Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

RT Head Heater Hose Adaptor Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-12-2016, 10:25 AM
  #1  
Chris Lockhart
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Chris Lockhart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Taylors, S.C.
Posts: 2,150
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default RT Head Heater Hose Adaptor Question

I have 2 adaptors, and am unsure of which one would be better to use. They are: 928 104 713 2R (which is a one piece cast unit with an ID of .535")

and: 928 104 713 OR (Which is two piece with a pressed in nipple that has an ID of .580")

Is there any benefit of one over the other? I am conflicted because the 2 piece appears that it would flow more, yet being 2 piece yields an extra failure point. The one piece eliminates that issue but all the way through is a smaller ID and doesn't appear that it would flow as well. I'm probably over thinking it, but I figured I'd ask anyway.
Attached Images  
Old 12-12-2016, 10:29 AM
  #2  
Chris Lockhart
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Chris Lockhart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Taylors, S.C.
Posts: 2,150
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Another view: 2R on the Left, OR on the Right.
Attached Images  
Old 12-12-2016, 04:50 PM
  #3  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 545 Likes on 408 Posts
Default

How much of a flow improvement are looking for? It's the heater-core loop after all. Use the newer one.
Old 12-12-2016, 06:59 PM
  #4  
Mrmerlin
Team Owner
 
Mrmerlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Philly PA
Posts: 27,870
Received 2,243 Likes on 1,241 Posts
Default

I would use the single part ,
the two piece has been known to slide apart.
It can be fixed by JB welding the parts together
Old 12-12-2016, 07:10 PM
  #5  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,322
Received 1,542 Likes on 1,006 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mrmerlin
I would use the single part ,
+1
Old 12-12-2016, 07:54 PM
  #6  
ROG100
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
ROG100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Double Oak, TX
Posts: 16,815
Received 829 Likes on 325 Posts
Default

+2 +3 +4
__________________

Does it have the "Do It Yourself" manual transmission, or the superior "Fully Equipped by Porsche" Automatic Transmission? George Layton March 2014

928 Owners are ".....a secret sect of quietly assured Porsche pragmatists who in near anonymity appreciate the prodigious, easy going prowess of the 928."






Old 12-13-2016, 10:06 AM
  #7  
Chris Lockhart
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Chris Lockhart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Taylors, S.C.
Posts: 2,150
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Thanks guys. That was my thought as well, but I wanted confirmation.
Old 12-13-2016, 10:54 AM
  #8  
davek9
Rennlist Member
 
davek9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bloomfield, MI
Posts: 5,111
Received 324 Likes on 177 Posts
Default

I've never seen the all cast part, guessing its from an early car and they went to the Steel insert due to pitting of the casting over time?
Old 12-13-2016, 07:35 PM
  #9  
outbackgeorgia
Pro
 
outbackgeorgia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Atlanta GA metro, OTP North
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have used both, but the pressed in tube fell out and dumped coolant, so replaced it with the single piece part from 928 International. Should not have corrosion if coolant is properly maintained.
Dave
Old 01-22-2017, 02:24 AM
  #10  
scottw383
Rennlist Member
 
scottw383's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Washington state
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here's another vote for the one piece design.


My 87 developed a coolant leak a few weeks ago -- I traced it down to where the short hose attaches to this part. The hose on my car was apparently replaced with a short piece of standard heater hose at some point in the past -- it wasn't the Porsche part. I tried tightening the hose clamps on the hose as a stop-gap measure and ordered a new short hose. Tightening the clamp seemed to help -- the leak stopped...for about a week, then it came back.


I replaced the hose with the correct Porsche part, started the car and let it get up to temp. (I couldn't drive the car -- the driveway was still iced over from the snow and ice the Portland/Vancouver area had received a few days earlier.) At first it seemed to be leak-free, but there were a couple of drips on the floor after several minutes. OK, problem NOT solved.


I had a look at the fitting and the short hose, and sure enough it was seeping. I had a good look at the hose clamps -- still tight. I wiggled the hose a bit and noticed that the fitting in the adaptor appeared to be moving a bit. After pulling on it a little bit more the tube started to separate from the cast aluminum housing (the hose was flush with the housing before):





After pulling a little more, coolant started flooding out:








And finally the part completely separated:







It really was not difficult to separate the parts once it started to let go. I'm very glad that it didn't suddenly burst apart when driving due to the cooling system pressure, but it certainly could have.


Suffice it to say that I ordered a new single-piece part from Roger at 928sRUs and I'll be installing it next weekend when I have the time to work on the car.


Just showing what CAN happen to the two piece part. And I'm definitely a fan of the one piece design...one less failure/leak point.
Old 01-22-2017, 02:44 AM
  #11  
Rob Edwards
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
 
Rob Edwards's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 17,307
Received 2,549 Likes on 1,233 Posts
Default

This two-piece coolant pipe insert thing was beta tested on the 928, and they worked so well they use 8 such 2-piece hose inserts on the 996 Turbo. Ask those owners how that worked out....
Old 01-22-2017, 09:34 AM
  #12  
outbackgeorgia
Pro
 
outbackgeorgia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Atlanta GA metro, OTP North
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

One less point of failure, no downside.
Old 01-23-2017, 10:24 AM
  #13  
Chris Lockhart
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Chris Lockhart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Taylors, S.C.
Posts: 2,150
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Definitely a bad design. Thanks for showing what CAN happen Scott.
Old 01-23-2017, 08:51 PM
  #14  
scottw383
Rennlist Member
 
scottw383's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Washington state
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Agreed!


As a mechanical engineer I never would have designed that relatively simple part as a two-piece assembly, especially given the harsh environment that is going to have to live in: large temp swings, vibration, pressurized fluid, the possibility of corrosion from inside, etc. I wouldn't expect either a press fit or an adhesive to hold up over the long haul in that environment. And guess what? It doesn't...
Old 01-23-2017, 11:33 PM
  #15  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 545 Likes on 408 Posts
Default

I think it's a -great- idea to put a thin steel sleeve into an aluminum housing, then heat it up and cool it down under internal pressure. There's surely lots of interference in the fit, so the faster-expanding aluminum stays nice and tight around the steel. What could go wrong?

There are plenty of adhesives that would do the job these days. Bad news is that they weren't around when the parts were made originally.

Rob-- 993 guys snicker at the fittings that the 996 guys use, i'm sure.


The real street-race crowd has everything mached from billet. They may be on to something.



Quick Reply: RT Head Heater Hose Adaptor Question



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:37 PM.