Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ball joint- above or below a-arm?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-2013, 02:08 PM
  #1  
-nick
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
-nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cambridge/Boston, MA
Posts: 1,781
Received 104 Likes on 80 Posts
Default Ball joint- above or below a-arm?

The 964 factory manual clearly shows the ball joint bolting up below the a-arm, with the caster eccentric head facing the ground.

Here is a pic from DC Automotive-


Then I come across this photo on Patrick Motorsports website which shows the ball joint mounted above the a-arm. This is on a 993, but it's the same in front as the 964 as far as I know-


Is there an advantage to flipping the a-arms over and swapping the left and right to mount the ball joint above the a-arm? Does it even matter?
Old 11-20-2013, 02:34 PM
  #2  
Vandit
Nordschleife Master
 
Vandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Wow, good catch. Never seen it done like that. It would be interesting to hear what folks like Bill Verburg and perelet say about this.

As far as swapping the arms, there's no need for that. Both arms are identical. You would have to flip the pressed bolt/stud on the arm tho. So I guess if you're already removing the arms, swapping them side-to-side would be easier than pressing the pin out and back in going the other way.
Old 11-20-2013, 08:11 PM
  #3  
AOW162435
Seared
Rennlist Member
 
AOW162435's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 16,756
Received 407 Likes on 229 Posts
Default

Every one of the dozens I've seen or worked on were mounted as per the diagram shown.



Andreas
Old 11-20-2013, 08:59 PM
  #4  
sundog
Race Director
 
sundog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 17,585
Received 197 Likes on 105 Posts
Default

Never mind.
Old 11-21-2013, 09:12 AM
  #5  
ThomasC2
Drifting
 
ThomasC2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 2,132
Received 41 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Mounted as in the picture, doesn't it make the upriight sit higher. Meaning that the tie rod comes even higher, meaning that bump steer gets even worse? Mounted as in the PET diagram must be better. Or?!

Thomas
Old 11-21-2013, 09:42 AM
  #6  
Vandit
Nordschleife Master
 
Vandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

What governs the height of the upright and tie-rod is above the carrier since the strut/spring attach to the carrier not the arm. Doing this change would not affect the car's ride height, but given the same ride height, the change would benefit the geometry equivalent to running a slightly higher ride height.

Flipping the ball joint as pictured would have a roll center correcting effect equivalent to however much the difference in a-arm position is between the lower and upper ball joint installation configuration.

More technical discussion on the topic.
http://www.meganracing.com/tech/faqs...ct=Suspension:
Old 11-21-2013, 09:52 AM
  #7  
ToSi
Burning Brakes
 
ToSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 893
Received 82 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

No, unless the attachment point to the upright is moved, i.e. ball joint up or down vs. wheel center, there will be no affect on RC or steering geometry. The arm can be shaped like a pretzel, the only thing that matters is the relative location of the pivots..

Angling the arm down like that might provide a bit more clearance to the tub just above the front bushing, protect the caster adjuster, or they just got them mixed up. Someone should ask Patrick, while the rest of us place our bets
Old 11-21-2013, 10:25 AM
  #8  
Vandit
Nordschleife Master
 
Vandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ToSi
Angling the arm down like that might provide a bit more clearance to the tub just above the front bushing, protect the caster adjuster,
Think this through. Doing this change would do nothing to affect ride height, or clearance for the tub, or clearance for any sprung weight on the car.

Doing this change would reduce clearance for the brake scoops since they are mounted to the arm and the side of the arm closest to the wheel would be in a lower position.
Old 01-05-2014, 11:53 PM
  #9  
Vandit
Nordschleife Master
 
Vandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

I just thought about this thread while looking at pics of my lower control arms removed from the car.

This alteration in suspension setup can be achieved without having to remove the pressed stud from the lower control arms. Instead, just swap the lower control arms between sides, and that in itself will put the pressed stud facing the opposite direction (upward) and allow you to run the ball joint in the above position.

EDIT: Just realized I said ^this^ in my first reply.

Last edited by Vandit; 01-06-2014 at 12:31 AM.
Old 03-21-2014, 01:49 PM
  #10  
Vandit
Nordschleife Master
 
Vandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

I actually sent Patrick Motorsport a Facebook message and a link to this thread some time back, but I never heard back from them.


I still think it's a way to ever so slightly improve the car's roll center geometry and dial out bump steer when running at low low ride height.
Old 03-21-2014, 04:17 PM
  #11  
dimma man
Instructor
 
dimma man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I emailed him yesterday and no answer yet.
Old 03-21-2014, 06:53 PM
  #12  
kos11-12
Three Wheelin'
 
kos11-12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London UK & Paris FR
Posts: 1,699
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

maybe it puts the wishbone more parallel to the tie rod assembly so they move into a more or less the same arc of circle, therefore improve geo and bump steer (on compression & rebound)
Old 03-22-2014, 02:49 AM
  #13  
ttAmerica RoadsterAWD
Three Wheelin'
 
ttAmerica RoadsterAWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Eagle, ID
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Maybe you get more Caster this way???
Old 01-27-2017, 09:17 PM
  #14  
Porschenut_Lee
Pro
 
Porschenut_Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Bump. Anyone running this mod to further reduce bump steer? I'm getting ready to remove control arms for refurbish and might consider going this route.
Old 01-28-2017, 01:01 AM
  #15  
Vandit
Nordschleife Master
 
Vandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Contact this guy and ask.
http://emotionengineering.co

He setup Spyerx's car and put the ball joint above the control arm.


Quick Reply: Ball joint- above or below a-arm?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:30 AM.