Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

10 years ago...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-2016, 09:34 AM
  #31  
hot-J
Three Wheelin'
 
hot-J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,559
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I owned a modded 135 (bought to replace turbo s), now own a modded 1M. Stupid fast, but a 951 is still the better engineered car.
Old 04-19-2016, 09:37 AM
  #32  
LFA951
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
LFA951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SFL
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lart951
and here is a picture of LFA951 with his sissy girl I35
Actually this fresh selfie is me, exclusively just for you Luis Artiga 951
Old 04-19-2016, 09:50 AM
  #33  
LFA951
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
LFA951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SFL
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hot-J
I owned a modded 135 (bought to replace turbo s), now own a modded 1M. Stupid fast, but a 951 is still the better engineered car.
30 year old technology better engineered? What a ridiculous thing to say, so distributor cap and rotors are also better than todays technology too!
Old 04-19-2016, 06:52 PM
  #34  
jmj951
Pro
 
jmj951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: This changes a lot.
Posts: 726
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LFA951
Sounds like your personal experience!
Not me personally, no. Married for 18 years and counting.
Old 04-19-2016, 06:55 PM
  #35  
jmj951
Pro
 
jmj951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: This changes a lot.
Posts: 726
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LFA951
30 year old technology better engineered? What a ridiculous thing to say, so distributor cap and rotors are also better than todays technology too!
He didn't say better technology, he said a better engineered car. It's probably more about the total driving experience than the sum of separate parts, so it will always be debatable.
Old 04-19-2016, 09:02 PM
  #36  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

I don't get this thread...must be getting old.
Old 04-19-2016, 09:18 PM
  #37  
hot-J
Three Wheelin'
 
hot-J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,559
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default 10 years ago...

Originally Posted by jmj951
He didn't say better technology, he said a better engineered car. It's probably more about the total driving experience than the sum of separate parts, so it will always be debatable.
Originally Posted by LFA951
30 year old technology better engineered? What a ridiculous thing to say, so distributor cap and rotors are also better than todays technology too!
Yes, jmj951, thank you for reading my post, instead of reading into it.
A problem is the 1 series inherent instability at speed. All of them, the 1M included. The 951 does not have that problem.
You cannot drive hard with the 1's like a 951 and expect it not to break. The 951 however will endure.
The 951 is better balanced.
The 1 series is not a sports car like the 944, and is flawed by design.
Old 04-19-2016, 09:26 PM
  #38  
LFA951
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
LFA951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SFL
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jmj951
He didn't say better technology, he said a better engineered car. It's probably more about the total driving experience than the sum of separate parts, so it will always be debatable.
Engineering is based on technology and innovation involved in creating the finished product based on the latest resources available, thats why cars are more computerized now and there are more sensors in the engine and fault codes on DME that show more precise and accurate information with scanners, thats why we use timing chains instead of belts
Old 04-19-2016, 09:28 PM
  #39  
hot-J
Three Wheelin'
 
hot-J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,559
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default




Photo for posterity.
Old 04-19-2016, 09:33 PM
  #40  
hot-J
Three Wheelin'
 
hot-J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,559
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I never mentioned the engine. Nor was I talking about it. I was talking about the better engineered performance car. I have 15+ years seat time in stock to 400+whp 951's. I owned a modded 135i and currently own a modded 1M. I am not talking arbitrarily. Owners experience.
Old 04-19-2016, 09:39 PM
  #41  
LFA951
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
LFA951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SFL
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hot-J



Photo for posterity.
Nice, black is always prestigious
Old 04-19-2016, 09:45 PM
  #42  
951and944S
Race Car
 
951and944S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New Orleans/Baton Rouge
Posts: 3,930
Received 65 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Not throwing gas on either side's fire but, owned the 944 series cars since 1990.

Bought my daughter a 330i, sport package, MT when she turned 17.

I've had to do quite a few repairs to the BMW, now with about 120k on the clock.

By comparison, about 8 years ago, I happened upon an abandoned 1987 944NA at a wrecker impound that was towed from side of the road with a flat tire and damaged wheel that the owner never even bothered to retrieve. Tow service owner acquired ownership via storage fees and I paid him $500 for it.
120k on the clock so I pulled the cylinder head and had it freshened (same stock 1987 bottom end today except for two rod bearing changes) and turned it into a DE car for my son. He DE'd for a year, got his Porsche racing license and had done 45 PCA races with the car until it was totalled at Hallet by an errant 911 driver 5th on a grid of 45 cars.
The engine still sits on a furniture rolling dolly ready to go back into service if his current race engine fails. Same for the transmission....1 set of synchros.

A "maintenance" item for the BMW at 100k (unless you have already been stranded on the road) consists of
Radiator, radiator expansion tank, all coolant hoses, water pump, water pump pulley (made of plastic composite) all front pulleys and rollers.

LOL, compared to Porsche, my own personal joke around my house is - BMW = plastic Porsche.

T
Old 04-19-2016, 09:48 PM
  #43  
hot-J
Three Wheelin'
 
hot-J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,559
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I get your point. And I agree that the N54 is a phenomenal engine. There's a reason they kept it for the 1M instead of going with the current N55. Plus, I picked up the 135i in the first place for all the reasons you stated on the first page. If you guys think these cars are good, you should pick up a Cayman S. Better than both, and the best performance bargain currently on the market imho. That should **** someone off....lol
Old 04-20-2016, 02:05 AM
  #44  
George D
Drifting
 
George D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tucson and Greer Arizona
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

In her? Nikasil bores, Wossner pistons and rods, stand alone EMS, solid lifters, list is long - consistent high 400+ whp/tq with ****ty California 91 pump and meth injection. Owner, Jeff, still brings her to our annual sports car trip to my place in Greer, AZ. Fast - well sorted 951.

Originally Posted by blade7
What else was in the motor beside being a 3.0 . I look at cars like the 135 and TT-RS and wonder how they would compare to a 350 bhp 944T ?
Old 04-20-2016, 02:15 AM
  #45  
George D
Drifting
 
George D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tucson and Greer Arizona
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

350 BPH 951 - flywheel? If so, in these cars easily done. My favorite past "HOT" 2.5 dyno sheet attached. This car drove better than the dyno chart. Stock injectors, stock cam, old school chips with MAF, downpipe only, etc. Very little lag with the K27/6 KKK factory stock turbo.

Notice the date of the dyno - back then, don't recall any cars accelerating faster once moving.
Attached Images
File Type: pdf
89 2.5 dyno chart.pdf (638.2 KB, 135 views)


Quick Reply: 10 years ago...



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:07 AM.