Worn GT Cams - Can they be fixed?
#31
Pro
The stock lifter is very heavy. The increase in rpms along with a more aggressive cam profile allowed minor valve float.
The wear always starts on the "backside" of the lobe, where the lifter "lands" after loosing contact with the lobe.
GTS models also suffer from this same problem.
Cure with slightly stiffer springs and/or lighter lifters and/or DLC coating on lifters.....after you solve the pitting problems.
The wear always starts on the "backside" of the lobe, where the lifter "lands" after loosing contact with the lobe.
GTS models also suffer from this same problem.
Cure with slightly stiffer springs and/or lighter lifters and/or DLC coating on lifters.....after you solve the pitting problems.
Somewhere I've seen an article mentioning titanium lifters, plus other bits like titanium keepers and collets. Think they may have mentioned Ti valves too.
They did calculations that showed the reduction in timing belt tension (and therefore HP recovered) by the use of lightweight reciprocating pieces.
Seriously tempting, but alas, the cost was measured in cubic dollars.
#32
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mostly in my workshop located in Sweden.
Posts: 2,226
Received 442 Likes
on
244 Posts
Speedtalk about DLC coated lifters. Simard´s cams were made of steel - right?
Åke
http://speedtalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=33940
Åke
http://speedtalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=33940
#33
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mostly in my workshop located in Sweden.
Posts: 2,226
Received 442 Likes
on
244 Posts
Solid 35mm DLC coated lifters at a favorable price.
Åke
http://techtonicstuning.com/main/ind...oducts_id=1932
Åke
http://techtonicstuning.com/main/ind...oducts_id=1932
#34
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Speedtalk about DLC coated lifters. Simard´s cams were made of steel - right?
Åke
http://speedtalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=33940
Åke
http://speedtalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=33940
Read that thread. As usual, on the Internet, a lot of people stating "what they have heard" and very few actual people with experience......
The Internet creates experts from idiots, with the push of the "post" button....amazing stuff!
Probably the only person there with firsthand experience had been doing it for many years.
Last edited by GregBBRD; 07-26-2015 at 01:58 PM.
#35
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Thanks Greg.
Somewhere I've seen an article mentioning titanium lifters, plus other bits like titanium keepers and collets. Think they may have mentioned Ti valves too.
They did calculations that showed the reduction in timing belt tension (and therefore HP recovered) by the use of lightweight reciprocating pieces.
Seriously tempting, but alas, the cost was measured in cubic dollars.
Somewhere I've seen an article mentioning titanium lifters, plus other bits like titanium keepers and collets. Think they may have mentioned Ti valves too.
They did calculations that showed the reduction in timing belt tension (and therefore HP recovered) by the use of lightweight reciprocating pieces.
Seriously tempting, but alas, the cost was measured in cubic dollars.
#36
However, as stated, Nissan figured it out with cast cams. Nissan is one OEM that has done well, relatively, with coatings to really get the most out of the engines.
#37
Nordschleife Master
There was no confusion. I asked about DLC on lifters sliding against cast-iron camshafts. It's a difficult application to get right without problems. Steel sliding against DLC is lot easier to get right.
Everyone is free to ridicule others for the sources of their information, but I think there's value in reading the published research papers on the topic. I am not my sister who's got a Ph.D. in material physics, but I do have enough experience reading research papers that I can get information out of them. Not enough to make a call on what coating to use where, but enough information to have an intelligent conversation with someone who works on DLC applications. As of today, my informaiton from maybe five years ago is of course now dated. It's possible that the coatings have improved and/or that the experts now better understand exactly how and where to apply them.
My view on cams, in case anyone cares, is that Simard's steel cams with Mike Jones profiles, modified hydraulic lifters with reduced travel length, steel beehive springs set to load profiles that match the camshaft profiles and the valvetrain mass, and potentially DLC coatings on the lifters is the current gold standard of mechanical camshaft systems for 928s. Getting the valve events right for the application is, however, much, much more important than getting the state of the art mechanical combination. The state of the art mechanical combination will just allow one to reliably run a little more aggressive (i.e., higher acceleration) profiles and to maybe reduce friction losses compared to the standard mechanical combination. I'd want to know exactly what I'll get for the increased peak accelerations (or if these increased limits are even used) before paying say $5000 more for the gold standard mechanical combination. Just my opinion.
Everyone is free to ridicule others for the sources of their information, but I think there's value in reading the published research papers on the topic. I am not my sister who's got a Ph.D. in material physics, but I do have enough experience reading research papers that I can get information out of them. Not enough to make a call on what coating to use where, but enough information to have an intelligent conversation with someone who works on DLC applications. As of today, my informaiton from maybe five years ago is of course now dated. It's possible that the coatings have improved and/or that the experts now better understand exactly how and where to apply them.
My view on cams, in case anyone cares, is that Simard's steel cams with Mike Jones profiles, modified hydraulic lifters with reduced travel length, steel beehive springs set to load profiles that match the camshaft profiles and the valvetrain mass, and potentially DLC coatings on the lifters is the current gold standard of mechanical camshaft systems for 928s. Getting the valve events right for the application is, however, much, much more important than getting the state of the art mechanical combination. The state of the art mechanical combination will just allow one to reliably run a little more aggressive (i.e., higher acceleration) profiles and to maybe reduce friction losses compared to the standard mechanical combination. I'd want to know exactly what I'll get for the increased peak accelerations (or if these increased limits are even used) before paying say $5000 more for the gold standard mechanical combination. Just my opinion.
#38
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mostly in my workshop located in Sweden.
Posts: 2,226
Received 442 Likes
on
244 Posts
Åke
#39
Pro
#40
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
There was no confusion. I asked about DLC on lifters sliding against cast-iron camshafts. It's a difficult application to get right without problems. Steel sliding against DLC is lot easier to get right.
Everyone is free to ridicule others for the sources of their information, but I think there's value in reading the published research papers on the topic. I am not my sister who's got a Ph.D. in material physics, but I do have enough experience reading research papers that I can get information out of them. Not enough to make a call on what coating to use where, but enough information to have an intelligent conversation with someone who works on DLC applications. As of today, my informaiton from maybe five years ago is of course now dated. It's possible that the coatings have improved and/or that the experts now better understand exactly how and where to apply them.
My view on cams, in case anyone cares, is that Simard's steel cams with Mike Jones profiles, modified hydraulic lifters with reduced travel length, steel beehive springs set to load profiles that match the camshaft profiles and the valvetrain mass, and potentially DLC coatings on the lifters is the current gold standard of mechanical camshaft systems for 928s. Getting the valve events right for the application is, however, much, much more important than getting the state of the art mechanical combination. The state of the art mechanical combination will just allow one to reliably run a little more aggressive (i.e., higher acceleration) profiles and to maybe reduce friction losses compared to the standard mechanical combination. I'd want to know exactly what I'll get for the increased peak accelerations (or if these increased limits are even used) before paying say $5000 more for the gold standard mechanical combination. Just my opinion.
Everyone is free to ridicule others for the sources of their information, but I think there's value in reading the published research papers on the topic. I am not my sister who's got a Ph.D. in material physics, but I do have enough experience reading research papers that I can get information out of them. Not enough to make a call on what coating to use where, but enough information to have an intelligent conversation with someone who works on DLC applications. As of today, my informaiton from maybe five years ago is of course now dated. It's possible that the coatings have improved and/or that the experts now better understand exactly how and where to apply them.
My view on cams, in case anyone cares, is that Simard's steel cams with Mike Jones profiles, modified hydraulic lifters with reduced travel length, steel beehive springs set to load profiles that match the camshaft profiles and the valvetrain mass, and potentially DLC coatings on the lifters is the current gold standard of mechanical camshaft systems for 928s. Getting the valve events right for the application is, however, much, much more important than getting the state of the art mechanical combination. The state of the art mechanical combination will just allow one to reliably run a little more aggressive (i.e., higher acceleration) profiles and to maybe reduce friction losses compared to the standard mechanical combination. I'd want to know exactly what I'll get for the increased peak accelerations (or if these increased limits are even used) before paying say $5000 more for the gold standard mechanical combination. Just my opinion.
This forum is about the most expensive street car made in the the 1980s and 1990s. The Honda Civic forum is located somewhere else.....
Back a few years, when brand new GT cams were still available (some of them still are available), a stock set of cams, new lifters, and springs was over $7500, from Porsche.
I bought and used many sets of these cams....using different springs and different lifters, with the cost still being north of $6000.
In comparision, the "gold standard" cost of making very custom pieces with the best reliability possible is an unbelievable bargain.
Just my opinion.
#41
Rennlist Member
HP savings??? man, what a joke... almost as funny as the guy that drops 2 lbs a wheel and thinks he saves a second a lap.....*(until you see the data. )
#42
Rennlist Member
I have a set of S3 Elgin/Jim Morton cams, with chipped teeth from shipping. Roger searched for some for me and we both when they arrived damaged. They are perfect and unused, but at the moment they are nothing more than wall art. I will never throw them out ... but I will also never give up on trying to find a way to fix them.
I have spoken to the best race cam guys here in Australia, and they all tell me that welding would not be a lasting or reliable repair on such a fragile projection, no matter how well it was done or heat treated. One company I spoke to (https://www.harrop.com.au/), who I've dealt with for over 40 years, and make engineering masterpieces, share GB's view.
This is also why I've shown interest in bolt on sprockets .... but the limiting factor, is that the fitment would be pointless if the profile has to be destroyed, to get the sprocket on. Ake's sprocket seems the best, with its standard tooth count, but the cam lobes have to be rebuilt ... which doesn't make sense for a tooth only repair.
Who is the 944 cam guy Mark? Link?
I have spoken to the best race cam guys here in Australia, and they all tell me that welding would not be a lasting or reliable repair on such a fragile projection, no matter how well it was done or heat treated. One company I spoke to (https://www.harrop.com.au/), who I've dealt with for over 40 years, and make engineering masterpieces, share GB's view.
This is also why I've shown interest in bolt on sprockets .... but the limiting factor, is that the fitment would be pointless if the profile has to be destroyed, to get the sprocket on. Ake's sprocket seems the best, with its standard tooth count, but the cam lobes have to be rebuilt ... which doesn't make sense for a tooth only repair.
Who is the 944 cam guy Mark? Link?
#43
Burning Brakes
why mess with old cams with worn lobes and sprockets , sure you can get them reground , if there is still material left . Get a new set of Colins cams like I did , I put my good set of GT cams on a shelf.
#44
Nordschleife Master
Depending on how much and what kind wear they have, it may be possible to simply regrind them to the original spec (or to some other spec). Since the base circle diameter will be reduced, you should probably measure how deep the valve sits in the valve seat and then run lash caps if necessary. If the regrinding will take you past the hardened part of the camshaft surface, then the cams can be nitrided to harden them again (I believe this will give you harder and more durable cams than the factory stock cams, by the way.) While you're at it, you may want to have them grind a slightly different profile if you want more high rpm power, but that is entirely dependent on the rest of the engine and your preferences. Then pair those with the VW hydraulic lifters that Roger sells and you're in my opinion good to go.
In my opinion, reground cams that are nitrided combined with the new, lighter VW hydraulic lifters will match or exceed the reliability of the factory stock GT camshaft system, provided that the lobe is either the GT lobe or some other competently designed lobe with similar aggressiveness.
#45
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mostly in my workshop located in Sweden.
Posts: 2,226
Received 442 Likes
on
244 Posts
Here's what Supertech said:
"I am not sure if can be DLC coated, but a cast cam with a welded hard face like stellite, does not need DLC because these already have a good coefficient of friction and is compatible with most cam followers.
"I am not sure if can be DLC coated, but a cast cam with a welded hard face like stellite, does not need DLC because these already have a good coefficient of friction and is compatible with most cam followers.