Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Help me design my head

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-26-2015, 01:34 AM
  #1  
Noahs944
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Noahs944's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 4,015
Received 229 Likes on 168 Posts
Default Help me design my head

Dropped off my original 1988 n/a 8 valve head to an engine rebuilder facility, so he can assess & quote.

I told him:

"I'm considering 2 paths.

1) fit & machine 47mm intake valves & open up the exhaust ports. Plus the basic rebuild guides/seals/valve lap

2) shave .030" off the bottom to increase the CR. Stick with the factory valves. Open the exhaust ports, perform the basic rebuild.

In either scenario Turbo valve springs will be installed."

I'm leaning towards option 2 because the larger valves might require fly cutting the piston which might be opening a can of worms I might regret, plus that adds quite a bit of parts expense.

(And the little voice in my head is telling me I can get around the same performance gain by shaving the head).

So, if I were to do option 2, should I go further? Is there a lot more I could do? Or all things considered (budget is a concern), is option 2 the way to go?

Am planning on keeping the factory hyd lifters, factory 1.1mm head gasket, and am considering going back to the camshaft I had before with .474 lift. Or if the valves don't hit the pistons, maybe stick with the .502 lift cam I have been running.

Thinking the .030" shave would still allow for pump gas to be used. The exhaust port REALLY has a lot of metal preventing the flow as one can see clearly when a gasket is mounted.

Thoughts or suggestions? Thanks.
Old 05-26-2015, 02:33 AM
  #2  
odurandina
Team Owner
 
odurandina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: one thousand, five hundred miles north of Ft. Lauderdale for the summer.
Posts: 28,704
Received 212 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

all this for 9~13 hp?

get an Evo. this kind of stuff just isn't necessary for an 8v '80s classic.

I know I sound like the biggest ***

sorry. but I think people sometimes go a little haywire without seeing the big picture....

enjoy your nice resto for what it is - and not get all hurt with occult ****.
Old 05-26-2015, 12:57 PM
  #3  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,497
Received 632 Likes on 490 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Noahs944
Dropped off my original 1988 n/a 8 valve head to an engine rebuilder facility, so he can assess & quote.

I told him:

"I'm considering 2 paths.

1) fit & machine 47mm intake valves & open up the exhaust ports. Plus the basic rebuild guides/seals/valve lap

2) shave .030" off the bottom to increase the CR. Stick with the factory valves. Open the exhaust ports, perform the basic rebuild.

In either scenario Turbo valve springs will be installed."

I'm leaning towards option 2 because the larger valves might require fly cutting the piston which might be opening a can of worms I might regret, plus that adds quite a bit of parts expense.

(And the little voice in my head is telling me I can get around the same performance gain by shaving the head).

So, if I were to do option 2, should I go further? Is there a lot more I could do? Or all things considered (budget is a concern), is option 2 the way to go?

Am planning on keeping the factory hyd lifters, factory 1.1mm head gasket, and am considering going back to the camshaft I had before with .474 lift. Or if the valves don't hit the pistons, maybe stick with the .502 lift cam I have been running.

Thinking the .030" shave would still allow for pump gas to be used. The exhaust port REALLY has a lot of metal preventing the flow as one can see clearly when a gasket is mounted.

Thoughts or suggestions? Thanks.
unless you are running high RPM, bigger displacement or a bigger cam you will be OK with just a standard head rebuild and standard valves.
your 1988 engine is already the highest-CR 2.5 engine offered in north america, upping CR the amount you'd gain with that kind of shave wouldn't really net you much power.

the 1987 944 had 9.5:1 CR and the 1988 had 10,2. going up 0.7 CR (all in the piston) got 5 HP but required higher-octane gas to get there.

you might get 1-2 more by shaving the head more than is necessary for a clean-up. the head as standard will support you just fine, a hot cam is what you should try.
Old 05-26-2015, 01:09 PM
  #4  
Noahs944
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Noahs944's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 4,015
Received 229 Likes on 168 Posts
Default

I already run one of the hottest cams bro.
Old 05-26-2015, 01:27 PM
  #5  
thomasmryan
Drifting
 
thomasmryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: smoky mountains
Posts: 2,585
Received 120 Likes on 88 Posts
Default

the early 70's 2.4 mfi motors came in three flavors; T, E and S. The intake runners and throttle butterflies (28-30-32) where sized to match the different cams with a huge disparity in HP numbers and drivability.

I would port match and shoot for 10:1 with your 'big stick'))

it is a dark science....100hp/liter is magical but it comes at an expense. ask any S2000 owner.
Old 05-26-2015, 02:11 PM
  #6  
odonnell
Rennlist Member
 
odonnell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 4,762
Likes: 0
Received 63 Likes on 45 Posts
Default Help me design my head

What about porting and polishing the head? I bet you could DIY and save a lot of money. V2 is right about the CR being less relevant.
Old 05-26-2015, 02:54 PM
  #7  
Arominus
Race Car
 
Arominus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,103
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

don't shave the head, 10.2 is enough with the head design for pump gas. I like the port/polish/port match ideas here. I'd go there.
Old 05-26-2015, 05:14 PM
  #8  
Van
Rennlist Member
 
Van's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hyde Park, NY
Posts: 12,007
Received 88 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sausagehacker
What about porting and polishing the head? I bet you could DIY and save a lot of money.
Do your research... while a DIY port/polish job will save you money, it won't really give you much power gain (if any). There is a real science to that... and experience pays off.
Old 05-26-2015, 11:14 PM
  #9  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

bigger valves, ported head. get bigger exhaust valves also since there's no ceramic like the turbo heads.
4-1 tuned headers, probably a short runner intake.
47mm intake
42mm exhaust

Then you should see some results.
Old 05-27-2015, 12:24 AM
  #10  
wildcat077
Drifting
 
wildcat077's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Montreal,Canada
Posts: 3,395
Received 186 Likes on 160 Posts
Default

That is a lot of cam ... you definitely would need larger intake valves and some professional porting if you want it done right !
I would question the experts like Michael Mount or Jon Milledge regarding all the work you plan on doing as you might just be throwing your money away if not done properly.
Obviously you would need to tune everything on a proper dyno with an adjustable fuel pressure regulator and AFR gauge ...

Just sayin ...

Cheers
Phil
Old 05-27-2015, 07:25 AM
  #11  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wildcat077
That is a lot of cam ... you definitely would need larger intake valves and some professional porting if you want it done right !
I would question the experts like Michael Mount or Jon Milledge regarding all the work you plan on doing as you might just be throwing your money away if not done properly.
Obviously you would need to tune everything on a proper dyno with an adjustable fuel pressure regulator and AFR gauge ...

Just sayin ...

Cheers
Phil
You can have a lot of lift, but if you have low duration, wont do to much more.
Old 05-28-2015, 09:18 AM
  #12  
reno808
Rennlist Member
 
reno808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the garage trying to keep boost down
Posts: 8,809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Noahs944
I already run one of the hottest cams bro.
LOL

Brah if you already running one of the hottest cams then why upgrade your head even more if it had to be upgraded. Your already running one of the hottest cam bro.

If I'm incorrect bro, can you please define "hottest cams"
Old 05-28-2015, 09:21 AM
  #13  
reno808
Rennlist Member
 
reno808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the garage trying to keep boost down
Posts: 8,809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paulyy
bigger valves, ported head. get bigger exhaust valves also since there's no ceramic like the turbo heads.
4-1 tuned headers, probably a short runner intake.
47mm intake
42mm exhaust

Then you should see some results.
not much, specially if thats the only mod. and depending on what your looking for 4-1 "tuned" headers may hurt you. At least by the looks of the OP
Old 05-28-2015, 11:26 PM
  #14  
Noahs944
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Noahs944's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 4,015
Received 229 Likes on 168 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by reno808
LOL

Brah if you already running one of the hottest cams then why upgrade your head even more if it had to be upgraded. Your already running one of the hottest cam bro.

If I'm incorrect bro, can you please define "hottest cams"
My mistake for the short answer. I just wanted to focus on the head & not the cam. If I could re-word what I said: "One of of the hottest cams that I know of, without needing to machine the head, and still have something thats street-able for a DD".

I've posted this information before. The cam I have been running lately: Milledge 8sr-14: http://jonmilledgeengineering.com/product/8sr-14/

Big THANKS to everyone for the insights & ideas.
Old 05-28-2015, 11:50 PM
  #15  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,497
Received 632 Likes on 490 Posts
Default

save your money on valve work/porting. even with that cam you just aren't moving enough air to overwhelm the stock head. while the shape could be improved the ports are pretty darn big already and flow very well as standard.

unless money is no object for this car, then go nuts.


Quick Reply: Help me design my head



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:58 PM.