Notices
911 Forum 1964-1989
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Intercity Lines, LLC

A 911SC ? What year is best ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-26-2016, 10:51 PM
  #31  
bv shady
Racer
 
bv shady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Philadelphia PA
Posts: 303
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

There is an ongoing debate on if the SC variants were super carreras (SC) as many say that was never designated in print but Porsche Classic references them as such http://www.porsche.com/usa/accessori.../911-g/911-sc/
Old 08-26-2016, 11:01 PM
  #32  
Freddie Two Bs
Drifting
 
Freddie Two Bs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 3,256
Received 462 Likes on 294 Posts
Default

Or like I saw in an ad by a curbstoner flipper a couple years ago, "Sport Coupe".
Old 08-27-2016, 01:06 AM
  #33  
Edward
Addicted Specialist
Rennlist Member
 
Edward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: So.CA
Posts: 6,072
Received 297 Likes on 177 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Crossworth
Hello RL,

Once upon time a friend over heard a discussion about what is the best year to own in the 911SC realm. I always thought it would be last of the production run. To my surprise he said it is the early generation SCs. Sadly he cannot recall what was the reason for the early generation being most desirable.

I am hoping some one could shed some light.

I figure several RLers know the answer.
I certainly do not.

Thank you
The 78-79SC had the bigger ports IIRC, maybe just the intake ports but I won't swear to it. While the larger ports don't yield more power in and of themselves, natch, in concert with other mods like mild cams (964 cam grind IIRC) and better exhaust flow, say SSIs, I had heard that they have greater potential for HP gains over the 80-83SCs. OTOH, these earlier SCs also had that silly air pump (lame EPA) that lots of folks ended up just yanking it and buying plugs for the unplumbed ports.

Realistically, there are faaaaaar too many variables for a car this old to worry about which "year" is the better SC. As you've already read here, condition, PPI, and what's available on the market trumps all.

Edward
Old 08-30-2016, 09:21 AM
  #34  
09mageec
Racer
 
09mageec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: CT
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a 79sc, black handles and trim, painted headlamp rings. It had to either be An option that year, or that it started half way through the production year. I have to check my production month again.

Last edited by 09mageec; 09-02-2016 at 08:31 AM.
Old 09-01-2016, 09:10 PM
  #35  
Peter Zimmermann
Rennlist Member
 
Peter Zimmermann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bakersfield, CA, for now...
Posts: 20,607
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

To the OP, yes, there are differences between SCs. I discuss these cars thoroughly in my book, The Used 911 Story, but sadly the 8th Edition is out of print, and the new, expanded 9th Edition is not yet ready to go to print. I strongly recommend that you find a used copy of the 8th Edition (Amazon.com), or wait for the 9th Edition to become available. As of today I can't give a date, but the new/revised text has been proofed and approved. I silently hope for Christmas '16, but my publisher might think otherwise; he is doing all he can to put a bow on the project!
Old 09-02-2016, 08:33 AM
  #36  
09mageec
Racer
 
09mageec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: CT
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Peter Zimmermann
To the OP, yes, there are differences between SCs. I discuss these cars thoroughly in my book, The Used 911 Story, but sadly the 8th Edition is out of print, and the new, expanded 9th Edition is not yet ready to go to print. I strongly recommend that you find a used copy of the 8th Edition (Amazon.com), or wait for the 9th Edition to become available. As of today I can't give a date, but the new/revised text has been proofed and approved. I silently hope for Christmas '16, but my publisher might think otherwise; he is doing all he can to put a bow on the project!

Be sure to let us know when this does happen, I would like to add this to the collection.
Old 09-02-2016, 09:08 AM
  #37  
tgil
Pro
 
tgil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Durham NC.
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

SCs seem to be one of the best 911 values, but owning a 3.2 (Targa-nonmodified,stock) for a short time, dont eliminate that series from your search- the engine felt significantly more powerful and body style also timeless, and still a simple car with a true purely functional and kinda stark interior. Condition and previous owner(s) care important to a degree depending on your intentions with the car.
Good luck.



Quick Reply: A 911SC ? What year is best ?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:00 AM.