (which I assume it will, eventually). Interesting that N1 tires were made available first in RS sizes, and still not available in the GT3 and GT4 sizes ...
Old 11-26-2015, 04:19 AM
  #654  
Kobalt
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Kobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Europe
Posts: 4,848
Received 418 Likes on 197 Posts
Default

Teaser Evo ECOTY

Old 11-26-2015, 04:53 AM
  #655  
Kobalt
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Kobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Europe
Posts: 4,848
Received 418 Likes on 197 Posts
Default

Teaser for Swedish magazine Bilsports comparison RS VS GT3

Old 11-26-2015, 10:12 AM
  #656  
carcommander
Rennlist Member
 
carcommander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,263
Received 276 Likes on 152 Posts
Default

I have the same thoughts as others. I am MSRP into a 300K car. My RS is my favorite 911 ever. The best sense is to sell it and take the money. The 16 year old boy racer in me says says screw that. I am 60.

I have paid depreciation on many cars. I will look at it that way.
Old 11-26-2015, 12:16 PM
  #657  
FastLaneTurbo
Burning Brakes
 
FastLaneTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Port Orange, FL
Posts: 1,157
Received 91 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

GERMAN TRACK’S LATEST 991 LAPTIMES

Autozeitung Test Track: GT3RS 1:32.50, TT 1:33.40, GT3 1:33.50

Hockenheim GP: GT3RS, 1:50.78, GT3 1:53.90

Hockenheim Short: GT3RS 1:08.50, TTS 1:08.70, TT 1:09.30, GT3 1:09.5

Sachsenring: TTS 1:32.51, TT 1:32.92, GT3 1:32.97
Old 11-26-2015, 12:28 PM
  #658  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,394
Received 3,744 Likes on 2,172 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FastLaneTurbo
GERMAN TRACK’S LATEST 991 LAPTIMES

Autozeitung Test Track: GT3RS 1:32.50, TT 1:33.40, GT3 1:33.50

Hockenheim GP: GT3RS, 1:50.78, GT3 1:53.90

Hockenheim Short: GT3RS 1:08.50, TTS 1:08.70, TT 1:09.30, GT3 1:09.5

Sachsenring: TTS 1:32.51, TT 1:32.92, GT3 1:32.97
The RS having the N1 tire instead of the N0 on the GT3 was a surprise to many of us, so now I'm wondering: was the N1 just introduced recently, or is the N1 on all of the RS cars? That would affect the interpretation of these lap times and the delta between the GT3 and RS. But in general, so far it seems that the delta is less than the 2 s I would have estimated. With the reported 'ring times of 7:20 and 7:25, if you divide the 5 s delta by five to get the estimated delta on shorter tracks, that gives a 1 s delta, which is generally in line with the above numbers. I know the aero of the RS will slow its acceleration in the straights, but I'm still surprised that the additional downforce, wider tires, and likely better N1 tires aren't producing a larger delta compared to the GT3. Maybe the RS is harder to drive, even for pros? Some of the anecdotal info I got does suggest that.
Old 11-26-2015, 12:49 PM
  #659  
karimgt3
Pro
 
karimgt3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Manifold
The RS having the N1 tire instead of the N0 on the GT3 was a surprise to many of us, so now I'm wondering: was the N1 just introduced recently, or is the N1 on all of the RS cars? That would affect the interpretation of these lap times and the delta between the GT3 and RS. But in general, so far it seems that the delta is less than the 2 s I would have estimated. With the reported 'ring times of 7:20 and 7:25, if you divide the 5 s delta by five to get the estimated delta on shorter tracks, that gives a 1 s delta, which is generally in line with the above numbers. I know the aero of the RS will slow its acceleration in the straights, but I'm still surprised that the additional downforce, wider tires, and likely better N1 tires aren't producing a larger delta compared to the GT3. Maybe the RS is harder to drive, even for pros? Some of the anecdotal info I got does suggest that.
I've been reading about this N1 tire issue over and over, but do we actually have proof, or any stated facts from michelin or porsche that it is a better version of the N0, or that it actually presents more grip?

Always trying to justify the delta of the RS over the GT3 will get us nowhere..

The GT3 is already way up there in terms of performance, so even if the difference is a second or more, on a 1min+ lap, its huge!

The GT3 will have hoosiers soon? So will the RS, u never know!
Old 11-26-2015, 01:04 PM
  #660  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,394
Received 3,744 Likes on 2,172 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by karimgt3
I've been reading about this N1 tire issue over and over, but do we actually have proof, or any stated facts from michelin or porsche that it is a better version of the N0, or that it actually presents more grip?

Always trying to justify the delta of the RS over the GT3 will get us nowhere..

The GT3 is already way up there in terms of performance, so even if the difference is a second or more, on a 1min+ lap, its huge!

The GT3 will have hoosiers soon? So will the RS, u never know!
I recall reading that the N1 has better grip in both wet and dry, but don't recall the sources and their reliability. I guess we need more data.

I'd say that 1 s is 'substantial' but not huge. My own lap times vary 2+ s depending on tire pressure/heat, track conditions, how hard I'm comfortable pushing, etc. And among DE drivers of the 991 GT3 in top run groups, I sometimes see well over 2 s variation in lap times.

I do estimate that the R7 will drop our lap time around 3 s on these kinds of tracks, and it may even last longer than our Cup 2, though the effect on the warranty is still uncertain to me.


Quick Reply: 991RS Review thread



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:07 AM.