Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Wheel question...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-26-2016, 12:08 AM
  #1  
Speedtoys
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Speedtoys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 13,582
Received 1,034 Likes on 623 Posts
Default Wheel question...

I suck on wheel sizing..7x17 ET55 front and 9x17 ET55 rear Cup II wheels on an 85 or an S4.

Good, bad, passable?

Comparing to stock 85 wheels for sure.
Old 07-26-2016, 12:33 AM
  #2  
The Forgotten On
Rennlist Member
 
The Forgotten On's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Thousand Oaks California
Posts: 4,931
Received 298 Likes on 246 Posts
Default

Passable. It will give you a 0 scrub radius though.
Old 07-26-2016, 12:33 AM
  #3  
Speedtoys
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Speedtoys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 13,582
Received 1,034 Likes on 623 Posts
Default

Wassat mean?
Old 07-26-2016, 01:00 AM
  #4  
Speedtoys
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Speedtoys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 13,582
Received 1,034 Likes on 623 Posts
Default

Trying to make the RIGHT sense of this.

S4 wants +65 front, +52.3 rear, from:
http://www.928registry.org/928-resou...ic/wheel-guide

A broader set of wheel data..
http://members.rennlist.com/flyingdo...%20Fitment.htm

If I add a 10mm spacer up front, does that make the 993 front wheel now +65mm?
And leave the rear alone?
Old 07-26-2016, 01:31 AM
  #5  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,453
Received 2,072 Likes on 1,183 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Speedtoys
If I add a 10mm spacer up front, does that make the 993 front wheel now +65mm?
And leave the rear alone?
Just the opposite, that will make them an et45.

Bigger number = wheel's move inward. Adding a spacer moves them out, the opposite of what you need.

I have et52 8x17's on the 87 right now. No issues so a 7" wide et55 will fit fine up front.
Old 07-26-2016, 01:38 AM
  #6  
Speedtoys
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Speedtoys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 13,582
Received 1,034 Likes on 623 Posts
Default

Ok...I was afraid I was backwards, thank you.

Mostly this is for the kid's car, her 85. And I don't want to introduce a performance issue for her.
Old 07-26-2016, 01:52 AM
  #7  
The Forgotten On
Rennlist Member
 
The Forgotten On's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Thousand Oaks California
Posts: 4,931
Received 298 Likes on 246 Posts
Default

As far as for our cars the higher the offset the better. The more positive scrub radius we have on the front the less of a chance our cars will tramline and become twitchy.

That is why we got +10 scrub from the factory, at least for the pre 86.5 cars. Not sure about S4's though.

I run Panamera rims on both of mine and they have an offset of 59 in the front (the lowest the 928 ever got from the factory was 60) so they have no real tramlining issues.

A lot of people run Carrera rims which have an offset of 50 in the front and some have reported tramlining issues because they now have a negative scrub radius.
Old 07-26-2016, 01:52 AM
  #8  
jcorenman
Rennlist Member
 
jcorenman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Friday Harbor, WA
Posts: 4,041
Received 292 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Speedtoys
Ok...I was afraid I was backwards, thank you.

Mostly this is for the kid's car, her 85. And I don't want to introduce a performance issue for her.
ET65 Cup-IIs are harder to find, but the right answer for the 928. They are also 7.5" wide, a better fit for 225/45 x 17 tires.

Originally Posted by The Forgotten On
...That is why we got +10 scrub from the factory, at least for the pre 86.5 cars. Not sure about S4's though.
Same. Stock 16" wheels were ET65, club-sports were ET60-- which I believe was the smallest offset that Porsche ever fit to a 928. We ran ET52 Mille Miglia 18" on the front of our GT for a few years and about 60K miles, tramlining was a bit worse but could be compensated by increasing toe-in a bit... Not ideal, and they stuck out a bit more than I liked.
Old 07-26-2016, 01:58 AM
  #9  
zekgb
Three Wheelin'
 
zekgb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hollister, CA
Posts: 1,794
Received 41 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The Forgotten On
As far as for our cars the higher the offset the better. The more positive scrub radius we have on the front the less of a chance our cars will tramline and become twitchy.

That is why we got +10 scrub from the factory, at least for the pre 86.5 cars. Not sure about S4's though.

I run Panamera rims on both of mine and they have an offset of 59 in the front (the lowest the 928 ever got from the factory was 60) so they have no real tramlining issues.

A lot of people run Carrera rims which have an offset of 50 in the front and some have reported tramlining issues because they now have a negative scrub radius.
I believe this is backwards, stock suspension and ET65 wheels provide -10 scrub radius and moving to ET55 gets you to zero.
Old 07-26-2016, 02:07 AM
  #10  
Speedtoys
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Speedtoys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 13,582
Received 1,034 Likes on 623 Posts
Default

She can deal with the tramlining, my C3 wheels do it some at a 57mm offset, and she drives that fine.

Rears, seem close enough, and she ends up with way better tire choices.
Old 07-26-2016, 02:46 AM
  #11  
FredR
Rennlist Member
 
FredR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oman
Posts: 9,706
Received 666 Likes on 543 Posts
Default

When it comes to negative scrub radius we are seemingly talking about "fine margins"- the difference between "good" and "better" as it were.

For a while I ran with a set of 18 inch off takes with ET52, looked good, filled the wheel well nicely and no real issues- until I did a bit of auto-cross type driving wherein the thing really seemed to struggle compared to an earlier 928S a friend was driving. Decided to sell the things there and then to a friend who had a 911 - a win win scenario.

Cannot compare the wheels to that I replaced them with as they are a different kettle of fish altogether but with plenty of front ET at 68mm and plenty of rubber capability.

The research I did suggested that the worst thing you can do is run with zero NSR in that a positive scrub radius is better than "zero scrub radius"- I cannot verify this - just commenting on my research.

I concluded that Porsche knew exactly what they were doing when specifying the wheels/suspension design and decided to stick with the design principals they mandated. I tweak the suspension/alignment for [hopefully] optimal cornering capability and I am satisfied it works enhancing the original design. No tramlining issues, no other issues other than perhaps knocking out the front suspension a bit earlier than might have otherwise been - performance that made factory instructors take notice up at Dubai Autodrome.

Does NSR have any safety connotations for day to day driving?- a difficult one to answer with any certainty but probably "yes" when driving in performance mode. The 928 always seems to have a "bit more up its sleeve" when you need it most which is usually in the middle of a brain fade moment or a "self inflicted" crisis.

IMHO not a good idea to mess around negatively with Porsche's very advanced suspension design intent- improve it or stick with the stock design but do not go backwards. My personal point of view.

Rgds

Fred
Old 07-26-2016, 03:35 PM
  #12  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Fred, there is no bettter feeling than big meats on wide rims that go to the end of the fender widths. (the only limit )
those rims that speedtoys is considering will fit fine.
dont worry, the 225 fits nicey on the 7s and you can then use a 245 or 255 on the rear.
Old 07-26-2016, 09:48 PM
  #13  
Jim Chambers
Pro
 
Jim Chambers's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Here are a couple of sites that could be helpful.

http://www.rimsntires.com/specspro.jsp

http://www.1010tires.com/Tools/Wheel-Offset-Calculator
Old 07-27-2016, 06:28 PM
  #14  
anonymousagain
Rennlist Member
 
anonymousagain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NorCal - Bay Area
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Speedtoys, FWIW my 86 (with factory 10mm spacer) fits perfect to fender w/out rubbing using 7x17 ET55 and 9x17 ET50, 235/45/17 and 275/40/17 respectively (for similar diameter match).
Old 07-27-2016, 06:38 PM
  #15  
Speedtoys
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Speedtoys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 13,582
Received 1,034 Likes on 623 Posts
Default

Thanks.



Quick Reply: Wheel question...



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:02 AM.