Help me design my head
#1
Race Car
Thread Starter
Help me design my head
Dropped off my original 1988 n/a 8 valve head to an engine rebuilder facility, so he can assess & quote.
I told him:
"I'm considering 2 paths.
1) fit & machine 47mm intake valves & open up the exhaust ports. Plus the basic rebuild guides/seals/valve lap
2) shave .030" off the bottom to increase the CR. Stick with the factory valves. Open the exhaust ports, perform the basic rebuild.
In either scenario Turbo valve springs will be installed."
I'm leaning towards option 2 because the larger valves might require fly cutting the piston which might be opening a can of worms I might regret, plus that adds quite a bit of parts expense.
(And the little voice in my head is telling me I can get around the same performance gain by shaving the head).
So, if I were to do option 2, should I go further? Is there a lot more I could do? Or all things considered (budget is a concern), is option 2 the way to go?
Am planning on keeping the factory hyd lifters, factory 1.1mm head gasket, and am considering going back to the camshaft I had before with .474 lift. Or if the valves don't hit the pistons, maybe stick with the .502 lift cam I have been running.
Thinking the .030" shave would still allow for pump gas to be used. The exhaust port REALLY has a lot of metal preventing the flow as one can see clearly when a gasket is mounted.
Thoughts or suggestions? Thanks.
I told him:
"I'm considering 2 paths.
1) fit & machine 47mm intake valves & open up the exhaust ports. Plus the basic rebuild guides/seals/valve lap
2) shave .030" off the bottom to increase the CR. Stick with the factory valves. Open the exhaust ports, perform the basic rebuild.
In either scenario Turbo valve springs will be installed."
I'm leaning towards option 2 because the larger valves might require fly cutting the piston which might be opening a can of worms I might regret, plus that adds quite a bit of parts expense.
(And the little voice in my head is telling me I can get around the same performance gain by shaving the head).
So, if I were to do option 2, should I go further? Is there a lot more I could do? Or all things considered (budget is a concern), is option 2 the way to go?
Am planning on keeping the factory hyd lifters, factory 1.1mm head gasket, and am considering going back to the camshaft I had before with .474 lift. Or if the valves don't hit the pistons, maybe stick with the .502 lift cam I have been running.
Thinking the .030" shave would still allow for pump gas to be used. The exhaust port REALLY has a lot of metal preventing the flow as one can see clearly when a gasket is mounted.
Thoughts or suggestions? Thanks.
#2
Team Owner
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: one thousand, five hundred miles north of Ft. Lauderdale for the summer.
Posts: 28,704
Received 212 Likes
on
153 Posts
all this for 9~13 hp?
get an Evo. this kind of stuff just isn't necessary for an 8v '80s classic.
I know I sound like the biggest ***
sorry. but I think people sometimes go a little haywire without seeing the big picture....
enjoy your nice resto for what it is - and not get all hurt with occult ****.
get an Evo. this kind of stuff just isn't necessary for an 8v '80s classic.
I know I sound like the biggest ***
sorry. but I think people sometimes go a little haywire without seeing the big picture....
enjoy your nice resto for what it is - and not get all hurt with occult ****.
#3
Rainman
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Dropped off my original 1988 n/a 8 valve head to an engine rebuilder facility, so he can assess & quote.
I told him:
"I'm considering 2 paths.
1) fit & machine 47mm intake valves & open up the exhaust ports. Plus the basic rebuild guides/seals/valve lap
2) shave .030" off the bottom to increase the CR. Stick with the factory valves. Open the exhaust ports, perform the basic rebuild.
In either scenario Turbo valve springs will be installed."
I'm leaning towards option 2 because the larger valves might require fly cutting the piston which might be opening a can of worms I might regret, plus that adds quite a bit of parts expense.
(And the little voice in my head is telling me I can get around the same performance gain by shaving the head).
So, if I were to do option 2, should I go further? Is there a lot more I could do? Or all things considered (budget is a concern), is option 2 the way to go?
Am planning on keeping the factory hyd lifters, factory 1.1mm head gasket, and am considering going back to the camshaft I had before with .474 lift. Or if the valves don't hit the pistons, maybe stick with the .502 lift cam I have been running.
Thinking the .030" shave would still allow for pump gas to be used. The exhaust port REALLY has a lot of metal preventing the flow as one can see clearly when a gasket is mounted.
Thoughts or suggestions? Thanks.
I told him:
"I'm considering 2 paths.
1) fit & machine 47mm intake valves & open up the exhaust ports. Plus the basic rebuild guides/seals/valve lap
2) shave .030" off the bottom to increase the CR. Stick with the factory valves. Open the exhaust ports, perform the basic rebuild.
In either scenario Turbo valve springs will be installed."
I'm leaning towards option 2 because the larger valves might require fly cutting the piston which might be opening a can of worms I might regret, plus that adds quite a bit of parts expense.
(And the little voice in my head is telling me I can get around the same performance gain by shaving the head).
So, if I were to do option 2, should I go further? Is there a lot more I could do? Or all things considered (budget is a concern), is option 2 the way to go?
Am planning on keeping the factory hyd lifters, factory 1.1mm head gasket, and am considering going back to the camshaft I had before with .474 lift. Or if the valves don't hit the pistons, maybe stick with the .502 lift cam I have been running.
Thinking the .030" shave would still allow for pump gas to be used. The exhaust port REALLY has a lot of metal preventing the flow as one can see clearly when a gasket is mounted.
Thoughts or suggestions? Thanks.
your 1988 engine is already the highest-CR 2.5 engine offered in north america, upping CR the amount you'd gain with that kind of shave wouldn't really net you much power.
the 1987 944 had 9.5:1 CR and the 1988 had 10,2. going up 0.7 CR (all in the piston) got 5 HP but required higher-octane gas to get there.
you might get 1-2 more by shaving the head more than is necessary for a clean-up. the head as standard will support you just fine, a hot cam is what you should try.
#5
Drifting
the early 70's 2.4 mfi motors came in three flavors; T, E and S. The intake runners and throttle butterflies (28-30-32) where sized to match the different cams with a huge disparity in HP numbers and drivability.
I would port match and shoot for 10:1 with your 'big stick'))
it is a dark science....100hp/liter is magical but it comes at an expense. ask any S2000 owner.
I would port match and shoot for 10:1 with your 'big stick'))
it is a dark science....100hp/liter is magical but it comes at an expense. ask any S2000 owner.
#6
Rennlist Member
Help me design my head
What about porting and polishing the head? I bet you could DIY and save a lot of money. V2 is right about the CR being less relevant.
Trending Topics
#8
Rennlist Member
Do your research... while a DIY port/polish job will save you money, it won't really give you much power gain (if any). There is a real science to that... and experience pays off.
#9
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
bigger valves, ported head. get bigger exhaust valves also since there's no ceramic like the turbo heads.
4-1 tuned headers, probably a short runner intake.
47mm intake
42mm exhaust
Then you should see some results.
4-1 tuned headers, probably a short runner intake.
47mm intake
42mm exhaust
Then you should see some results.
#10
Drifting
That is a lot of cam ... you definitely would need larger intake valves and some professional porting if you want it done right !
I would question the experts like Michael Mount or Jon Milledge regarding all the work you plan on doing as you might just be throwing your money away if not done properly.
Obviously you would need to tune everything on a proper dyno with an adjustable fuel pressure regulator and AFR gauge ...
Just sayin ...
Cheers
Phil
I would question the experts like Michael Mount or Jon Milledge regarding all the work you plan on doing as you might just be throwing your money away if not done properly.
Obviously you would need to tune everything on a proper dyno with an adjustable fuel pressure regulator and AFR gauge ...
Just sayin ...
Cheers
Phil
#11
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
That is a lot of cam ... you definitely would need larger intake valves and some professional porting if you want it done right !
I would question the experts like Michael Mount or Jon Milledge regarding all the work you plan on doing as you might just be throwing your money away if not done properly.
Obviously you would need to tune everything on a proper dyno with an adjustable fuel pressure regulator and AFR gauge ...
Just sayin ...
Cheers
Phil
I would question the experts like Michael Mount or Jon Milledge regarding all the work you plan on doing as you might just be throwing your money away if not done properly.
Obviously you would need to tune everything on a proper dyno with an adjustable fuel pressure regulator and AFR gauge ...
Just sayin ...
Cheers
Phil
#12
Rennlist Member
#13
Rennlist Member
not much, specially if thats the only mod. and depending on what your looking for 4-1 "tuned" headers may hurt you. At least by the looks of the OP
#14
Race Car
Thread Starter
I've posted this information before. The cam I have been running lately: Milledge 8sr-14: http://jonmilledgeengineering.com/product/8sr-14/
Big THANKS to everyone for the insights & ideas.
#15
Rainman
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
save your money on valve work/porting. even with that cam you just aren't moving enough air to overwhelm the stock head. while the shape could be improved the ports are pretty darn big already and flow very well as standard.
unless money is no object for this car, then go nuts.
unless money is no object for this car, then go nuts.