Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Lowering Suspension Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-09-2017, 11:38 PM
  #61  
Noahs944
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Noahs944's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 4,015
Received 229 Likes on 168 Posts
Default

Whoops! Sorry.

-------

Justin, thanks for getting those 250 lb/springs for me.

------

Question about DELRIN.
Since I'm seriously considering delrin sway bar and front & rear control arm bushings... for the street mostly with some track use. Is delrin to noisey/squeaky? or should I go rubber?
Old 01-10-2017, 10:03 AM
  #62  
morghen
Three Wheelin'
 
morghen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Europe > Romania
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Never tried them, a friend did..they made noises and wore out.
Years ago I measured and made a drawing for a delrin shifter bushing..the one next to the gearbox.
Its worn faster than the 30+ years old part even though I designed minimal play between the metal and the bushing.

If you want stiffness go for polyurethane.
You can buy the powerflex bushings from ideola's garage or there are other options.
Old 01-11-2017, 09:15 AM
  #63  
mel_t_vin
Rennlist Member
 
mel_t_vin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, San Francisco, Tampa
Posts: 2,103
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 924srr27l
I think or thought the Motion ratio's differ for the 924 and later 944 because the wishbones were longer and also because of the strut angle and wishbone length the actual Wheel ratio is like .8 and .6 on rear T bars of the actual spring rate?
Not completely correct.

Motion ratio on front springs...M(f) = ~0.9
Motion ratio on rear springs...M(r) = ~0.65^2 [~0.42]
M(r) does not apply to torsion bars.

Ergo...Morghen's 924 GTS is running equivalent spring rates of ~252 lb/in [280 * 0.9] up front and ~211 lb/in [~137 + (200 * 0.42)] out back. This is in line with the real world result he reports...relatively neutral handling, with probably a slight tendency to understeer when pushed.
Old 01-11-2017, 10:11 AM
  #64  
924srr27l
Burning Brakes
 
924srr27l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mel_t_vin
Not completely correct.

Motion ratio on front springs...M(f) = ~0.9
Motion ratio on rear springs...M(r) = ~0.65^2 [~0.42]
M(r) does not apply to torsion bars.

Ergo...Morghen's 924 GTS is running equivalent spring rates of ~252 lb/in [280 * 0.9] up front and ~211 lb/in [~137 + (200 * 0.42)] out back. This is in line with the real world result he reports...relatively neutral handling, with probably a slight tendency to understeer when pushed.
Excellent,

What 's the Wheel rate ? is this different or the same thing
If the front (.9 rate) is on the shorter 924 wishbone, what's the longer later 944 / 968 type?

Does an incorrect wishbone angle from excessive lowering change the motion ratio or not? and this only affects the camber change?

The rear Hollow 27mm T bars I have currently fitted Elephant Racing rate at 220Lbs, so this computes to 132 Lbs actual ? and my 190Lbs fronts 171Lbs
which would also explain why have a hit if understeer also if the rear is 30% softer Correct?


R
Old 01-12-2017, 07:58 AM
  #65  
mel_t_vin
Rennlist Member
 
mel_t_vin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, San Francisco, Tampa
Posts: 2,103
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 924srr27l
What 's the Wheel rate?
My mistake.

Where I said motion ratio, I should have said wheel rate. Have always seen rear wheel rate from a coilover spring calculated as: W(r) = M(r)^2 * spring rate, where M(r) = ~0.65

And have always seen front wheel rate calculated as: W(f) = M(f) * spring rate, where M(f) = ~0.9

But, as previously mentioned, motion ratio does not apply to torsion bars. Your 220 lb/in-rated 27 mm bars convey to the torsion/coilover summation equation directly [220 lb/in], as they are axially coincident with the spring plate pivot point.

Re: early offset/late offset control arms...good question. Have not seen anyone reference different numbers for front motion ratio to compensate for the ~25mm difference.

Re: your slight understeer...suspect that can be attributed more to your oversized 26.8 mm sway [with respect to your lightweight chassis] than to the difference in front-to-rear spring rate. Suggest you either step down the front bar or step up the rear bar.
Old 01-12-2017, 10:04 AM
  #66  
924srr27l
Burning Brakes
 
924srr27l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mel_t_vin
My mistake.

Where I said motion ratio, I should have said wheel rate. Have always seen rear wheel rate from a coilover spring calculated as: W(r) = M(r)^2 * spring rate, where M(r) = ~0.65

And have always seen front wheel rate calculated as: W(f) = M(f) * spring rate, where M(f) = ~0.9

But, as previously mentioned, motion ratio does not apply to torsion bars. Your 220 lb/in-rated 27 mm bars convey to the torsion/coilover summation equation directly [220 lb/in], as they are axially coincident with the spring plate pivot point.

Re: early offset/late offset control arms...good question. Have not seen anyone reference different numbers for front motion ratio to compensate for the ~25mm difference.

Re: your slight understeer...suspect that can be attributed more to your oversized 26.8 mm sway [with respect to your lightweight chassis] than to the difference in front-to-rear spring rate. Suggest you either step down the front bar or step up the rear bar.
Ok so this means my front 190 Lb's Springs give a wheels rate of 171Lbs, but the rear 220 lbs is the actual , which is almost a 30% Stiffer rear springs but I have some very (slight) understeer which was worst on the 8x16 ;s rims compared to 7x16 's . Sure the front bar may be a tad stiff , I could come down to 25mm or go up from 18mm to 20mm rear.

For Sprints & a Production competition I was thinking of sorting the Non parrallel Wishbones, and tie rods then Increasing the front springs to 250Lbs and fitting coil over Springs as well as the T bars, so looking a the above calulations the rear springs would need to be about 150Lbs? if the 220lb T bars simply add the coil spring rate on top (total 370Lbs) but the .65 rear coil wheel rate is 97.5 (Wheel rate Total 317.50Lbs)

R
Old 01-12-2017, 11:53 AM
  #67  
Noahs944
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Noahs944's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 4,015
Received 229 Likes on 168 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by morghen
Never tried them, a friend did..they made noises and wore out.
Years ago I measured and made a drawing for a delrin shifter bushing..the one next to the gearbox.
Its worn faster than the 30+ years old part even though I designed minimal play between the metal and the bushing.

If you want stiffness go for polyurethane.
You can buy the powerflex bushings from ideola's garage or there are other options.
Just read up on Delrin. I think I'll skip since my car isn't a competition car. Rubber is the plan but I'd like to see if powerflex is a good choice for long term daily use.
Old 01-13-2017, 07:20 AM
  #68  
morghen
Three Wheelin'
 
morghen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Europe > Romania
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Take care with poly as well..
As far as I understand the material, Delrin is not high resilience and will take a set...make noises and affect alignment.


Last edited by morghen; 01-13-2017 at 07:55 AM.
Old 01-18-2017, 09:17 AM
  #69  
mel_t_vin
Rennlist Member
 
mel_t_vin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, San Francisco, Tampa
Posts: 2,103
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 924srr27l
Ok so this means my front 190 Lb's Springs give a wheels rate of 171Lbs, but the rear 220 lbs is the actual.
Front W(r) = ~171 lb/in...correct [190 * 0.9]
Rear W(r) = ~220 lb/in...correct [for 27 mm torsions]

Originally Posted by 924srr27l
so looking a the above calulations the rear springs would need to be about 150Lbs? if the 220lb T bars simply add the coil spring rate on top (total 370Lbs) but the .65 rear coil wheel rate is 97.5 (Wheel rate Total 317.50Lbs)
Not quite.

Rear W(r) = M(r)^2 * spring rate
Rear W(r) = 0.65^2 * 150 = ~63.4 lb/in

Total rear W(r) = springs + torsions = ~63.4 + ~220 = ~283.4 lb/in
Old 01-18-2017, 09:59 AM
  #70  
924srr27l
Burning Brakes
 
924srr27l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mel_t_vin
Front W(r) = ~171 lb/in...correct [190 * 0.9]
Rear W(r) = ~220 lb/in...correct [for 27 mm torsions]



Not quite.

Rear W(r) = M(r)^2 * spring rate
Rear W(r) = 0.65^2 * 150 = ~63.4 lb/in

Total rear W(r) = springs + torsions = ~63.4 + ~220 = ~283.4 lb/in
Ok, how does a .65 ratio work out to be 63.4Lbs from a 150 Lb spring?

.65 of 150 is 97.5 ?


R
Old 01-18-2017, 10:07 AM
  #71  
porscheaddicted
Intermediate
 
porscheaddicted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would go with a Bilstein P8 suspension kit IIWY
Old 01-18-2017, 10:33 AM
  #72  
924srr27l
Burning Brakes
 
924srr27l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by porscheaddicted
I would go with a Bilstein P8 suspension kit IIWY

Not heard of that one, is it New?

R
Old 01-20-2017, 04:11 AM
  #73  
J1NX3D
Three Wheelin'
 
J1NX3D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,913
Received 115 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

He probably means B8's. not a kit, just another bilstein shock.
Old 01-20-2017, 09:27 AM
  #74  
924srr27l
Burning Brakes
 
924srr27l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

BUMP.....

Originally Posted by 924srr27l
Ok, how does a .65 ratio work out to be 63.4Lbs from a 150 Lb spring?

.65 of 150 is 97.5 ?

R
Old 01-20-2017, 10:11 PM
  #75  
mikey_audiogeek
Three Wheelin'
 
mikey_audiogeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,547
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 924srr27l
BUMP.....
0.65 squared (that's what ^2 means) is 0.4225. Multiply that by the spring rate gives you the answer as given.

Cheers,
Mike


Quick Reply: Lowering Suspension Questions



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:30 PM.