Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

PPI 968 compression test results, need to worry?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-23-2014, 03:25 AM
  #1  
HeroOfSpielburg
3rd Gear
Thread Starter
 
HeroOfSpielburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default PPI 968 compression test results, need to worry?

Hi guys,

I'm trying to wrap my head around all that's needed to make a well-informed buying decision. Car is a '92 968 hard top.

In the PPI yesterday I believe I was told the compression readings came back 14:14:14:12 (I wasn't conversing in my native language so not 100% sure).

Is this a red flag that I'm going to need a valve rework or a ring job in the near future, or likely going to be okay?

Thanks for the feedback guys and helping this rookie.

D.
Old 08-23-2014, 05:23 AM
  #2  
cruise98
Three Wheelin'
 
cruise98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,576
Received 22 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

What unit of measure is that ?
Old 08-23-2014, 05:49 AM
  #3  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

probably means
140
140
140
120
but who knows.
Old 08-23-2014, 10:30 AM
  #4  
Jfrahm
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Jfrahm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 6,407
Likes: 0
Received 104 Likes on 92 Posts
Default

Probably Bar, I would not worry too much if it's a street car. The numbers are not good (over 10%) but if the car has a lot of KM I would not worry about it. If it was supposed to be like new or recently overhauled I'd make it an issue. You could do a leakdown test too I suppose and re-do the compression test on a warm engine.

IMO the higher the compression the more likely you are to have diverging numbers in a compression test so the 10% rule-of-thumb is perhaps too strict for the 968.
Old 08-23-2014, 01:44 PM
  #5  
HeroOfSpielburg
3rd Gear
Thread Starter
 
HeroOfSpielburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the feedback guys. I think the mechanic meant bars, but I'll double check. I'll get a written report back early next week and revisit it. The car has only 60k miles but the first three years before it came into the country it has no service history. The manual looks also like pages may have been added (holes around the staples are a little bigger on the bottom than top), but there is a sizeable stack of receipts and government inspection reports in the maintenance binder. Hopefully there's no skeletons in the closet because I really like her.
Old 08-23-2014, 04:03 PM
  #6  
MB968
Racer
 
MB968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Portland, Or.
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I agree, at about 15%, that seems way too much. Indicates that you'd need to plan some work, likely on the heads. I'd think the cylinder walls would have to be pretty bad to create this much difference (and you'd see that in oil usage)
Old 08-24-2014, 10:11 PM
  #7  
michaelmount123
Rennlist Member
 
michaelmount123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 1,062
Received 214 Likes on 133 Posts
Default

The OP is getting misinformation here and it could lead him to make the wrong decisions! Mr. HeroOfSpeilburg, please consider the following:

1. Do not worry. You have not presented the correct test results, so the responses are not valid. Do check back with your technician.
2. Understand the difference between a compression test and a leak-down test. Then understand the correct way to do both tests, and what the results mean. Goggle is our friend.
3. At this point there is NO indication you have a problem.
Old 08-25-2014, 07:27 AM
  #8  
HeroOfSpielburg
3rd Gear
Thread Starter
 
HeroOfSpielburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok, so I got the report back from the mechanic and he said the reading on the last cylinder is off by two kilobars (14 vs. 12). This is 14%. However, I called the mechanic today to clarify and he said that the car ran well idling and driving (they drove it), and it didn't seem that there were any other problems so he didn't think it was cause for concern now and the car was okay to buy. Am I making a mistake buying the car without redoing the compression test and an accompanying leakdown?
Old 08-25-2014, 02:48 PM
  #9  
Jfrahm
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Jfrahm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 6,407
Likes: 0
Received 104 Likes on 92 Posts
Default

Again I think it's fine for a street car and not recently overhauled. If the test was re-done following a spirited drive and a leakdown were performed you might find no issue. If it was a race car or the seller was touting a full top end rebuild that'd be different.
Old 08-27-2014, 06:17 AM
  #10  
FRporscheman
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
FRporscheman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Francisco Area
Posts: 11,014
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

To put your mind at ease, you should have a leakdown test done. That will determine where the loss of compression is occuring. Your mechanic should know how to determine this.

Doing both tests on a warm engine would give more information.
Old 08-27-2014, 07:11 AM
  #11  
Van
Rennlist Member
 
Van's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hyde Park, NY
Posts: 12,007
Received 88 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

If the test is in bar (not kilo bar), the numbers would be 203 psi and 174 psi.



Quick Reply: PPI 968 compression test results, need to worry?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:18 AM.