Ball joint- above or below a-arm?
#1
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
Ball joint- above or below a-arm?
The 964 factory manual clearly shows the ball joint bolting up below the a-arm, with the caster eccentric head facing the ground.
Here is a pic from DC Automotive-
Then I come across this photo on Patrick Motorsports website which shows the ball joint mounted above the a-arm. This is on a 993, but it's the same in front as the 964 as far as I know-
Is there an advantage to flipping the a-arms over and swapping the left and right to mount the ball joint above the a-arm? Does it even matter?
Here is a pic from DC Automotive-
Then I come across this photo on Patrick Motorsports website which shows the ball joint mounted above the a-arm. This is on a 993, but it's the same in front as the 964 as far as I know-
Is there an advantage to flipping the a-arms over and swapping the left and right to mount the ball joint above the a-arm? Does it even matter?
#2
Nordschleife Master
Wow, good catch. Never seen it done like that. It would be interesting to hear what folks like Bill Verburg and perelet say about this.
As far as swapping the arms, there's no need for that. Both arms are identical. You would have to flip the pressed bolt/stud on the arm tho. So I guess if you're already removing the arms, swapping them side-to-side would be easier than pressing the pin out and back in going the other way.
As far as swapping the arms, there's no need for that. Both arms are identical. You would have to flip the pressed bolt/stud on the arm tho. So I guess if you're already removing the arms, swapping them side-to-side would be easier than pressing the pin out and back in going the other way.
#5
Drifting
Mounted as in the picture, doesn't it make the upriight sit higher. Meaning that the tie rod comes even higher, meaning that bump steer gets even worse? Mounted as in the PET diagram must be better. Or?!
Thomas
Thomas
#6
Nordschleife Master
What governs the height of the upright and tie-rod is above the carrier since the strut/spring attach to the carrier not the arm. Doing this change would not affect the car's ride height, but given the same ride height, the change would benefit the geometry equivalent to running a slightly higher ride height.
Flipping the ball joint as pictured would have a roll center correcting effect equivalent to however much the difference in a-arm position is between the lower and upper ball joint installation configuration.
More technical discussion on the topic.
http://www.meganracing.com/tech/faqs...ct=Suspension:
Flipping the ball joint as pictured would have a roll center correcting effect equivalent to however much the difference in a-arm position is between the lower and upper ball joint installation configuration.
More technical discussion on the topic.
http://www.meganracing.com/tech/faqs...ct=Suspension:
#7
No, unless the attachment point to the upright is moved, i.e. ball joint up or down vs. wheel center, there will be no affect on RC or steering geometry. The arm can be shaped like a pretzel, the only thing that matters is the relative location of the pivots..
Angling the arm down like that might provide a bit more clearance to the tub just above the front bushing, protect the caster adjuster, or they just got them mixed up. Someone should ask Patrick, while the rest of us place our bets
Angling the arm down like that might provide a bit more clearance to the tub just above the front bushing, protect the caster adjuster, or they just got them mixed up. Someone should ask Patrick, while the rest of us place our bets
Trending Topics
#8
Nordschleife Master
Doing this change would reduce clearance for the brake scoops since they are mounted to the arm and the side of the arm closest to the wheel would be in a lower position.
#9
Nordschleife Master
I just thought about this thread while looking at pics of my lower control arms removed from the car.
This alteration in suspension setup can be achieved without having to remove the pressed stud from the lower control arms. Instead, just swap the lower control arms between sides, and that in itself will put the pressed stud facing the opposite direction (upward) and allow you to run the ball joint in the above position.
EDIT: Just realized I said ^this^ in my first reply.
This alteration in suspension setup can be achieved without having to remove the pressed stud from the lower control arms. Instead, just swap the lower control arms between sides, and that in itself will put the pressed stud facing the opposite direction (upward) and allow you to run the ball joint in the above position.
EDIT: Just realized I said ^this^ in my first reply.
Last edited by Vandit; 01-06-2014 at 12:31 AM.
#10
Nordschleife Master
I actually sent Patrick Motorsport a Facebook message and a link to this thread some time back, but I never heard back from them.
I still think it's a way to ever so slightly improve the car's roll center geometry and dial out bump steer when running at low low ride height.
I still think it's a way to ever so slightly improve the car's roll center geometry and dial out bump steer when running at low low ride height.
#15
Nordschleife Master
Contact this guy and ask.
http://emotionengineering.co
He setup Spyerx's car and put the ball joint above the control arm.
http://emotionengineering.co
He setup Spyerx's car and put the ball joint above the control arm.