Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

CARB Approved Catalytic Converter Solutions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-05-2013, 11:04 PM
  #16  
Ed Scherer
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Ed Scherer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Shawnee, KS, USA
Posts: 7,330
Received 108 Likes on 62 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by dr bob
I get questioned about several things on the car, where inspection is a lot more work than the test guy feels is really needed:

[...]
-- There's no check engine light, in spite of what their book says.
[...]
Oh yeah...?

Take a close look at the right side of the cluster:



... or the corresponding nice white label on the left side of the back side of the cluster PCB:




OK, to be fair, this bulb is actually wasn't factory installed as you can see below before I installed LED replacements, but there obviously was some intent to possibly provide it and it does actually illuminate during the bulb test period at ignition on.

Old 12-05-2013, 11:34 PM
  #17  
Rob Edwards
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
 
Rob Edwards's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 17,307
Received 2,549 Likes on 1,233 Posts
Default

And stays on, for some strange reason, if you keep a(n LED) bulb in it. Greg 'fixed' it in the process of idiotproofing all my work on Dan's beastie.


Old 12-06-2013, 12:06 AM
  #18  
Ed Scherer
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Ed Scherer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Shawnee, KS, USA
Posts: 7,330
Received 108 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

That's the "PARK BRAKE" LED that stays on, Rob.

(Mine does that, too. It's noted in the "Instrument Cluster Anomalies" sidebar in my Converting Porsche 928 Interior Lighting to LEDs.)

Sorry about the OT content, Bill.
Old 12-08-2013, 03:40 PM
  #19  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 46 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Little bit of a research update. I found the label shown below that was taped on my converter package. It shows a part number PO82608 instead of the part number BEN82608 as I ordered. This lead me to DEC (Diversified Environmental Catalysts) in Van Nuys, CA, a manufacturer of Direct Fit CARB-approved converters. Website: http://www.deccats.com/.

So, DEC manufactured this part for Benchmark, some kind of private label which to this point I cannot further identify, and I think DEC dropped shipped it directly to me. The product label has D-193-109 on it, which looks like the relevant CARB Executive Order, rather than D-193-86 noted in the selling vendor's online ad. The product does show in DEC's California catalog and other sites as applicable to 85-91 Porsche 928 (another document shows 85-95, look here: http://download.deccats.com/CA_Catalog/CA_Catalog.pdf). From pictures there, what I received LOOKS different in the converter area. I got a single Magnaflow 336008, while the catalog picture shows 2 separate cat units - note the bifurcating air tube. Hey, maybe the Mangaflow is acting like a quasi-X-pipe. I have the x-pipe drone in the mid-2K RPM range.

Anyway, Executive Order D-193-109 is for Magnaflow 336000 series 3-way cat, which is what I have (see snapshot zoomed of exhaust installed for correct EO number on the converter as California requires)! And DEC claims in a document below, they are covered by Magnaflow EOs. Even though Magaflow's database appears to be in error regarding its universal cats, I think this at least explains the certification for Benchmark's, er, make that DEC's PO82608. As soon as I nail this down to the point where I should be able to get the cat to pass visual as well as tailpipe testing, I'll correct the original post.

Note added: In a capture from their CARB catalog ( http://download.deccats.com/CA_Catalog/CA_Catalog.pdf ), they show PO82608 as fitting 85-95 928s, and they show direct fit cats for all 928s and other early water-cooled Porsches. See last picture.
Attached Images       
Old 12-08-2013, 04:17 PM
  #20  
90 S-4
Pro
 
90 S-4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: OC. Calif
Posts: 633
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Great info Bill, thanks for posting it ..
Old 12-08-2013, 07:43 PM
  #21  
jorj7
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
jorj7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,196
Received 53 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Yeah, but will it pass the sniffer test in two(four/six/...) years? That's what I'd worry about.
Seems like a good price, but if you have to replace it every couple of years, it can get more
expensive then a new stock one. I guess time will tell. I bought a couple of the Magnaflow
cats for my car. I was going to have a shop weld them into my stock setup. But then I don't
have the "89" MY problem.

George
90 S4 Grand Prix White (Murf #5)
94 GTS 5-Speed Midnight Blue
06 Cayenne S Havanna/Sand Beige (PASM)
http://928.jorj7.com
Old 12-08-2013, 09:51 PM
  #22  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 46 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

George: Reasonable concern. Hard to find any reports on these cats. Not been around long. The Random Technology "high flow" cats, never CARB approved, but installed often as a "performance" option, commonly fail within 2 years.
Old 12-09-2013, 07:59 PM
  #23  
Mongo
Official Bay Area Patriot
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
 
Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 31,653
Received 116 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

I'm on year 4 with mine, but we'll see what the sniffer says in March. If worse comes to worse, I may pick one of those up you had posted.
Old 12-10-2013, 09:01 AM
  #24  
danglerb
Nordschleife Master
 
danglerb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orange, Cal
Posts: 8,575
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Two points I would add;

Many don't put 50,000 miles in 5 years on their 928's.
Many who put on performance cats may have AFR too often out of normal ranges and fry cats or clog them.
Old 12-10-2013, 11:56 AM
  #25  
dprantl
Race Car
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by danglerb
Two points I would add;

Many don't put 50,000 miles in 5 years on their 928's.
Many who put on performance cats may have AFR too often out of normal ranges and fry cats or clog them.
^^ This. My high-flow cats that came with the X-Pipe have been good for 5 years/50k miles now. I have a wbO2 gauge in the car so know my AFR's are always good.

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
Old 03-26-2014, 02:36 PM
  #26  
x98boardwell
Three Wheelin'
 
x98boardwell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 1,399
Received 38 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Apparently, DEC (the company above) is not selling these anymore in CA since the executive order that came down from CARB stated their cans (along with many others that companies use) were not up to the required standard that they needed to be.

Also, I asked them what their rating or flow is... I have seen others selling cats which state 150 or 300 regarding either flow or what it captures but I am unaware of what those numbers mean. When I asked them what theirs were he said he didn't have that kind of data. Since I am unsure if it's relevant is anyone educated on whats acceptable numbers such as what separates good from bad cats?

Does anyone have any additional info on companies providing more info?

Thanks,
Bryan
Old 03-26-2014, 05:24 PM
  #27  
rnixon
Burning Brakes
 
rnixon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Los Altos, CA
Posts: 757
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by x98boardwell
I have seen others selling cats which state 150 or 300 regarding either flow or what it captures but I am unaware of what those numbers mean. When I asked them what theirs were he said he didn't have that kind of data. Since I am unsure if it's relevant is anyone educated on whats acceptable numbers such as what separates good from bad cats?
Cells per square inch. Race cats have lower values (100-200) and are less restrictive. I doubt that this number on its own is enough to judge a cat though.
Old 03-26-2014, 07:26 PM
  #28  
Mongo
Official Bay Area Patriot
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
 
Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 31,653
Received 116 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Magnaflow's 336008 will work for our car. It's CARB approved but with no air tube. If I fail next week, I'm picking up one. It's just a universal one, unlike the complete setup that Bill picked up, although this cat is the very same model used on his application.

Old 03-26-2014, 08:38 PM
  #29  
danglerb
Nordschleife Master
 
danglerb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orange, Cal
Posts: 8,575
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

If they look, best hope the numbers match what they have in the book. I bought a pair of the Magnaflow's out of the Calif only catalog listed for the 91+ 928.
Old 01-08-2015, 06:21 PM
  #30  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 46 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Follow-up on the aftermarket cat assembly I bought a couple of years ago... It failed after almost no time on the road. It worked to get my car to pass smog soon after I bought it. After a few months I removed it. It later was used to help George pass smog. Then it went into storage again. I pulled it out in October and installed it only to have the car fail NO emissions miserably (1200 PPM). HC and CO were quite low. This usually indicates a lean condition leading to high combustion chamber temps which produces NO. I swapped in a set of used Porsche cats donated to me and passed smog with reasonable numbers. So, the NO section of the aftermarket converter failed.


Quick Reply: CARB Approved Catalytic Converter Solutions



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:00 PM.