Notices
964 Turbo Forum 1989-1994

Tire issue??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-31-2016, 05:32 PM
  #16  
urquattro20Vt
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
urquattro20Vt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,139
Received 104 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

this might be a better pic but the lighting/shadow makes the car look more lowered than it really is.
Attached Images  
Old 10-31-2016, 10:40 PM
  #17  
bonehead
Rennlist Member
 
bonehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,326
Received 291 Likes on 130 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by urquattro20Vt
Hey Ed-
Yeah - to confirm - the new fronts cleared things up. So if you put new Super Sports on back - I have to recommend fronts, too. I run the factory 3.6 Speedlines - not reps. Can't recall offhand the ET but I'm thinking either 57 or 62? I do run a 4 or 5mm space in back because the car came with them - and it pushes the rears out just a little more to fill out the wheel wells. My car is lowered on H&Rs and I did nothing to camber or anything. That said the car had 285/35 PS2's when I bought it - but I don't think the tire size necessitates and changes to anything, frankly. No rubbing.
Thanks Brandon!
285's are quite a bit more $$$. Not sure it's worth the extra dinero to me over the stock 265's. But wow, your car is perfect!
Are those OEM clear signal lamps or the Dansk versions?
Old 11-01-2016, 12:24 AM
  #18  
Igooz
Trucker
Rennlist Member
 
Igooz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Permanently Banned
Posts: 4,009
Received 470 Likes on 265 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bonehead
Thanks Brandon!
285's are quite a bit more $$$. Not sure it's worth the extra dinero to me over the stock 265's. But wow, your car is perfect!
Are those OEM clear signal lamps or the Dansk versions?
285 vs 265 is almost 1" which is a significant amount IMHO. It makes a lot of difference if your wheels are wide enough. And pushing the wheels out with spacers to the max will further enhance the stance of these wide bodies. (I drove my 1991 from 1993-2001 and I did the above and it was worth it IMHO.)
Old 11-01-2016, 07:35 AM
  #19  
bonehead
Rennlist Member
 
bonehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,326
Received 291 Likes on 130 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Igooz
285 vs 265 is almost 1" which is a significant amount IMHO. It makes a lot of difference if your wheels are wide enough. And pushing the wheels out with spacers to the max will further enhance the stance of these wide bodies. (I drove my 1991 from 1993-2001 and I did the above and it was worth it IMHO.)
I need to stop visiting forums. Never ends well for my bank account.
How about the fronts? 235/40/18 or stick with 225/40?
Old 11-01-2016, 12:45 PM
  #20  
urquattro20Vt
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
urquattro20Vt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,139
Received 104 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

I prefer as much mechanical grip as I can reasonably get - and so for me - 285. Actually I'd probably do 295/30 over 285/35 if I had a choice with this tire. Plus I wouldn't want to go 265 on a 10" wheel.
My understanding is you can get rubbing issues going 235 up front. May need to space it out, and roll the fender. Paul will probably clarify if I'm mistaken.

Dansk clears.
Old 11-01-2016, 01:38 PM
  #21  
Metal Guru
Rennlist Member
 
Metal Guru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Beverly Hills, Mi.
Posts: 4,521
Received 429 Likes on 309 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by urquattro20Vt
I prefer as much mechanical grip as I can reasonably get - and so for me - 285. Actually I'd probably do 295/30 over 285/35 if I had a choice with this tire. Plus I wouldn't want to go 265 on a 10" wheel.
My understanding is you can get rubbing issues going 235 up front. May need to space it out, and roll the fender. Paul will probably clarify if I'm mistaken.

Dansk clears.
I run 295's out the back. My wheels are 10.75 wide so 265's would look pretty ghetto.
I run 235's up front with rolled fender lips and 6 mm spacers. No rubbing will occur if you do that.
Old 11-01-2016, 03:11 PM
  #22  
bonehead
Rennlist Member
 
bonehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,326
Received 291 Likes on 130 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by urquattro20Vt
I prefer as much mechanical grip as I can reasonably get - and so for me - 285. Actually I'd probably do 295/30 over 285/35 if I had a choice with this tire. Plus I wouldn't want to go 265 on a 10" wheel.
My understanding is you can get rubbing issues going 235 up front. May need to space it out, and roll the fender. Paul will probably clarify if I'm mistaken.

Dansk clears.
Originally Posted by Metal Guru
I run 295's out the back. My wheels are 10.75 wide so 265's would look pretty ghetto.
I run 235's up front with rolled fender lips and 6 mm spacers. No rubbing will occur if you do that.
Thanks gentlemen. Rather not deal with spacers and fender rolling. Sounds like 225/40, 285/35 is the ticket.
Old 11-01-2016, 07:35 PM
  #23  
Igooz
Trucker
Rennlist Member
 
Igooz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Permanently Banned
Posts: 4,009
Received 470 Likes on 265 Posts
Default

F: 225 is enough. 235 is doable, no issues, just need to check for spacer need at jounce.

R: You can go even go up 305 on the rear if you like...
I have 305's on my '87 right now no fender rolling! (Yes, rear suspension is different.) I measured everything like 100 times.

Frankly, Metalguru has the best stance for the 964 IMO.



Quick Reply: Tire issue??



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:25 AM.