Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Motor Mounts...anyone try these?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-21-2015, 11:09 PM
  #16  
fiily
Pro
Thread Starter
 
fiily's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: New Hampshire Highways
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
they certainly look stout...well-made by appearances.
wondering what shipping from Polska to US is...

on another note, the 928 guys have a similar situation to us - Genuine mounts are nuts expensive, aftermarkets are mostly crap...they have their own semi-solids...they found that a Volvo and Ford engine mount work perfectly in their applications and are super cheap...i'd like to see if there is something similar for us
Spencer,

If you ever find a solution, you should be enshrined in the Rennlist 944 hall of fame for saving us all lots of $$$$ on motor mounts.
Old 05-21-2015, 11:13 PM
  #17  
fiily
Pro
Thread Starter
 
fiily's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: New Hampshire Highways
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sherry66
Hi, I purchsed a set of these and while they seem well made and good quality , the bolt would not fit through the aluminium engine mounts without enlarging the holes which I did not wish to do, so they went to the back of the garage to try another day and put some lindsey mounts on instead.
Did you try a different set of bolts? For the price savings, I don't mind scrounging around graingers/hardware store to find the correct pitch/thread to make these work.

From my understanding, new mounts sometimes require new hardware( you have to measure), did you ask the seller if they provide or know what is recommended for hardware?
Old 05-22-2015, 12:51 AM
  #18  
Thesnowman
Intermediate
 
Thesnowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fiily
Which one's, the Genuine Porsche one's don't look cheap to me.
Middle ones, 951.375.042.04a which look to be Meyle
Old 05-22-2015, 01:02 AM
  #19  
mikey_audiogeek
Three Wheelin'
 
mikey_audiogeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,547
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Voith
Rein mounts are OE porsche mounts with porsche numbers and sign ground off with hand tool. All else is 100% identical.

https://rennlist.com/forums/924-931-...l#post11685877
Hi Voith,
Is it possible they are reject mounts that don't meet Porsche specification?

(next question: does it matter?)

I'm not as brave as you. I wouldn't claim that they ARE 100% identical, just that they APPEAR 100% identical.

I've got a Rolex like that...

Cheers,
Mike
Old 05-22-2015, 03:04 AM
  #20  
Voith
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Voith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,385
Received 646 Likes on 408 Posts
Default

They might be rejects, but they certainly were made on the exact same tooling and had factory numbers and porsche logo on it.

Im not sure porsche would test each mount and reject some, after all it is a rubber cast filled with oil. If it holds oil it should be good.

Usually the technology used on a part is a property of some company that porsche choosed to buy from. These companies have their own selling channels beside the OE customers but the problem is that porsche PN and logo are porsche property.

So they sell their tech since it is their in the first place, but must erase porsche logos off.

It happens with a lot of VW/Audi/Porsche parts, I recently bought electronic thermostat for audi from Behr and it had VW number erased with dremel or similar tool(some numbers were still visible under certain light angle), everything else 100% same as OE part I removed.
Old 05-22-2015, 07:14 AM
  #21  
George D
Drifting
 
George D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tucson and Greer Arizona
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
is the black part rubber or plastic or something?
Looks like urethane, nightmare with this application, but don't know from the pictures. Also resembles a cutting board dyed black. Got this material on the bottom of my splitter. Works great!
Old 05-22-2015, 09:19 AM
  #22  
Jay Wellwood
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Jay Wellwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hotlanta - NE of the Perimeter
Posts: 12,269
Received 267 Likes on 154 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
they certainly look stout...well-made by appearances.
wondering what shipping from Polska to US is...

on another note, the 928 guys have a similar situation to us - Genuine mounts are nuts expensive, aftermarkets are mostly crap...they have their own semi-solids...they found that a Volvo and Ford engine mount work perfectly in their applications and are super cheap...i'd like to see if there is something similar for us
Used the Ford mounts in my gone, but not forgotten 928. My experience was that while they were a direct replacement from a fitment perspective, they didn't last a year.
Old 05-22-2015, 09:53 AM
  #23  
fiily
Pro
Thread Starter
 
fiily's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: New Hampshire Highways
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by George D
Looks like urethane, nightmare with this application, but don't know from the pictures. Also resembles a cutting board dyed black. Got this material on the bottom of my splitter. Works great!
I have emailed the seller to find out what the black part is made of.
Old 05-22-2015, 10:19 AM
  #24  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,497
Received 632 Likes on 490 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jay Wellwood
Used the Ford mounts in my gone, but not forgotten 928. My experience was that while they were a direct replacement from a fitment perspective, they didn't last a year.
The Ford truck or Ford Tempo mount?
Old 05-22-2015, 10:44 AM
  #25  
DLS
Racer
 
DLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 485
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Someone in sweden bought a pair of the mounts from poland and his was 1,5cm too high so he had to modify them.

I made my mounts using parts of the old mount and a new volvo 240 diesel (stiffer material) rubber engine mount
http://www1.garaget.org/gallery/arch...058_z0c4wf.jpg
Old 05-22-2015, 11:08 AM
  #26  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,497
Received 632 Likes on 490 Posts
Default

Thats sweet!
How does it feel for transmitting vibrations?
Old 05-22-2015, 04:25 PM
  #27  
alxdgr8
Rennlist Member
 
alxdgr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,803
Received 52 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paulyy
the vibration in your engine shouldn't change. It's the vibration in the chassis the motor mounts stop.
Not correct. It's a system, and things vibrate differently depending on the boundary conditions (mounting). So if you change the boundary conditions of a vibrating object, you are indeed changing the vibratory modes of that object along with any transfer paths to the mounting object. So, by changing engine mounts you can introduce changes in forces that are seen on the engine structure along with parts mounted to it (fuel rail, oil pickup, etc.) and you're changing the amount of vibration that is transferred to the chassis.
Just make sure you have your balance shafts are timed correctly and you should be fine with semi-solid mounts.
Old 05-22-2015, 07:07 PM
  #28  
mikey_audiogeek
Three Wheelin'
 
mikey_audiogeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,547
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Voith
They might be rejects, but they certainly were made on the exact same tooling and had factory numbers and porsche logo on it.

Im not sure porsche would test each mount and reject some, after all it is a rubber cast filled with oil. If it holds oil it should be good.

Usually the technology used on a part is a property of some company that porsche choosed to buy from. These companies have their own selling channels beside the OE customers but the problem is that porsche PN and logo are porsche property.

So they sell their tech since it is their in the first place, but must erase porsche logos off.

It happens with a lot of VW/Audi/Porsche parts, I recently bought electronic thermostat for audi from Behr and it had VW number erased with dremel or similar tool(some numbers were still visible under certain light angle), everything else 100% same as OE part I removed.
Good discussion.

It wouldn't be Porsche testing them, it would be done by the manufacturer as per the contract.

This is quite common. Think aircraft bolts.

The engine mounts are filled with oil because they provide damping, same as the shock absorbers on your car.

It is possible that Porsche requires performance tests for the OE mounts - which can be why OE parts are more expensive. Think aircraft bolts again. You pay extra for assured performance and tighter quality control.

Porsche, like most car manufacturers, have a contract with their suppliers which specifies that the supplier cannot on-sell parts of the same quality/performance that they supply to Porsche.

Often this means that the supplier can only on-sell a previous version of a part, once it has been superceded.

So for any Porsche part number that has the last digit (revision status) higher than 1, you cannot be sure that the OEM part is current spec.

This is certainly the case with 951/944S2 brake discs. None of the "OEM" or aftermarket discs match or copy the latest Porsche version. And the latest Porsche version has a number of key performance advances over the earlier version.

Lotus twin cam engine blocks were made on the same production line as basic Ford blocks, in the same batches with the Ford blocks, identical production process, indistinguishable to the naked eye.

Yet every Lotus/Ford nut knows why the Lotus blocks are better for a high performance engine build, and hence why they are now 50 times the price...

Cheers,
Mike
Old 05-22-2015, 07:16 PM
  #29  
mikey_audiogeek
Three Wheelin'
 
mikey_audiogeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,547
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Info here about hydraulic motor mount design, testing, and quality control.

http://www.sandv.com/downloads/0207sin2.pdf
Old 05-22-2015, 07:59 PM
  #30  
Voith
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Voith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,385
Received 646 Likes on 408 Posts
Default

Interesting pdf, it is a complete science as with most parts.

I believe it is possible that the rein mount either really didn't pass strict testing procedure, or it indeed is the exact same part as porsche boxed ones.

If the composition of all materials and production methods are 100% the same and some of these products fall slightly under the margins set by porsche, it is still probably better than all copies, will last close to the original and costs half of the factory part.

The other option is this loophole affair, described by pelican CEO, could be it even sheds light on the reason for lack of rein 944 mounts lately:

Originally Posted by Wayne at Pelican
Hi Guys. I would like to apologize for the confusion here - there unfortunately is no simple answer. I will try to add some clarity however.

Let's start by discussing the OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturers) that sell to the car manufacturers (Porsche, BMW, Mercedes, etc.). They produce many parts for them for use on new vehicles. I believe this where most of their revenue tends to come from. In addition, they also supply parts for the replacement parts supply chain within the manufacturers dealer network. I.E. they produce parts for Porsche that Porsche then places in their "Genuine Porsche " boxes and sells to their dealers as replacement parts. This business is also lucrative for the OEM manufacturers.

Then, there's the third chain, the one that Pelican taps into (to save everyone money). This is where the OEM manufacturers sell parts directly to Pelican and our suppliers. Sometimes there are contracts that these OEM manufacturers have with the manufacturer (Porsche) that detail that they cannot sell the exact same part through the third channel (outside of the control of Porsche). So, the OEM manufacturer may use many different tricks and loopholes to get around these restrictions. As a side note too, sometimes the OEM manufacturer doesn't even want the car manufacturer (Porsche) to know they are stuffing these parts out the back channel - in reality, sometimes it's difficult to tell where these come from if you're an end-consumer.

So, this is the case with these motor mounts. Rein is a distributor of German parts - they buy parts from the OEM manufacturer and then box them in their own "Rein" branded boxes. This would be the same as if Pelican bought parts in bulk from an OEM manufacturer in Europe and then "reboxed" them into a Pelican box. The mounts are manufactured by a company that is a subsidiary of CFW/Corteco. This company's name (which I have been asked not to post publicly) starts with a "V", and that is why the markings show that.

So, why do the parts not have an OEM part number? Because the manufacturers (Porsche especially) have trademarked their part numbering system and do not allow aftermarket parts to include that part number. It's way more complicated than that, but that's the gist of it. It's also why you might often see a part come in a box that looks brand new, but has a Porsche or BMW logo that was cast into the part - that casting is sometimes ground off. The reason why is because these parts were manufactured using the same molds and tooling used for the Porsche part, but the trademark needs be removed before it can enter the "alternative distribution channel".

Sorry for all the cloak-and-dagger stuff, but getting parts through these channels keeps the aftermarket and companies like Pelican alive and thriving. We can sell the same part from the same manufacturing line as the Genuine part, often for 1/3 the cost or less. Having to deal with these little confusion issues has been something that we've been working with for the past 15 years, and it's just part of the business. In general, it's not something that we like to see discussed in length on discussion boards because it can spook the manufacturers sometimes (this has indeed happened in the past).

I hope this helps to clarify, and thanks everyone for your continued support!

-Wayne

P.S. Pls forgive the "new user" account - my old account was converted over to our Pelican Sponsor account...

Wayne R. Dempsey
CEO, Pelican Parts Inc.

https://rennlist.com/forums/993-foru...l#post10522369


Quick Reply: Motor Mounts...anyone try these?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:10 PM.