Murf 928 vs. Twin Screw
10-20-2005, 11:51 PM
#61
Porsche is a turbo company.
They always have been. And when there is room and a properly built engine for the turbo, and the turbo is sized correctly, its a great combination.
They always have been. And when there is room and a properly built engine for the turbo, and the turbo is sized correctly, its a great combination.
10-21-2005, 04:38 AM
#65
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by OrionKhan
Two pages of posts and noboday actually discussed which is better Murf 928 or Twin Screw...classic... 
10-21-2005, 05:05 AM
#66
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
European 42# injector SharkTuner test car (with Delta P intercooler SC kit) John mentions is heading to dyno as I type this. 
Results might not be as impressive as some charts we have seen here simply because level of boost is lowish.
Results might not be as impressive as some charts we have seen here simply because level of boost is lowish.
10-21-2005, 05:44 AM
#67
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles/Honolulu
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've seen exactly one supercharged 996. Merdian in So Cal had the car and it was a pain in the ***, sounded cool and wasn't terribly fast. Meridian didn't do the install, they were hired to try and fix it. In the end they got it done but wished the owner had opted for turbos instead.
10-21-2005, 05:54 AM
#68
Rennlist Member
Hi Brendan
The tip in problem with the twin screw CAN be fixed using a standard LH
Hi Bill,
You should hear something more of the system very soon.....
The tip in problem with the twin screw CAN be fixed using a standard LH
Hi Bill,
You should hear something more of the system very soon.....
10-21-2005, 08:14 AM
#69
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: The Great Northwest
Posts: 12,264
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Good cause that wasn't what he was looking for. There was a very brief chat bout whether the TS could provide 500+ RWHP...
He was also looking for info concerning fueling and ems.
The thread 'evolved' however.
He was also looking for info concerning fueling and ems.
The thread 'evolved' however.
Originally Posted by OrionKhan
Two pages of posts and noboday actually discussed which is better Murf 928 or Twin Screw...classic...
10-21-2005, 08:20 AM
#70
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: The Great Northwest
Posts: 12,264
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
John,
Regarding tip in we were going to retard timimg a bit below 3500 using a SMT. What say you?
Very curious to hear what you have in store with your custom LH.
Regarding tip in we were going to retard timimg a bit below 3500 using a SMT. What say you?
Very curious to hear what you have in store with your custom LH.
Originally Posted by John Speake
Hi Brendan
The tip in problem with the twin screw CAN be fixed using a standard LH
Hi Bill,
You should hear something more of the system very soon.....
The tip in problem with the twin screw CAN be fixed using a standard LH
Hi Bill,
You should hear something more of the system very soon.....
10-21-2005, 08:26 AM
#71
Drifting
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: an unnatural suburban habitat
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jim- my street bike has laptop interface for fuel mapping and timing, so with an exhaust and other mods it gets precise fueling at all times. If that same capability becomes available for our antique 928 brains, that sounds really good.
10-21-2005, 10:42 AM
#73
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
To think a turbo 928 couldn't break 400rwhp (at all) when it's already making 365rwhp@4.5psi is kinda silly. I'm glad everyone is carefully tuning in lieu of just throwing fuel & boost at the poor 20-year old engine! Now that my throttle-housing leak is fixed (took a LOT of steel), I'll 1/4 tonight & redyno next weekend...(Dynoing a 928TS is fun, M'Kay?)
I'm glad everyone is carefully tuning in lieu of just throwing fuel & boost at the poor 20-year old engine! Now that my throttle-housing leak is fixed (took a LOT of steel), I'll 1/4 tonight & redyno next weekend...(Dynoing a 928TS is fun, M'Kay?)
10-21-2005, 10:48 AM
#74
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: The Great Northwest
Posts: 12,264
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Did someone say that?
Originally Posted by MarkRobinson
To think a turbo 928 couldn't break 400rwhp (at all) when it's already making 365rwhp@4.5psi is kinda silly. I'm glad everyone is carefully tuning in lieu of just throwing fuel & boost at the poor 20-year old engine! Now that my throttle-housing leak is fixed (took a LOT of steel), I'll 1/4 tonight & redyno next weekend...(Dynoing a 928TS is fun, M'Kay?)
I'm glad everyone is carefully tuning in lieu of just throwing fuel & boost at the poor 20-year old engine! Now that my throttle-housing leak is fixed (took a LOT of steel), I'll 1/4 tonight & redyno next weekend...(Dynoing a 928TS is fun, M'Kay?)
10-21-2005, 12:28 PM
#75
Rennlist Member
European 42# injector SharkTuner test car (with Delta P intercooler SC kit) John mentions is heading to dyno as I type this. Results might not be as impressive as some charts we have seen here simply because level of boost is lowish.
__________________
Erkka
>>>>>>>>>>>>
Well, it came out at:
Rear wheels:
322 kW = 438 hp @ 5700 rpm
Engine:
365 kW = 496 hp @ 5700 rpm
633 Nm @ 5200 rpm
Boost (c/f) is about 6psi.
__________________
Erkka
>>>>>>>>>>>>
Well, it came out at:
Rear wheels:
322 kW = 438 hp @ 5700 rpm
Engine:
365 kW = 496 hp @ 5700 rpm
633 Nm @ 5200 rpm
Boost (c/f) is about 6psi.