Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

What's the better track car: 924, 924S, or 944?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-16-2016, 02:47 PM
  #1  
Shawn Stanford
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Shawn Stanford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Poconos
Posts: 5,207
Received 793 Likes on 445 Posts
Default What's the better track car: 924, 924S, or 944?

I'm considering setting up a 'track' car. It will be dual purpose, but weighted toward track use. On CL I have my choice of several cars, including early 944s for around $1k, and a couple of complete 924s - including a running 'S' - that I think I could take away for $500.

So, what are the thoughts of those who track, drive, maintain, and upgrade these cars?

I'm not interested in winning Le Mans, I just want a car that will be fun and reasonably cheap to put a couple thousand miles on every year, between weekend drives and the track.

I'm looking for input and pros/cons on:
  • Performance.
  • Parts availability.
  • Ease of maintenance.
  • Durability.
  • Upgradability.

Thanks for any advice.
Old 10-16-2016, 03:06 PM
  #2  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,498
Received 633 Likes on 490 Posts
Default

924S.
Light body with the power of a 944 engine.

A standard 924 is very light but down 40+hp from a 944.
A 944 is heavier, a lot depending on the year.
Old 10-16-2016, 05:23 PM
  #3  
FrenchToast
Three Wheelin'
 
FrenchToast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,969
Likes: 0
Received 74 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Being as how most track days now are dominated by insanely fast cars, a normal, stock 924 could be slow depending on the event you're attending. A slow car by itself is fine. I saw an MGB GT at an event once that was dominated by new M3s, Z06s, and Nissan GTRs. At that point you're less driving on the track and more just getting out of people's way.

Lightened and with some mild engine work a 924 is probably fine though, and close in performance to a 924.

Early 924's do have mild rust issues - more so than later cars - which is something to consider. Early 924s also have rear drum brakes.

If you get a 924, 924S or an early 944 you should really consider changing both front spindles with later units. The early ones have a hollow left spindle that can break under track conditions. You lose the stock speedometer however.

Also you should try sitting in the early cars. If you are tall their slightly lower steering column could be annoying.

And if you are really tall a car with a sunroof could be problematic. Non-sunroof cars are hard to come by though.
Old 10-16-2016, 05:35 PM
  #4  
goatfarmerdave
Pro
 
goatfarmerdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Just north of Toronto
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

944 way more common therefore easier to get parts. A set of koni yellows and some track tires and you will have a blast. I had an 84 and loved it. simple and fun.
Old 10-16-2016, 08:23 PM
  #5  
Shawn Stanford
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Shawn Stanford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Poconos
Posts: 5,207
Received 793 Likes on 445 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by goatfarmerdave
944 way more common therefore easier to get parts. A set of koni yellows and some track tires and you will have a blast. I had an 84 and loved it. simple and fun.
Aren't a lot of the parts interchangeable? Especially with the 'S'?
Old 10-16-2016, 08:37 PM
  #6  
kevin12973
Racer
 
kevin12973's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Greenville New York
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A car for the track needs to be in very good mechanical condition. I would suggest staying away from a cheap 944 unless you will be going through it thoroughly. Brakes, suspension, engine, electrical, interior upgrades and so on will run up $5,000 minimum. You could do yourself a huge favor and find a track duty 944 of any model year and save time and money. Just make sure its not worn out.
Old 10-16-2016, 10:12 PM
  #7  
Van
Rennlist Member
 
Van's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hyde Park, NY
Posts: 12,007
Received 88 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

I see the big advantage of the 944 is the fender flares. That lets you run a wider tire than a 924S - plus you'll have a larger selection of used rims to pick up a few sets.

I wouldn't consider a 924 - too slow. (Unless it's a 924 Carrera GTS... But that's probably out of your price range.)
Old 10-16-2016, 10:46 PM
  #8  
grenadiers
Advanced
 
grenadiers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

[QUOTE=Van;13679744]I see the big advantage of the 944 is the fender flares. That lets you run a wider tire than a 924S - plus you'll have a larger selection of used rims to pick up a few sets.

I have both an early 944 and an '88 924S track car. Same car, same performance. I run 225s on all four corners on both cars. What larger size tire is necessary than that? These cars have fairly anemic engines, corner well, and look pretty good in my opinion. However, when a VW Passat four door can whip you on the straights, well, tire size isn't going to matter. I've also have had 924's and several 924 turbos. I've left that building.
Old 10-16-2016, 11:27 PM
  #9  
Van
Rennlist Member
 
Van's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hyde Park, NY
Posts: 12,007
Received 88 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by grenadiers
What larger size tire is necessary than that?
On my (track) car, I run 225 on 8" rims in the front and 245 on 9" rims in the rear. But that's not a necessity... I'm just saying the flares will give you a little more room for more choices. I've had friends at the track with 924Ss that have corded tires, or want to try a different tire, and early 944 offset rims don't fit - so I can't loan them my extras.
Old 10-16-2016, 11:54 PM
  #10  
Shawn Stanford
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Shawn Stanford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Poconos
Posts: 5,207
Received 793 Likes on 445 Posts
Default

Like I said: I'm not interested in winning Le Mans. I'm never - never - going to have the fastest car; I'm simply not interested in spending that kind of money. I just want something I can tinker with and bash around in without feeling like I'm damaging an heirloom, which is how I feel about tracking my 951.

Thanks for the input. There's an $800 924S near me with an overheating problem. What I'm reading says that could be a straightforward fix. I'm going to give it a couple weeks and take a look and, if it's solid, offer him $500.
Old 10-17-2016, 08:43 AM
  #11  
Porvair
Instructor
 
Porvair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 196
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

If all else fails - Miata.
Old 10-17-2016, 08:53 AM
  #12  
morghen
Three Wheelin'
 
morghen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Europe > Romania
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

•Performance. (924S as its a taco ligther than the 944)
•Parts availability. (924S/944 loads of them waiting to be parted)
•Ease of maintenance. (924 simplest of them all and probably cheapest , but slowest)
•Durability. (depends on your setup and how well you control your project..could be any of them)
•Upgradability. (deff 944)

So the 924 has 2 points, the 924S has 3 points and the 944 has 3 points as well. 924S or 944 is the same deal, unless you have to run really wide tires and you cant fit them without a wider body.

You could buy that 78 924 off Noah(he's just started parting it) and build on that...looks like good base. If you want you can keep the 2L, import some high compression pistons from europe, get a reworked head from europe, add a better cam and you're in the same range of the 944 power with less weight.
Old 10-17-2016, 01:25 PM
  #13  
curtisr
Rennlist Member
 
curtisr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario
Posts: 1,708
Received 71 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Generally cheaper to buy outright, the 924s http://www.porschepassion.com/924.htm was three mph faster thanks to its lighter weight and narrower stance.

People (already) think this car is a Mazda.

To my mind if you prefer the look of the wheel-well arches that's the choice to make. I find these remind me too much of the shoulder-pad craze we suffered through in the '80s.
Old 10-17-2016, 03:22 PM
  #14  
konakat
Burning Brakes
 
konakat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Columbia, MD
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

An '88 924S would be the best bet. 160HP higher compression engine instead of the 143hp you get from an early 944, plus it is slightly lighter. You are more limited in tire width, but unless you plan to add a lot of power that's not a big deal. You also have late offset on the 924S which opens up a lot more wheel options, though you do miss out on light and cheap cookie cutters.
Old 10-17-2016, 03:31 PM
  #15  
Van
Rennlist Member
 
Van's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hyde Park, NY
Posts: 12,007
Received 88 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Shawn Stanford
I just want something I can tinker with and bash around in without feeling like I'm damaging an heirloom, which is how I feel about tracking my 951.
Well, since you already have a 951, I'd stick to late 944s. This way you can interchange parts - like wheels, struts, control arms, tie rods, sway bars, axles, etc. if you find yourself either needing something last minute to go to the track and/or something gets hand-me-downed to the 944.

Some of those parts will fit on a 924S or early 944 - but not all. And most of them will not fit on a 924.


Quick Reply: What's the better track car: 924, 924S, or 944?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:27 AM.